Verified Reviews - MEASUREMENT SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

KatieLet 2021-12-15

Is it difficult to get accepted by this journal?

李大爷的爸爸 2021-12-14

The amount of manuscripts is too large, and the difficulty of acceptance is not small. Also, recently, are foreigners preparing to celebrate Christmas? Are they on vacation?

KatieLet 2021-12-14

It has been 9 days since submission, and it is still in Manuscript Received status.

爱撸串的小学生 2021-12-13

It has been 25 days since submission, and the status is still "manuscript received". I inquired about the status once, and was told that it is still under quality evaluation. There has been no change in the status.

不会发SCI 2021-12-13

The status still hasn't changed.

Fortunever 2021-12-12

Has your condition changed?

984130770 2021-12-11

It's been almost a month, and it's still "manuscript received".

李大爷的爸爸 2021-12-10

I plan to switch. Even trans isn't this slow.

ye2019 2021-12-10

The speed is too slow. I plan to withdraw the submission and make a new one. Also, when I checked the manuscript number, I was startled. It is too big.

cuijieer 2021-12-10

It has been 22 days, and it is still "manuscript received".

不会发SCI 2021-12-10

It has been 15 days, also Manuscript Received.

威少 2021-12-10

It has been 15 days since submission, and the status is still "Manuscript Received."

RWZB 2021-12-09

Has the original poster's status changed in the end? I have submitted it for over half a month now, and it is still listed as "manuscript received".

Fortunever 2021-12-09

How long will this state last?

邹舟 2021-12-02

Are you kidding me? Is the water quality of District 4 very high?

lulu21 2021-11-19

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal requires payment. I didn't quite understand the official website.

M73ACat 2021-11-18

2021-9-9 Submission
2021-11-17 Rejected politely
Two reviewers, one was very diligent while the other casually raised a couple of questions. The editor rejected it, citing that it was not suitable for this journal.

Ethel398 2021-11-13

Excuse me, may I ask how much is the cost for this journal, OP?

KK11 2021-11-11

The mainstream international journals in this field are well-known, and the quality of the articles in them is high. The impact factor has been increasing year by year, and the efficiency is also very good. The editor-in-chief is very responsible, and the suggestions given by the three reviewers are indeed professional, which indicates that the reviewers are experts in the field. The quality of the articles has been greatly improved through revisions. I wish the journal continued success in the future.

Mz.DAFA 2021-11-10

It's been so slow lately, isn't it? It has been 10 days and it's still "manuscript received".

chxifei 2021-10-15

I have never experienced this state before, so I am not sure. It feels like an editor agreeing to review.

Vivi666 2021-10-11

2021.02.01 Submission

2021.03.09 First review feedback: 2 reviewers, 4 comments from one reviewer, 11 comments from another reviewer, revisions provided by the editor, 2 weeks for revision

2021.03.22 Revisions

2021.04.08 Accepted

2021.05.10 Published

xiaofei213 2021-09-29

May I ask how many days it takes for this journal to make a decision?

Jukebox 2021-09-24

I am in the same situation. May I ask if you found out the specific reason later?

Jukebox 2021-09-24

Hello, I would like to ask if "1st reviewer agreed to report" means that we have received a reviewer's comments? If we receive comments from a second reviewer, will it change to "2nd reviewer agreed to report"? Thank you.

科研小学生123 2021-08-28

Two reviewers have both provided modification suggestions. However, the editor did not give the opportunity to make the changes and rejected it, stating that it is not suitable for this journal and suggested submitting it to another journal. If it wasn't suitable, why did they send it for review in the first place? They could have just told me directly. What a waste of time. Frustrating.

chxifei 2021-08-25

Extremely efficient, very fast, not difficult.
2021-6-23 Manuscript Received
2021-6-30 Awaiting Referee Reports
2021-8-15 Awaiting Decision
2021-8-16 Moderate Revision
2021-8-20 Manuscript Received
2021-8-20 Awaiting Referee Reports/Copyright Form
2021-8-21 Awaiting Decision
2021-8-23 Provisionally Accepted
2021-8-24 Formal Accept

Fu LetPub 2021-08-05

18-jun-2021 Manuscript received
20-jun-2021 Awaiting referee reports
19-jul-2021 Moderate Revision
22-jul-2021 Revision submitted
22-jul-2021 Awaiting referee reports
29-jul-2021 Provisionally accepted
03-Aug-2021 Formal Accept

Translation:

18-Jun-2021: Manuscript received
20-Jun-2021: Awaiting referee reports
19-Jul-2021: Moderate Revision
22-Jul-2021: Revision submitted
22-Jul-2021: Awaiting referee reports
29-Jul-2021: Provisionally accepted
03-Aug-2021: Formal Accept

judith14 2021-07-22

01-Apr-2021 submit the article
12-May-2021 Major Revision
04-Jun-2021 Revise the article
07-Jul-2021 Formal Accept

mslg 2021-07-21

21-5-19 submitted
21-6-14 moderate revision
21-7-12 minor revision
21-7-19 accepted
21-7-21 online

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started