超新星的理想 2023-02-05

I also submitted on January 10th, it has been over 25 days, and it is still with the editor. What's going on?

wjp 2023-02-04

Excuse me, is there anyone who has submitted the modified draft using .tex in the past two days? When I reach the last step of building the PDF, the generated PDF file always shows garbled characters and reports an error: "LaTeX Error: Mismatched LaTeX support files detected. (LaTeX) Loading 'expl3.sty' aborted!" Is there anyone who has encountered the same issue? How did you solve it?

棒棒来冲浪 2023-02-03

Posted in July of year 22, rejected and resubmitted, one reviewer ran away, replaced by another reviewer. After major revisions, it was still rejected and resubmitted. This time, two reviewers ran away, feeling overwhelmed, the editor started inviting new reviewers again. Why do reviewers keep running away... After being asked a bunch of questions and answering them one by one, he disagreed with reviewing, unbelievable.

DavidWang 2023-02-02

System update. When I was fixing it, I also encountered it.

DavidWang 2023-02-02

2022.7 submit
2022.11 major revise Five reviewers, three agree to accept, two minor revisions, a total of eight comments. The editor decided on a major revision.
2022.12.5 Revised but requested an editable document. Also, created another Word version. It took a long time due to personal reasons.
2023.1 Revised.
2023.1.24 accept
The paper is about deep learning image relocalization. Overall, I feel lucky. The first review took a very long time, four months. The second review took about a week. Well, it's hard to say for sure, but the quality of the paper is very important. Formatting, writing, and layout should be done well, but the editor will help with that. I specified reviewers from the relevant field, not sure if it made a difference. The reviewers' comments were quite helpful for revisions.

cwer 2023-01-31

Is this link sent through the submission system or directly to the corresponding author's email?

粲小星 2023-01-31

2022.05.19 Post
2022.05.28—2023.01.31 No news on external review
One year begins, f...

VEECY 2023-01-28

Same as me, the state with editor has not changed for more than ten days.

ZQ 2023-01-28

2023.01.08 Post
2023.01.10 with editor
2023.01.28 Still with editor
The processing efficiency is really low!
The email with "with editor" was sent to the supervisor, so I don't know who the editor is, and I don't know if it's the same terrible French person.

s_u 2023-01-28

2022.10.17 Submitted
2022.11.17 Under review
2023.1.28 Still under review, it has been almost four months.

GardenGn 2023-01-25

1.20Submit
1.23With Editor
4.04Under review
5.19Major revision
6.13Submit
6.16With Editor
6.27Under review

Translation:
1.20 - Submitted
1.23 - With Editor
4.04 - Under review
5.19 - Major revision
6.13 - Submitted
6.16 - With Editor
6.27 - Under review

SCI-N 2023-01-17

Posted on October 11th
Received on January 16th
Took three months in total
Went through two major revisions (three reviewers, two of them were okay, one had more comments)
Overall, the editing speed was very fast.

怎么又accepted了 2023-01-17

Rejected manuscript resubmission, however, when submitting author information, ResearcherID and ORCID have become mandatory, what the heck.

Muzi_f 2023-01-12

Same question, when submitting the manuscript, there are always errors in modifying the correspondence. So I submitted it directly. I want to ask if it can be modified afterwards.

lingbaishi 2023-01-11

I guess it should be the editor sending out review invitations. Regardless of whether anyone agrees to review, the date will still change. Additionally, if reviewers accept the review or provide feedback, it will also change. I'm not sure about the specifics. Because what I did is a bit biased and doesn't really fit within the scope of measurement, it might be difficult to find reviewers as well.

TONY1234 2023-01-11

I had a similar speed to you in the early stage, especially fast. I submitted it with a score of 12.2, and it has remained "under review" without any changes. However, the date has changed several times. Do you know what the change in date means?

lingbaishi 2023-01-10

Not going very smoothly, I checked with the Track system of Elsevier using the login information provided by my supervisor. For the entire month of December, only one reviewer accepted the manuscript for review. On January 8th, they provided their comments, and on January 9th, the second reviewer accepted the manuscript. Currently, it is still under review.

Cvv5226 2023-01-09

Hello, may I ask where can I see the names of the responsible editor and assistant?

Cvv5226 2023-01-09

Hello, may I ask if I should contact the editor in the "Send Email" section on the status page?

为SCI的奋斗 2023-01-08

10.1 Submit
11.16 Minor revision and submit
12.26 Minor revision and submit
1.1 Accepted

king-jr 2023-01-07

I want to ask, can the corresponding author be modified for this journal?

大头 2023-01-06

2022.07.23 Submission,
2022.08.24 Under review, (reportedly coinciding with the vacation of the responsible editor)
2022.11.28 First review comments received, major revision
In mid-November, the Elsevier Support Center sent four or five emails questioning why there was only one reviewer for over three months, urging the editor to promptly handle the manuscript that had been pending for four months. Clearly, the effect was significant, as after continuous email bombardment, the editor found two additional reviewers within a week and completed the review process in less than a week, going from "decision in process" to sending the decision email in just one day.
2022.12.10 Revised manuscript returned
2022.12.25 Direct acceptance
Overall, this year's manuscript review cycle has significantly lengthened. When submitting in 2021, the first review took less than 2 months, and the second review took 1 month, totaling less than 3 months. This year, with the addition of the summer vacation factor, it extended to over 5 months. However, despite the year-long interval between the two submissions, the editor remained the same. This year, the journal officially became a second-tier journal, which is good.

wjp 2023-01-03

Reply to yourself, take a look if you need it. For revised manuscripts, tex source code or Word documents need to be submitted. Most people should use LaTeX. Both manuscripts with changes marks and without changes marks should be submitted as separate tex files. The images should be uploaded as figures, and when referencing them in the tex file, do not use subfolder format, as it will cause errors. If the generated PDF is garbled, search for the keyword "error" and solve them one by one to compile successfully.

wjp 2023-01-03

Excuse me, when submitting the manuscript for repair, should I upload a single tex file regardless of whether there are changes marked or no changes marked? Should the figure be uploaded separately as a figure file? And then should the system compile it online?

wjp 2023-01-03

When you submit your revised manuscript, do you only need to upload a single tex file, whether it has changes marks or no changes marks? Should the figures be uploaded separately? And then should the system compile them online?

hlnzxl 2023-01-03

The review process is fast, and the editor is very responsible. The publication is quickly released after acceptance.

wjp 2023-01-03

I would like to ask everyone how to submit a repair request. In the reply email, it mentioned "please upload the source files for your article". However, I couldn't find the corresponding section on the submission interface. So I packaged the source code and submitted it as an attachment, but it was rejected by the editor. So how should I submit it then...

s_u 2023-01-03

I have been unable to complete the first trial for a week longer than you.

LiangY 2023-01-02

2022.9.16 Initial Submitted - Submitted initially on September 16, 2022.
2022.9.23 Under Review - Under review since September 23, 2022.
2022.10.23 Major Revision - Major revision required on October 23, 2022.
2022.11.12 Revision Submission - Revised submission made on November 12, 2022.
2022.11.27 Major Revision - Major revision required again on November 27, 2022.
2022.12.12 Revision Submission - Revised submission made again on December 12, 2022.
2022.12.27 Accept with minor Revision - Accepted with minor revisions on December 27, 2022.
2022.12.29 Revision Submission - Revised submission made again on December 29, 2022.
2022.12.29 Accept - Accepted on December 29, 2022.
The entire process took a bit long, but the review process was fast. The time given for providing feedback during the review was short, and the editor handled the revisions quickly. Usually, the manuscript was under review the day after the initial submission. The main delay was caused by two major revisions.

Jy杨 2023-01-02

10.25 Submission 11.28 Provide feedback for rework 12.16 Submit reworked draft 12.29 Receive 12.31 Online