忍者饿了 2023-07-25

6.7 submitted to journal
6.9 with editor / under review
6.29 RRC / major revision - 3 reviewers, 3+11+1 comments
7.06 revision submitted to journal
7.09 under review
7.21 RRC / Accept with Minor Revision - 2 reviewers had no issues, one raised three questions which were addressed with additional experiments.
7.22 revision submitted to journal
7.25 Accept
The entire process from submission to acceptance took 48 days.
The editor is an efficient Italian individual with a Ph.D. and provided prompt responses, with the review decision from RRC received within an hour.

小木木木 2023-07-24

It has been 20 days with the editor, and it hasn't been reviewed yet. What's the situation on your end?

ScigLio 2023-07-23

Sorry, but "7.23 RRC" does not appear to be a complete sentence or phrase that can be translated. Can you please provide more context or clarify the text you would like to be translated?

浑水摸鱼打老虎 2023-07-23

Ah, some reviewers are so abnormal now! If they don't have time for reviewing, they shouldn't agree in the first place. And if they feel hesitant to reject a submission, it's better to reject it early if they think it's not right for the author's benefit!

该叫个啥呢 2023-07-22

May I ask who is the editor?

孟器 2023-07-22

feb 16, 2023 submitted to journal
feb 17, 2023 with editor
feb 20, 2023 under review
jun 07, 2023 major revision
jun 26, 2023 revision submitted to journal
jun 27, 2023 with editor
jun 28, 2023 under review
jul 17, 2023 required reviews completed
jul 17, 2023 accept with minor revision
jul 19, 2023 revision submitted to journal
jul 20, 2023 with editor
jul 21, 2023 accept

Personal first SCI, encountered efficient editor and meticulous reviewers, very fortunate!

Liu yun 2023-07-21

Jul 17, 2023 Submit
Jul 19, 2023 With Editor

zzzzzstand 2023-07-21

I also doubted that the article mentioned upstairs was mine. It has been almost a year since I submitted it. Among the three reviewers in the first review, one of them ran away. I found a new reviewer, but they have not reviewed it for two months. I sent an email to urge them, but they directly ignored it. Now I'm looking for a new reviewer again. I'm really speechless.

风之小翼 2023-07-21

This article that I reviewed seems to have been submitted in the 22nd year, judging by the number. I provided feedback in February, and it is currently still under review. It's really scary.

scoott 2023-07-20

I submitted it on June 19th, and it is still with the editor.

scoott 2023-07-20

It has been almost a month, still with the editor, crying.

浑水摸鱼打老虎 2023-07-20

Mine too, I submitted it on March 31st, and it is still under review as of July 20th.

浑水摸鱼打老虎 2023-07-20

The second reviewer's comments have been under review for 6 weeks. Does my poor paper deserve to be reviewed for such a long time?

mei2023 2023-07-20

Mar 22, 2023 submit - Submitted on March 22, 2023
May 30, 2023 under review - Under review since May 30, 2023
Jun 17, 2023 required scores completed - Required scores completed on June 17, 2023
Jun 25, 2023 decision in process - Decision process initiated on June 25, 2023
Jun 30, 2023 major revision - Major revision required by June 30, 2023
Jun 14, 2023 resubmit - Resubmit by June 14, 2023
Jun 29, 2023 under review - Under review since June 29, 2023

李棉花 2023-07-20

7.6日 with the editor has remained unchanged until now, and I have not received any email indicating who the assigned editor is. I don't know whether to remind them to submit the manuscript or not.

鲸鲸 2023-07-19

The third person has not yet accepted.

鲸鲸 2023-07-19

In the first review, three reviewers recommended major revisions. In the second review, only two reviewers accepted the manuscript and have already provided their comments. Will the editor still wait for the third reviewer?

0103. 2023-07-19

Can two reviewers also be RRC?

GoTo 2023-07-19

2.9 submit
3.10 Under review
3.19 3.22 4.11 The number of reviewers has been increasing
5.02 5.17 Still under review
5.17 required reviews complete, invited 11 reviewers, but only 2 participated in the review
minor Both reviewers' comments are not very critical
5.29 submit
6.02 under review
6.02-7.18 During this period, reviewers were continuously invited. By July 18th, both reviewers had successfully completed the review.
7.19 Still inviting reviewers to review
After revising based on the minor comments from the first review, it seems that the problem is not significant.
It has been 5 months since submission, and the review speed is considered acceptable for this journal.
Hope all colleagues will accept soon.

烟火而居 2023-07-19

How many reviewers are there? My display shows 2+.

烟火而居 2023-07-19

Family, I am almost giving up waiting. It has been almost 6 months since I submitted on January 21st and until now, July 19th, I have only received one review. There is still no news from the second reviewer, and I am getting anxious. I have sent two reminders, and their response was that they are urging the reviewers. Initially, there was a change in the 20-day system deadline, but now it has been a month without any change. Should I withdraw my submission and resubmit it?

DTApple 2023-07-15

May I ask what the situation is when the "with editor" status remains unchanged but the date has changed?

lingbaishi 2023-07-14

The last time, both the initial review and the re-review were with the editor on the second day, and on the third day with the UR.

StevenTian 2023-07-14

7.14 accept translates to "7.14 accept" in English.

冰魄 2023-07-14

How long ago did you submit it for review?

lingbaishi 2023-07-13

7.3 Submission
7.5 With editor
7.13 No changes so far, feeling like it's going cold. Last time it was accepted, it was reviewed at lightning speed.

忍者饿了 2023-07-13

I didn't delete the fund, but I also reviewed it normally. I am currently in the second review.

冰魄 2023-07-12

Forgot to delete it, will it be sent back?

冰魄 2023-07-12

Do blind review manuscripts need to remove fund information?

冰魄 2023-07-12

Do you need to delete the fund information in the manuscript?