Verified Reviews - KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

wuwf 2022-04-18

How long does it take to accept a paper for online publication?

Hellen 2022-04-18

2022.2.27 submitted to journal
2022.2.28 with editor
2022.3.10 with editor
2022.4.5 under review
2022.4.17 decision in process
(I hope to have a chance for revision~/First SCI paper)

不羁 2022-04-10

Apr 05, 2022 Submitted to kbs
Apr 09, 2022 With Editor
Recording the submission timeline for reference.
It has been accepted, taking a total of 7 months.

疆龙 2022-04-06

May I ask how long it takes for external review after you submit the manuscript? And how much time was taken for the first review?

疆龙 2022-04-06

May I ask how long it took for your submission to go from "With Editor" to "Under Review"? It has been almost half a month for me, and it hasn't been sent for external review yet.

qweqw 2022-04-06

The review speed and response speed are extremely fast. The suggestions provided by the reviewers are also reliable. After two rounds of careful revisions, the paper was accepted for publication.

cykaaa 2022-04-06

Supplement:
Submitted on 20211124
Received major revisions after the first review on 20220211
Accepted after the revised submission on 20220405

cykaaa 2022-04-06

20220405 conditionally accepted. Thank you!

对不起,该用户昵称已被注册 2022-04-03

The text translates to: "The articles we have received far exceed the range we can handle. My understanding is that there are too many articles received."

寥寥数日 2022-03-24

KBS went through a whole year, and finally got hired.

QinS 2022-03-21

How can I determine whether it is a major repair or a minor repair?

兔子要穿裤子 2022-03-20

Posted on November 21, 2021, received on March 19, 2022, with one major revision and one minor revision in between. The modification suggestions from the three reviewers were all very professional, so students who want to submit can give it a try.
- November 21, 2021: Submitted
- November 23, 2021: With editor
- November 25, 2021: Under review
- January 14, 2021: Revised
- January 25, 2021: Under review
- February 11, 2021: Revised
- March 5, 2022: Under review
- March 15, 2022: Decision in process
- March 17, 2022: Under review (I guess it's because they are waiting for responses from multiple reviewers)
- March 18, 2022: Decision in process
- March 19, 2022: Completed - accept
Wishing the journal and all of us the best! Let's keep up the good work!

JLOVEQ 2022-03-20

My paper, submitted in August 2021, has been sitting in the hands of the editor for two months. After being reminded, it was sent for external review. Until now, it is still under external review. Why is this journal so slow?

thomaslin 2022-03-18

Hello, how many times will three reviewers receive the completed required reviews? It seems like for each additional reviewer's response starting from two reviewers, one additional completed required review will be received.

abc 2022-03-16

3.2 is currently being reviewed.
3.15 required reviews have been completed.

孙无常 2022-03-13

KBS:
2022.1.9 submitted to journal
2022.1.10 With Editor
2022.1.23 Under Review
2022.2.14 Under Review
2022.2.20 Required Reviews Completed
2022.2.24 Completed - Reject

Two reviewers, one rejected. The main reason for rejection was that one reviewer believed that the paper lacked technical depth and experimental analysis. The process was fast, and the rejection speed was what caught their attention. Although it was rejected, some of the reviewer's comments have some value for reference and modification.

thomaslin 2022-03-08

May I ask how many reviewers are there in total for this?

zhouhao 2022-02-20

I started the decision-making process on 1.28, and until now, there is still no outcome.

abc 2022-02-18

2022/2/15 Submission
2022/2/16 with editor

02520 2022-02-17

First review modification, second review on February 8th. Decision in process until now. Any comrades experiencing the same situation?

TheoYan 2022-02-14

Your speed is too fast!!! I submitted it on January 13th, and the required reviews were completed on February 14th. Isn't it a bit too fast...

smallreed 2022-02-09

The submission result was chosen incorrectly; it should have been accepted after major revisions.

smallreed 2022-02-09

Four reviewers, their opinions are constructive, and the process from submission to acceptance is quite fast. It is recommended for researchers engaged in artificial intelligence research to submit their work! The future looks promising.

Gov 2022-02-09

Hahaha. I don't care, our intelligent optimization algorithm is still considered top-notch! If you graduate and come to a university, this is also a legitimate SCI Q1 area!

xiaowei123456 2022-02-08

Did your brother get rejected? Haha, what's up with him not being satisfied with this or that? He has published several papers in PAMI and even in top-tier conferences of CCF A class. Leave the DOI of the articles so that I can wait to read them.

NLP菜狗 2022-02-06

Looking for a laugh? You don't seriously think it's a top publication, right? Just a trashy C-tier magazine.

NLP菜狗 2022-02-06

"Come for comedy? Don't tell me you actually think it's a top publication. It's just a garbage C magazine."

Gov 2022-02-03

The text translates to: "Submitted in July 2021, it quickly went under review. The first review took about four months with three reviewers. They gave me a month to revise, suggesting that I do it quickly, or else I wouldn't know how much longer it would take. I submitted it on the last day. After going back, it took less than a week for the RRC (reviewer recommendation committee), and then I waited and waited. A month later, it was in the decision process, and on the same day, it was accepted. Well, it was relatively fast, luckily."

cykaaa 2022-01-15

Submitted on November 24, 2021
Under review as of December 21, 2021
Under review as of January 14, 2022
Hope for better luck.

TTYM 2022-01-08

Submitted on January 9th, 2021.
Accepted on January 7th, 2022.
Received reviewers' comments for the first review in November, which required a major revision and a minor revision.
One month later, received minor revisions for the second review.
A whole year.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More