maoly 2022-09-13

Ah, are there so many bugs in this journal?

Lucker 2022-09-07

May I ask what the situation is and what reasons there are for not allowing dual communication? I just submitted my application, and it also includes dual communication. Thank you.

Nikoresearch 2022-09-05

I have also been with the editor for a month, what is this situation.

不常吃肉 2022-09-05

Continuously with editor

谦 2022-09-03

Is it under review now?

fyj94510 2022-08-29

Hire immediately after 2 months of modification, good journal.

贞肉大大 2022-08-27

2022.7.20 submit to journal
2022.8.27 with editor This status has been for over a month now, I am planning to email the editor to inquire.

King Today 2022-08-14

Very good journal, the reviewers were also very responsible and gave many substantial suggestions. After making the revisions, the quality of the paper has improved significantly.

石佛 2022-08-11

Hello, may I ask how many days it takes to review With editor? Thank you very much!

qwes 2022-08-04

Is it not possible for mine to be dual communication as well?

夏博 2022-08-04

I submitted my manuscript on 5/21, but it was rejected and requested for resubmission. After making the necessary revisions, I resubmitted it on 7/4 and it was accepted on 7/8. The time interval between my submission and acceptance is almost the same as the OP's.

qwes 2022-08-03

Hello, may I ask if your submission is being reviewed now?

June。 2022-08-02

0517 submit
0530 reject and resubmit (Editing issues include language, the number of figures should be less than 20, figures should not have a background color, double communication is not allowed, etc.)
0620 resubmit
0622 mandatory revision (Still regarding the issue of double communication, we initially tried to persuade the editor, but the old man disagreed and explained to us the true meaning of corresponding authorship. Even though double communication is common in MSEA, it is absolutely not allowed here. We must modify according to his instructions. The number of figures has been changed to a total of 22, which he allowed.)
0623 resubmit
0625 under review
0710 mandatory revision (Two reviewers)
0729 revised
0801 accept
The editor is Mr. Ewald A. Werner, a very rigorous scholar from Germany. After reading some comments, I found that this old gentleman is accustomed to reviewing the manuscript first, including the format, language, and figures, which are evaluated at this stage. Then he gives an R&R, but as long as we can make the requested improvements, there shouldn't be any major issues. The manuscripts he is willing to review usually proceed quickly and have a high acceptance rate. Finally, I wish Mr. Werner a long and healthy life.

jonastang 2022-07-25

Excuse me, has it been submitted for review? It's been more than ten days with the editor, why is the speed of MSEA so slow now?

HlZhang 2022-07-19

Feb 09, 2022 Submitted to Journal
Feb 12, 2022 With Editor
Feb 14, 2022 Under Review
Mar 14, 2022 Revise
May 11, 2022 With Editor
May 13, 2022 Under review
May 24, 2022 Revise-mandatory
Jul 13, 2022 With Editor
Jul 14, 2022 Under Review
Jul 16, 2022 Required Reviews Completed
Jul 18, 2022 Accept
***MSEa, a trusted and well-established journal in the field of steel***

changlijun0814@163.com 2022-07-16

22.7.16 with editor Assigned manuscript number

曼阁尼 2022-07-15

5.25 submit
5.28 under review
6.4 under review
6.28 required reviews complete
6.30 revise-mandatory
7.8 revision submission, with editor
7.11 under review
7.13 under review
7.13 required reviews complete
7.15 accept
Editorial processing: Editor-in-chief Enrique J. Lavernia

llllllli 2022-07-15

2022.5.9 under review
2022.6.9 reject and resubmit
2022.6.22 with editor
2022.6.24 under review
2022.7.14 accepted

Translation:
2022.5.9 - Currently being reviewed
2022.6.9 - Rejected and needs to be resubmitted
2022.6.22 - Being reviewed by the editor
2022.6.24 - Currently under review
2022.7.14 - Accepted

changlijun0814@163.com 2022-07-13

2022.7.13 Submitted to Journal. Hoping for positive results. Sent an email stating that there is a large number of manuscripts, so it might take a bit longer.

磕磕绊绊 2022-07-06

Thank you, MSEA!

BMGer 2022-07-06

2022.3.23 Submitted to journal
2022.3.27 With Editor
2022.3.28 Under Review
2022.4.22 Required Reviews Completed
2022.4.30 Reject and Resubmit
Minor revisions and rejection
2022.6.7 Revision Submitted (with Editor)
2022.6.8 With Editor
2022.6.9 Under Review
2022.6.19 Required Reviews Completed
2022.6.20 Revision-mandatory
2022.7.3 Revision Submitted (with Editor)
2022.7.4 With Editor
2022.7.5 Accept
Overall, the process went smoothly, except during the response to the second reviewer's comments. However, I should indeed thank this reviewer for greatly improving the content of my article. Finally, I would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief, Enrique J. Lavernia, for his efficiency and friendly attitude.

肥森多发sci 2022-07-05

2022.3.25 submitted to journal
2022.3.31 under review
2022.5.5 under review
2022.5.7 under review
2022.5.11 reject and resubmit
2022.6.24 with editor
2022.6.27 under review
2022.7.3 revise-mandatory
2022.7.4 accept

During my PhD, this was my first SCI publication. I experienced countless emotions and anxieties throughout the process, but the outcome was ultimately positive. There were a total of three reviewers, who not only provided feedback on basic issues but also offered many suggestions for improving the writing. The editor gave a "reject and resubmit" decision, with a two-month timeframe for revisions. After the second round of revisions, a minor issue was addressed and the manuscript was resubmitted the following day, resulting in immediate acceptance. The journal had strict requirements, particularly regarding English proficiency. I learned a lot during this period, which will greatly assist me in future submissions. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Marco Jan Starink, the editor, for his fast and diligent handling of the manuscript.

蠢森多发sci 2022-07-04

Hello, I have a question. After revising the mandatory, was it sent for external review? I also received this after a major revision. The previous editor wrote, "It will be considered for publication in MSE A provided that it is revised in accord with below comments of the reviewer." Could you please tell me if this means they are being polite or if it implies acceptance after completing the revisions?

栗山空月 2022-06-29

I invited two reviewers, and they provided their review comments in just half a month, which was really fast. There were a total of 10 review comments, and none of them were particularly difficult to address. After resubmitting, the second reviewer was not satisfied with one of the responses, so they asked me to explain it again. After carefully revising and explaining, the paper was submitted again, and it was accepted the next day.

栗山空月 2022-06-29

5.20 submit
5.29 under review
6.15 revise submission
6.21 resubmit
6.23 revise submission
6.26 resubmit
6.27 accept

Translation:
5.20 - Submitted
5.29 - Under review
6.15 - Revision of submission
6.21 - Resubmitted
6.23 - Revision of submission
6.26 - Resubmitted
6.27 - Accepted

雨中听文 2022-06-28

3.04 submit
3.12 under review
5.08 revise minor
6.06 submit
6.12 accept

Translation:
3.04 - Submit
3.12 - Under review
5.08 - Revise minor
6.06 - Submit
6.12 - Accept

Abcnnw 2022-06-26

2.15 submit
2.22 under review
3.15 under review
3.26 under review
3.30 under review
4.15 under review
4.30 under review
5.15 under review
6.15 revise
6.23 submit
6.25 accept
Laser and forging interdisciplinary research could not find reviewers. After significant revisions in the last week, it was directly accepted within 2 days.

不醒人士 2022-06-20

Submitted on June 5th, it took a week to submit and another week in the editing process, but ultimately it was rejected. It was believed to be in line with the journal's focus and had some fresh ideas, but the depth of analysis and discussion was insufficient. It has been resubmitted to another magazine.

Abcnnw 2022-06-19

4 months under review 9 times ??

雨秋飞一 2022-06-14

with editor 1 month, under review 2 months, during the review period the dates changed twice, result unknown