Abcnnw 2022-03-05

2.15 submit - This means that something should be submitted or turned in.
2.22 under review - This indicates that something is currently being reviewed or evaluated.

fdgd 2022-03-04

It has been one month with Editor, and during this period, the date changed once in the previous week. What is the situation? It's been a month already, and it hasn't been reviewed yet.

Tedxm 2022-03-02

I want to ask, there are two reviewers in total, one reviewer did not review, and the other one raised several questions. What does the "revise mandatory" given by the editor mean?

材料店小二 2022-02-23

Hello, my state is also like this. May I ask what happened to your article afterwards?

meercy 2022-02-21

The efficiency is very high! Thank you to editor Marco Jan Starink for providing acceptance feedback within less than an hour after submitting the revised manuscript.
Submitted on December 25, 2021.
Received feedback from reviewers on February 2, 2022. There were three reviewers, two of whom suggested minor revisions and pointed out several language issues. One reviewer did not review, and the editor directly gave a request for revision.
Returned revised manuscript on February 16, 2022.
Accepted on February 16, 2022.

是浮生嘞 2022-02-16

2022.2.5 提交 (Submitted on February 5, 2022)
2022.2.9 与编辑 (With editor on February 9, 2022)
2022.2.11 审查中 (Under review on February 11, 2022)

Katherine~xiazi 2022-02-11

Posted on December 23, 2019 → Modified on January 21, 2020 → Returned on February 20, 2020 → Accepted on the same day, February 20, 2020.
Fast review speed, constructive review comments.

秦柰轶 2022-02-02

How long does it take for MSEA to be indexed by SCI after publication?

琛0219 2022-01-22

Submission in mid-October;
Reply for major revisions on December 1st;
Resubmission on December 26th;
Acceptance on January 21st.

xtrnn 2022-01-04

4 reviewers
2020.6.25 submit
2020.6.30 with editor
2020.7.5 with editor
2020.7.6 under review
2020.7.12 under editor evaluation
2020.8.4 under editor evaluation
2020.8.7 under editor evaluation
2020.8.9 under editor evaluation
2020.8.10 reject and resubmit
2020.8.28 revision submit
2020.8.30 under review
2020.9.1 required reviews completed
2020.9.5 required reviews completed
2020.9.8 accept

DRJ333 2021-12-24

The editor who reviewed my manuscript is Prof. Ewald A. Werner. He first reviewed the manuscript, gave a "reject and resubmit" decision, and provided suggestions for revisions. The main request was to reduce the number of figures to below 20 and to improve the formatting of equations, among other things.

After making the necessary revisions, I resubmitted the manuscript and the editor sent it for external review within 2 days. The external review process took 2 months. There were a total of three reviewers, who provided some simple suggestions for minor revisions. I spent 3 days making the revisions and submitted them back. The editor accepted the manuscript the day after submission.

llz 2021-11-29

The rejection was straightforward, without even going through the review process. The speed of the decision was relatively fast. The article itself does not quite meet the standards of MSEA. Being rejected was expected and it was not prolonged or complicated. The person involved remains emotionally stable.
2021.11.17 Submitted to Journal
2021.11.22 With Editor
2021.11.28 Reject

BTXL6L 2021-11-24

Thank you to Ewald A. Werner for being the editor-in-chief and for handling the articles professionally and efficiently.

西工大的小博士 2021-11-19

The editing process took 15 days, but it was directly rejected, stating that the discussion was not in-depth enough. I plan to submit it to JAC instead.

Lightnight 2021-11-16

Hello, may I ask why I have submitted it for 4 days but there is still no response?

jonastang 2021-11-09

There were a total of three reviewers. One reviewer provided minor revisions and answered some small questions. Another reviewer expressed a negative opinion, stating that they didn't believe the paper could be published in its current format. However, their negative feedback only consisted of insignificant questions, so the editor sought a third reviewer for arbitration. This third reviewer provided positive feedback and answered the minor questions.

Lastly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Prof. Ewald A. Werner for his prompt handling of the manuscript. He was strict in his initial requirements and worked quickly in the later stages. I wish him good health.

jonastang 2021-11-09

Jul 20, 2021 submitted to the journal
Jul 21, 2021 with editor
Jul 25, 2021 with editor
Jul 25, 2021 reject & resubmit // Some formulas, language issues
Aug 08, 2021 resubmit
Aug 10, 2021 under review // Probably rejected for review
Aug 17, 2021 under review
Sep 16, 2021 under review // Reviewer 1
Sep 23, 2021 under review // Reviewer 2
Sep 23, 2021 required reviews completed
Sep 27, 2021 under review // Reviewer 3
Oct 22, 2021 revise-mandatory
Nov 06, resubmit
Nov 08, accept

hshshd 2021-11-07

2021-9-7 submitted to journal;
2021-9-9 with editor;
2021-9-11 with editor;
2021-9-18 under review;
2021-10-19 under review;
2021-10-27 Require reviews completed;
2021-11-6 reject;
Two reviewers, one of whom was not very friendly, asked questions that were not difficult to answer, and finally stated that it did not meet the scope of the journal's inclusion; the other reviewer suggested acceptance after minor revisions, but the editor gave a rejection.

xiaosheng 2021-11-06

Come here specifically to fulfill my vow. Submitted on May 30th, one month with editor, then one month under review. Four reviewers provided 50 comments for revision, took one month to make the changes and resubmit. Another month under review, received feedback, three agreed to accept it, while one suggested major revisions. Spent half a month making the revisions and finally submitted. Today, it was finally accepted. Haha, I finally graduated.

材料打工人 2021-11-03

2021-0524 submitted
2021-0527 under review
2021-0802 reject and resubmit
2021-0929 with editor
2021-1001 under review
2021-1010 revise-mandatory
2021-1023 with editor
2021-1026 accept

During this period of time, it took five months. This was my first work during my doctoral period. The first review had minor revisions and a rejection. The editor gave a reject and resubmit with major revisions. The reviewer who rejected the paper raised over 30 questions in the first review, but the second review was mostly satisfactory. Finally, I managed to convince the reviewer who rejected the paper, and the R2 version was accepted without further review. I would like to express special thanks to editor J. Danel Whittenberger for giving me the opportunity for major revisions. He is a very nice person and handles manuscripts very quickly. Results are usually available within three days.

浩南是我 2021-10-27

with editor 14 days, under review 35 days, Required Reviews Completed for one week and still no results.

登菲特 2021-10-27

May I ask how many days it takes for the author with the editor to submit for review?

登菲特 2021-10-26

May I ask if the original poster has submitted their article for review? How many days did it take to submit with the editor in the end?

登菲特 2021-10-26

May I ask if the original poster has submitted for review? Ideally, how many days does it take to submit with an editor?

Never rejected 2021-10-21

Thank you. Mine is also the second time, just recently went through an external review. Good luck!

LawLight_L 2021-10-21

Mine is the second time~ I am still waiting for the external review with no news.

小西花厅 2021-10-18

August 10th - submit
August 13th - with editor
August 15th - reject and resubmit (Seeing the reject made me feel disheartened, but after carefully reading the email, the questions raised were quite simple, so I made some minor revisions and resubmitted)
August 22nd - with editor
August 24th - Under Review (First change of date, I thought the efficiency was quite high)
August 31st - Under Review (Second change of date, changed reviewer, did the reviewer actually complete the review?)
September 6th - Under Review (Third change of date, feeling a bit anxious)
September 13th - Under Review (Fourth change of date, what?!)
October 2nd - Revise (Two reviewers, one raised several small issues; one confirmed there were no problems)
October 14th - with editor (During the National Day holiday, I was playing while also working on improving the English, which caused a slight delay)
October 16th - accept

JK.LM 2021-10-18

May I ask if there are two rounds of review with the editor before submission?

LawLight_L 2021-10-16

Posted on October 3, 2021
With editor on October 4, 2021
With editor on October 10, 2021
Under review on October 15, 2021

ryosho 2021-10-14

Efficiency is high and recently the review process has become stricter, which may also be the reason why the region has been ranked as top in Zone One. The future development is very promising and worth looking forward to.