Verified Reviews - MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

SCI2021 2022-08-09

This magazine is too slow.

多兰 2022-08-04

With one and a half months, it took one and a half months for the review, and they still rejected it after three months. It's not conscientious enough.

爱国 2022-08-03

2022.4.18 Submitted to journal
2022.4.22 with editor
2022.6.2 under review
2022.7.20 reject

Translation:

2022.4.18 Submitted to journal
2022.4.22 with editor
2022.6.2 under review
2022.7.20 rejected

唯一就唯一咯 2022-07-31

2022/03/12 - Submitted to the journal
2022/6/05 - Required reviews completed
2022/06/17 - Revisions submitted to the journal
2022/7/02 - Under review
2022/07/13 - Required reviews completed
2022/07/30 - Accepted

多兰 2022-07-30

7.30 is currently being evaluated.

爱国 2022-07-15

2022.4.18 Submitted to Journal
2022.4.22 With editor
2022.6.2 Under review

Translation:

2022.4.18 Submitted to Journal
2022.4.22 With editor
2022.6.2 Under review

多兰 2022-07-04

May I ask what is the final result?

多兰 2022-07-02

7.2 under review.

多兰 2022-06-22

6.22 with editor (reminder again), plan to withdraw the submission.

sues168 2022-06-20

6.20 under review

张茂 2022-06-17

May I ask, when the review is completed, can the author's information be changed?

sues168 2022-06-13

6.13 Under review

多兰 2022-06-13

I'm sorry, but I'm unable to understand the phrase "6.13 with editor." Could you please provide more context or clarify your request?

sues168 2022-06-06

5.12 submitted
5.16 with editor
6.6 under review
Waiting to receive the degree certificate, it's a bit slow.

JinHong G 2022-06-06

The speed is very fast. Last time I submitted, two reviewers made revisions and the editor rejected it.
This time I am making a comeback with a paper that came from JAC.
Submitted on 5.22.
Received by the editor on 5.25.
Under review on 5.29 (system shows 2+ reviewers).
Review required to be completed by 6.3.
The speed is indeed fast. Hopefully, I will receive good news.

多兰 2022-06-06

6.6 with editor

多兰 2022-05-28

5.28 with editor

梅花盛开 2022-05-21

It's fine, it didn't waste your time.

梅花盛开 2022-05-21

Not more than two months, everything is normal, this is my experience. Be patient and wait.

多兰 2022-05-21

This journal is really slow, everyone needs to consider it carefully before submitting. I had my ASS (possibly a specific abbreviation for a paper) rejected and was recommended to resubmit. I will share an update once a week.
5.09 submitted
5.12 with editor
5.21 with editor

?8 2022-05-12

Posted on October 28, 2021 and accepted on April 1, 2022. Due to the Lunar New Year, there was no time to supplement the data. Requesting a one-month extension. Apart from the longer duration with the editor (nearly one month), everything else is fine, with two reviewers.

MiaAmelia 2022-05-12

4.1 under review is still under review.

泽铭sama 2022-04-20

17th proof, received email notification online at 23.48 on the night of the 19th.

樊** 2022-04-15

Why is your "under review" so fast, it's been a month and still with the editor?

泽铭sama 2022-04-13

Everyone says that this journal is slow, but personally, I think it's quite fast. It usually takes around 30 days to get the results. The problem is that it's difficult to find reviewers nowadays, as many people are unwilling to review papers. For instance, when I had to make revisions, the status and deadline kept changing every day, and I had to switch between five or six reviewers at least.

泽铭sama 2022-04-13

2.9 submission;
2.12 under review
3.15 minor revisions requested, the first reviewer raised a few minor questions, the second reviewer suggested accepting the paper directly, the editor couldn't find the third reviewer, so we made minor revisions to save time, but it was made clear that the third reviewer will be sought after the resubmission;
3.21 resubmission;
3.23 under review, possibly unable to find a suitable reviewer, so the status date kept changing until 3.29, minor revisions made on 4.12, a newly assigned reviewer corrected the grammar and the paper was returned on the same day, accepted today at noon!

小白 2022-04-01

Thank you, it's not easy in half a year. As long as you can achieve something, it's a good result. Research personnel, keep up the good work.

小白 2022-03-28

2021.8.30 submit to journal
2021.9.1 edit your submission
2021.9.1 submit to journal
2021.9.6 with editor
2022.2.22 under review
2022.3.9 under review
2022.3.22 required Reviews Completed
2022.3.23 Revise Minor Revision
2022.3.24 Return for Revision
2022.3.24 with editor
2022.3.26 under review
......Continue waiting, this is the first article after starting the job, the speed is a bit slow.

香蕉Allen 2022-03-25

Three days later, the manuscript will be submitted. It will take about 30 days to receive the first round of comments. There are three reviewers, with the first reviewer paying more attention to experimental details and raising 11 questions. The second reviewer raised one question, while the third reviewer is interested in the mechanism and raised 10 questions. Overall, the review process is quite fast and not as slow as rumored online. The editor is friendly, and the reviewers have also provided positive evaluations for the article. They have given 30 days to make revisions, and currently, we are in the process of replying to each reviewer.

JinHong G 2022-03-25

Good luck, it will be done quickly once edited.
3.24 decision in process.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started