Jy杨 2022-11-27

The translation of "Decision in Process 2022 11 26" into English is: Decision is currently being processed on November 26, 2022.

张医生-- 2022-11-23

May I ask where to contact customer service? Is it the "Send E-mail" option in the submission section?

logicube 2022-11-21

11.17 received.

棒棒来冲浪 2022-11-18

May I ask which editor you are? I also encountered this situation where one of the three reviewers for the second review went missing, leaving only two reviewers. I have been unable to find a new one, and it has been two months since I made revisions. I want to send an email to urge them, and if it doesn't work, I will withdraw the submission and submit it elsewhere.

棒棒来冲浪 2022-11-18

In the first review, there were three reviewers. After making revisions, the paper was resubmitted. However, one of the reviewers disappeared and it has been difficult to find a new reviewer. The editor has invited a total of 14 people, but no one agreed to review the paper. What should be done? It has been two months since the revised submission, should an email be sent to urge the process? It is taking too long, it has been six months since the initial submission, and a new reviewer is still being sought for the second review.

zzzcumt 2022-11-18

Applied in January this year, hired at the end of November. The cost-effectiveness is good, but the process is slow.

HouWen19970320 2022-11-18

If it is that French editor, it is normal to refuse.

aa11 2022-11-18

Rejected after submission, feeling upset, don't know why. They said I don't meet the journal's submission criteria, but there are clearly many articles in similar fields published in this journal.

SF221 2022-11-15

Okay, thank you. I just asked customer service and it has changed to DIP. It seems like I still have to continue waiting.

tongtong111 2022-11-15

Look at the editing and reviewing results. It will be done in a couple of hours, and if the reviewing comments contradict each other, it may take a few days.

SF221 2022-11-14

Does anyone know how long it usually takes to give opinions after completing the Required Reviews?

VV889 2022-11-13

11.12, rejected due to mismatch between the paper and the journal's subject.

HouWen19970320 2022-11-13

If it is a French editor, I would suggest not to hold on to fantasies directly. I have never seen him with a live mouth in his hands.

当然是在 2022-11-13

* Oct 19, Submitted
* Oct 20, With Editor
* Nov 13, Rejected
Editor: Raphaēl Trouillon

Translation:
* Oct 19, Submitted
* Oct 20, With Editor
* Nov 13, Rejected
Editor: Raphaēl Trouillon

cmjk 2022-11-13

French editor Raphaël Trouillon, faced rejection from the editor status for a month, on the grounds of not aligning with the journal's theme. However, in reality, the paper falls within the scope, and I have also cited multiple articles from the same research task in MEAS. I am now preparing to submit it elsewhere for your reference.

临时演员 2022-11-12

10.29 S TO J - 10.29 South to Junction
11.2 W D - 11.2 Westward Drive
11.10 W D - 11.10 Westward Drive
11.12 U R - 11.12 U Turn

tongtong111 2022-11-11

No need, it's not necessary for the first submission.

来根华子 2022-11-10

8.30 submission, 11.6 revision. May I ask if all co-authors need to confirm their agreement after submitting the revised manuscript? It seems that one author's information has not been synchronized, and they have not received a confirmation email. Also, this manuscript is not listed in the processing section of their EM account's main menu. Will this have any impact?

临时演员 2022-11-09

Brother, is there any news? 11.2 with editor currently has no results.

logicube 2022-11-09

7.14 Submit
8.9 Request for modification
8.28 Submit after modification
10.11 Request for modification
10.15 Submit after second modification
11.3 Request for modification (The reviewer thinks that after modifying the format, the final version can be submitted. I am also a bit confused, shouldn't the editing be responsible for formatting? The editor is asking me to make another change.)
11.3 Submit after third modification
Currently with editor

baladashi 2022-11-03

If it has already been sent to the reviewers, you should receive an email with the subject "Track the status of your submission to Measurement". The email will contain a link where you can check how many reviewers it was sent to, how many reviewers have accepted, and how many have completed the review.

Jy杨 2022-11-03

It will be sent for review in just one week after being handed to the editor. Quite fast.

来根华子 2022-11-01

Hello, may I ask for the detailed status of the journal? How many reviewers was it sent to? Where can I see which reviewers have accepted it? Can I still see it in the EM submission system under the "under review" status?

CAT 2022-10-31

The text is already in English.

Mchen 2022-10-27

Click on the link, there is Chinese customer service available, much more convenient to use.

Mchen 2022-10-27

It depends on the opinions of the editor and reviewers. If they are mostly positive, the editor may feel confident enough to make a decision. However, if the opinions are more neutral, the editor may still need to seek opinions from other reviewers.

棒棒来冲浪 2022-10-27

My first invitation invited over ten reviewers, and three agreed to review. One reviewer disappeared during the second review, so I invited 12 more reviewers, but still no one agreed to review. It has been over five months in total. The editor invited two more, but no one agreed. The invitation has been ongoing, but there is still one reviewer missing.

SF221 2022-10-26

For the first two months, I had two reviewers, but a few days ago it changed to three reviewers. I guess it might not be enough with just two. My brothers have been waiting for a long time, and the two reviewers have also approved it.

ZZT123 2022-10-26

Hello, can't we have two reviewers?

GY Qian 2022-10-25

The speed is quite fast. We had a major revision and a minor revision. In the laboratory, almost all of us submitted at the same time. I have already received feedback for my second revision, but others haven't heard back from the initial reviewer yet. During the initial review, the first reviewer was very responsible and careful. They pointed out some detailed issues that I had checked twice and still hadn't noticed. They also corrected some inaccurate translations of definitions and professional terms. In total, there were nearly 30 issues, including both major and minor ones. With the feedback from the other reviewers, we barely managed to submit on time. The second minor revision mainly addressed formatting issues, and I completed and submitted it on the same day.