ninomiya 2023-03-08

Excuse me, where is the track-submission interface located? When I log in to the submission website, I can only see the current status, but I cannot see the detailed status and update time.

ZZT123 2023-03-08

I am also in the field of fault diagnosis. It has been 8 months already, and I am still waiting for the second review results. This French editor is too exaggerated.

whiwnl 2023-03-07

The track-submission page allows viewing updates on status and time.

龙行天下666 2023-03-07

Directly hired? No modifications?

烟火而居 2023-03-07

Is your date's availability on the platform subject to change? Is he a reviewer who waits for one reviewer to finish before inviting the next one?

ZQ 2023-03-07

@FireworksLiving: Mine has not been submitted for review and has been in the hands of the editor for over 50 days. Then, after one reminder, it was rejected. It was that extremely disgusting French person, and the reason given was that it did not fit within the scope of the journal. I have referenced 8 articles on measurement in my bibliography. Damn it... I suggest everyone to be cautious when submitting in the direction of fault diagnosis, as there is a high probability of encountering that French person.

whiwnl 2023-03-07

My research direction is target detection in engineering applications. Here is the record of the submission status for the journal Measurement:

2023.01.02 Submitted to Journal
2023.01.02 With Editor
2023.01.12 With Editor (change of editor)
2023.01.21 Under Review
2023.02.09 Under Review (reviewer 1 completed review)
2023.02.12 Under Review (reviewer 2 accepted review invitation)
2023.02.25 Under Review (reviewer 2 completed review)
2023.03.05 Decision in Process
2023.03.09 Reject
The reviewers felt that the innovation in the paper was insufficient, and the article needs editing.

超新星的理想 2023-03-07

Posted on January 7th, followed up twice with no response in between, and remained with the editor. Decided to withdraw the submission on March 7th.

烟火而居 2023-03-07

My article has also been submitted for over 40 days and is currently under review. Did it really get rejected after you reminded them to review it?

ZQ 2023-03-07

投稿于1月8日，与编辑交流于1月10日，3月5日仍与编辑交流，3月6日催促稿件，3月7日被法国编辑拒绝。整个过程只用了两个月，真是太快了哈哈哈哈哈。

烟火而居 2023-03-05

You are so fast. Recently, there are too many articles piled up in the journal that haven't been published.

bbw222 2023-03-05

3.1 with editor - This version is being reviewed by the editor.
3.4 with editor - This version is also being reviewed by the editor.
3.5 under review - Version 3.5 is currently being reviewed.

棒棒来冲浪 2023-03-05

It has been eight months, and finally the third reviewer has been found. With their review, we are only waiting for them to finish. Give me a final decision quickly, the slowness is infuriating.

TONY1234 2023-03-03

What is the quality of the papers in this journal? Are they highly demanding in terms of innovation?

s_u 2023-03-02

I am not sure who is in charge... The person who replied to the email is Elmer G P Jr, and I am in a state of 2 2+ 2+.

棒棒来冲浪 2023-03-02

Which editor are you, Luca De Vito, Ph.D? He invites a new reviewer every Wednesday but can never find one. The advisor is ready to withdraw the submission and switch journals because it is taking too long.

s_u 2023-03-02

The translation of the text into English is: "Our situations are quite similar. I applied in October, and the first trial has not been completed yet. When I emailed to inquire about the result, they said they still need to wait for one more person. I just felt disgusted."

棒棒来冲浪 2023-02-28

Heartless, what are you laughing at, bro? This journal has been incredibly slow lately, it's driving me crazy. Before I submitted my work, I definitely saw your comment in 2021 saying it would take off quickly. (Dog head)

棒棒来冲浪 2023-02-27

I must find new reviewers. In the first round, I had three reviewers. After making revisions, one reviewer disappeared. Then I found another reviewer, but it still required major revisions. After resubmitting, another reviewer disappeared. It has been eight months since submission. I have sent three emails to the editor, but haven't received any replies.

ZZT123 2023-02-27

Two reviewers were assigned for the first round of review, and they recommended major revisions. After completing the revisions, one of the reviewers responded promptly during the second round of review. However, the other reviewer disappeared. Now, should the editor invite a new reviewer? Can the decision be made based on the opinion of the first reviewer? Has this situation occurred before?

灯灯灯 2023-02-25

Thank you!!! I have little experience, and I thought there was missing information in the email edit.

wjp 2023-02-25

Reviewer 1 invited did not provide feedback, so the editor skipped over them. Quite lucky, good luck.

灯灯灯 2023-02-25

Received the edited view letter two months after submission, with major revisions. The feedback included comments from two reviewers, labeled as #2 and #3. Does this mean that the editor missed the comments from reviewer #1, or were there only two reviewers?

超新星的理想 2023-02-24

Always with the editor, what should I do, even emails are not replied to!

超新星的理想 2023-02-24

I'm really fed up. January 10, with the editor; February 24, still with the editor. It's been a month and a half, I don't want to review it. Just reject it, it's a waste of time!

小小新新仔 2023-02-24

So when submitting, you can strongly suggest avoiding editing this *** in the Comments section.

Cvv5226 2023-02-23

Hello, may I ask how to know who my responsible editor is?

Cvv5226 2023-02-23

Hello, may I ask how to view one's responsible editor?

Cvv5226 2023-02-23

May I ask how to know who my editor is?

漫漫科研路1997 2023-02-22

Three experts, two were hired, one said the research was interesting but the methods were not novel. The editor rejected the submission and suggested resubmission. The plan is to give it another try.