Kol_xr 2021-08-26

In the hands of the editor for over half a month, in the hands of the responsible editor for over a month, it has just been submitted for review. It feels like they went on vacation.

大王的煎饼果子 2021-08-23

What is the current status? I have been submitting for over a month, and it has been in the hands of the editor all this time.

大王的煎饼果子 2021-08-23

May I ask what the current status is? I submitted it on July 21st, and there was one editing change in between. It is still in the hands of the editor now. It has been over a month.

揭然 2021-08-12

Understood, the review comments have been returned, requiring major revisions.

揭然 2021-08-12

Submitted on April 20th, it has been nearly four months and it is still under review. Yesterday, I suddenly noticed that the co-authors who are not the corresponding authors cannot see the status of the article. Is it the same for everyone?

李小虫子 2021-08-11

What is the current status now?

小A啊 2021-08-09

It has been almost two months since I submitted it... I have been "with editor" all this time... Sigh ╯﹏╰

NullAtticus 2021-08-04

The JSV Mechanics subcategory has dropped to Q2. Jobs in the mechanics field will not be prioritized for investment in JSV. It is estimated that a vicious cycle will occur in the future...

小A啊 2021-07-20

I also submitted it for a month and it still hasn't been reviewed. It's really frustrating.

楼船夜雪 2021-07-15

It can be considered as a top journal in the field of acoustics. The requirements for difficulty and innovation are both very high. After being rejected and resubmitted, and after making significant revisions, it was finally accepted! The comments from the reviewers were very valuable!

Kol_xr 2021-07-12

It has been half a month since I submitted, but it is still "submitted to journal". Is the recent progress really slow?

zholm 2021-07-01

This rises, that rises, other journals rise quickly, so it falls behind.

科研小渣渣 2021-07-01

The impact factor of JSV is too low this time, and one small category unexpectedly dropped to JCRQ2 for the first time. Personally, I think this is definitely a great journal with a high acceptance difficulty. The editor-in-chief should reflect on why the impact factor is not increasing.

SL666 2021-06-22

avec éditeur (French) - with editor (English)

郢鸟 2021-06-22

Love and hate, one cannot deny that the recognition of vibration direction is indeed high, but the impact factor is not increasing, and the annual publication volume is fixed at over 500 articles. Whether to submit it oneself or have friends submit it, I have received professional opinions from fellow researchers, and the reply to their letters is longer than the content of the paper itself. The third and fourth reviews have become routine.

liyuehao 2021-04-08

Nov 26, 2020 submitted
Jan 18, 2021 reject Three reviewers, one fair, suggested major revisions, one pointed out some issues, possibly due to my lack of clarity, and found some misunderstandings, and another reviewer suggested minor modifications, which normally would require major revisions. Then the editor rejected it. Following the reviewers' opinions, I made revisions point by point, marked the modified parts in red, and resubmitted. I also felt that the article had greatly improved.

Jan 28, 2021 submitted
Apr 07, 2021 accept It was still the same editor and the same three reviewers. They felt that all the issues had been adequately addressed, and then accepted it. Although it may seem like a direct acceptance, the whole process took more than four months. It was the first article, and after several twists and turns, it was finally accepted.

代大爷们儿哥 2021-03-29

2020-12-01 First submission.
2021-01-16 Returned with minor revisions.
2021-03-04 Submitted again after making my own modifications.
2021-03-29 Received confirmation notification from the system.

Process of minor revisions:
Two reviewers.
The first reviewer recommended several recent literature references that I had overlooked, but all other items were minor and easy to address.
The second reviewer raised some questions, and the corresponding modifications were not difficult. However, one of the items requested that I compare my analytical results with those obtained from commercial software simulations, which I disagreed with. Therefore, I did not make the requested modification, but instead provided my reasons in the response.

科研垃圾 2021-03-04

There are several young scholars in the industry who have a certain reputation. They were directly rejected when they submitted their work, without even being reviewed. They then decided to submit their work to the International Journal of Solid and Structures.

科研垃圾 2021-01-27

The editor-in-chief has great power, including the ability to directly reject manuscripts. The reason for rejection is that the manuscript lacks innovation.

小米粥824 2021-01-24

Received 20 Mar 2020
Reject - The self-citation rate is too high. Please make modifications and resubmit.

Received 24 May 2020
Revised 8 December 2020 - Major revisions were made, including non-dimensionalization of the entire work and the addition of several references requested by the reviewer to address specific issues.

Accepted 29 December 2020.