Tomous 2021-07-19

Hello, I have looked at his color printing cost of 250 euros per image. If I don't choose color printing, will it affect the review? Did the original poster choose color printing?

Fulin 2021-07-15

Hello, it seems that this journal has open access (OA). May I ask what are the specific conditions for this? Does accepting OA have an impact on the speed of peer review?

我人生，我奋斗 2021-07-13

21-3-10 Submission
21-4-21 Major Repair
21-5-28 Minor Repair
21-7-12 Accepted

Leiyj 2021-06-29

21-2-27 Submission;
21-4-29 Minor revision;
21-5-7 Acceptance

Kol_xr 2021-06-04

21-03-07 Submission
21-05-26 Minor revision
21-05-29 Revised
21-06-02 Accepted

xjtu-godfather 2021-05-28

Submitted (15-Mar-2021) - The document was submitted on March 15, 2021.
Major Revision (19-Apr-2021) - A significant revision was made on April 19, 2021.
Minor Revision (24-May-2021) - A minor revision was made on May 24, 2021.
Formal Accept (27-May-2021) - The document was formally accepted on May 27, 2021.

Kol_xr 2021-05-06

Already invested for 2 months, under review, waiting for the results.

Z624928974 2021-04-27

The template provided by the journal states that it is a double-blind review process, but it is not actually double-blind.
There were three reviewers, and the initial review process took a total of one and a half months. During this period, the status changed once to "awaiting decision" and then changed again to "awaiting reference report". This might be because one reviewer directly recommended acceptance, and then the editor found another reviewer, as most other cases have two reviewers.
The second review process took almost a month, and in the end, the decision was to accept. The speed of the review process depends entirely on the reviewers' speed. Some papers with ID numbers after mine have been accepted before mine.

明明如月 2021-03-28

Reviewed within one week, feedback on the manuscript will be given within 21 days - major revisions. The reviewer is very professional and provided 15 suggestions for modifications, requesting them to be returned within one month. After 15 days, additional suggestions for further revisions will be given, with a requirement to return them within 2 weeks. After the revisions are returned, further modifications will be made, amounting to a total of three rounds of revisions.

我人生，我奋斗 2021-03-22

How long does it take for this journal to be indexed after acceptance?

annhappy 2021-03-01

When I saw that it had been submitted for a month and a half, the editor made a decision, and then a week later, I found out it was sent out for external review again. What's going on? Does anyone know?

Arry12138 2021-02-18

The initial review was a bit slow, possibly due to a biased direction. It took two months just to find reviewers. After submitting the manuscript, it took around four months to receive feedback, and it took approximately two weeks to make revisions and have the paper accepted.

yancy-东 2021-01-28

What does "被returned by Editor" mean? Does it also mean "被rejected"?

谈天论季 2021-01-13

2020-10-27 Post
2020-12-02 Return for major revisions, given one month to make changes
2021-1-12 Accepted for publication
Overall, the editing efficiency is very high. There were a total of 16 comments from 4 reviewers, with 2 or 3 questions being somewhat difficult to answer, but the rest were fine. Personally, I feel that the journal requires some level of innovation, but the emphasis is more on the completeness of the work and sufficient experiments.

磕盐小渣渣 2021-01-12

Can the host communicate?

微凉的衣柜 2021-01-12

I personally focus on the direction of three-dimensional scanning detection, with emphasis on algorithms in the paper. The content of the measurement is not particularly substantial.
Sep 21, 2020: Submission
Nov 19, 2020: Major revision (The reviewer suggested minor revisions, but the editor suggested major revisions due to some differences with the journal's direction and recommended improvements.)
Dec 15, 2020: Revised
Dec 30, 2020: Accepted
Jan 11, 2021: Published
The overall speed of the journal is relatively fast, and the editor is also responsible. When revising, it is sufficient to reply to the reviewer's requirements one by one. During the revision, some formulas were not edited using a formula editor, and the editor requested a modification. In addition, the paper's images referenced images from other websites, and the editor requested permission for their use. When submitting articles, it is advisable to pay attention to these related matters to avoid trouble.