jaden 2022-09-08

Could you please tell me how many times you have changed under review and how many reviewers there are for the first review?

碧海星空 2022-09-08

It's getting harder and harder. After completing the reviews, it went under reviews again.

在吃草莓 2022-09-08

The first editor gave two revision periods: "Please note that we allow 42 days for the first author revision and 40 days for any additional author revisions that are required." I'm wondering if it should be counted as 42 days or 80 days. However, the submission system has given a deadline of 60 days. I want to know how to calculate the deadline. As someone with procrastination tendencies, I am feeling frustrated.

sweets 2022-09-02

Hello, may I ask how many comments you had during the revision stage?

nwulq 2022-09-01

2022-2-10 submit
2022-2-24 with editor
2022-3-11 under review
2022-6-08 decision in process
2022-6-10 revise
2022-6-15 r1 submit
2022-6-18 with editor
2022-6-20 under review
2022-8-11 revise&conditionally accept(language editing)
2022-8-29 r2 submit
2022-8-29 completed accept

Translated text:
2022-2-10 submit
2022-2-24 with editor
2022-3-11 under review
2022-6-08 decision in process
2022-6-10 revise
2022-6-15 r1 submit
2022-6-18 with editor
2022-6-20 under review
2022-8-11 revise&conditionally accept(language editing)
2022-8-29 r2 submit
2022-8-29 completed accept

sweets 2022-08-30

May I ask which language service is provided by Elsevier?

Storyandwine 2022-08-24

0527 Major renovation
0625 Second submission
0730 Second review completed, minor revision (language)
0818 Third submission
0819 Accepted (AC)

se7esx 2022-08-23

22.5.21 submit
22.6.5 under review
22.7.12 reject
It was split between two reviewers, one of whom had no understanding of the field and gave a lot of negative comments on grammar and formatting. The other reviewer's comments were very fair and helpful for the article. It's strange that it was rejected. Even if they asked for major revisions, it would have been better... Sigh, I'm eager to publish, so forget it... o(╥﹏╥)o

蒙D2023 2022-08-18

May I ask for clarification? As I am using a LaTeX template, should the revised manuscript in my revision email be in the docx format? Do I need to submit two versions for the revision (LaTeX manuscript and a docx version with colored annotations)?

leesoon 2022-08-18

I also encountered the same problem. May I ask how to use Elsevier's language services?

疆龙 2022-08-18

Congratulations, it has been almost five months since the submission. The "under review" status has changed five times for me. I hope to share your good luck and receive acceptance smoothly. May I ask how many reviewers' comments did you finally receive?

疆龙 2022-08-18

I hope everything goes smoothly.

ticky_yan 2022-08-18

- 2022.1.10 submitted to journal & under review
- 2022.2.10 under review
- 2022.3.15 under review
- 2022.4.3 under review
- 2022.4.28 under review
- 2022.5.22 under review
- 2022.6.20 under review
- 2022.7.10 required reviews completed
- 2022.7.12 decision in process
- 2022.7.12 evening: revise
- 2022.8.10 revision submitted & with editor & under review
- 2022.8.16 required reviews completed
- 2022.8.17 decision in process
- 2022.8.17 accept

Translation:
- 2022.1.10 submitted to journal & under review
- 2022.2.10 under review
- 2022.3.15 under review
- 2022.4.3 under review
- 2022.4.28 under review
- 2022.5.22 under review
- 2022.6.20 under review
- 2022.7.10 required reviews completed
- 2022.7.12 decision in process
- 2022.7.12 evening: revise
- 2022.8.10 revision submitted & with editor & under review
- 2022.8.16 required reviews completed
- 2022.8.17 decision in process
- 2022.8.17 accept

保佑我三年毕业 2022-08-16

4.19: Submission
5.27: First review result, three reviewers, two with positive feedback, raised many questions, and made careful revisions and responses one by one (with the help of the supervisor).
7.28: Second review result, hardly any issues. Suggested polishing, which was done.
8.16: Submitted after polishing, accepted.

Overall, the editor was responsible, the reviewers were reliable, and the feedback and results were provided very quickly.

nwulq 2022-08-12

Hello, sir. May I ask about the editor's comment in my review? "Revise (Including Language Editing)" Does this mean they are requesting language services? Because my manuscript has already been edited by a native English speaker, is further polishing needed?

kkfc 2022-08-11

The conference expansion's repetition rate exceeded the limit. I suspect they didn't read the instructions in the cover letter.

kkfc 2022-08-09

8.5 submit
8.6 with editor (editor-in-chief)
Hope to be reviewed

sweets 2022-08-09

Brother, what is your current situation now?

sweets 2022-08-09

Two months, it's so fast!

加载中 2022-08-06

Editors and reviewers are both very fast in their handling. The reviewers paid great attention to detail, making two revisions, adding many experiments, and refining language issues.

Vicissitude 2022-08-01

Hello, I recently submitted to this journal as well. It is currently in the "under review" status. However, when I checked the "track your submission" feature on Elsevier, it shows that no reviewers have accepted the review yet. The "under review" status has been updated three times with different dates. I wanted to ask if you have also encountered this situation.

lucas2022 2022-08-01

Bro, I wanted to ask if your first submitted manuscript was in Word, .tex file, or PDF? I haven't submitted to Elsevier journals before, and I submitted in PDF format. Three days later, it went straight to "decision in process." I'm not sure if it got rejected due to the file format issue.

努力发SCI的东 2022-07-29

Two weeks, the mentor still has 3 papers under review. Taking more time will result in applying for an extension, but all are being reviewed carefully.

BeCalm 2022-07-29

May I ask, when KBS assigns manuscripts to reviewers, how many days do they usually give for review?

Leemuzi 2022-07-16

2021.7.23 Submission
2022.1.16 Major Revision
2022.2.20 Minor Revision
2022.5.27 Conditional Acceptance
2022.6.23 Minor Revision
2022.7.16 Acceptance
Summary: The reviewers' opinions are very professional and sharp, indicating that the editor has found reviewers specialized in the specific field.

jimcurry 2022-07-16

7.16 Currently, it is RRC, hoping to receive the first review comments quickly.

jelly土豆泥 2022-07-15

Submitted at 1:30 PM on July 13, 2022 and rejected at 9:30 PM on July 13, 2022.
The efficiency is surprisingly fast, great job!
I attempted to submit a workshop scheduling using a multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm, as it was published in a related journal. It didn't waste any time. The quick rejection made me briefly doubt if my writing wasn't up to par.

朱颖颖 2022-07-15

Submitting at 1:30 PM on July 13th, 2022, and rejected at 9:30 PM on July 13th. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Knowledge-Based Systems. I regret to inform you that your manuscript does not have the scientific significance required by this journal and we must therefore reject it. The efficiency of the process is surprisingly fast, and I commend you for that! I attempted to submit my workshop scheduling using the multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm, as it has been published in a related journal. It didn't take up much time. The quick rejection made me doubt if my writing was not up to par.

乔纳森 2022-07-13

The key is how to know that one person has completed the review.

jimcurry 2022-07-11

Does it only take three days for a submission to be reviewed and completed? Is it that fast?