哈哈王 2021-08-28

Congratulations, host! I also want to come and share in the good fortune.

黎塞留卿 2021-08-26

On July 20th, I submitted the manuscript, and then received a formatted modification email a couple of days later. After making the suggested modifications and adding a formatted modification file, I sent it back. The next day, it was under review, and on August 6th, I received the reviewer's comments. I made some experimental additions and replied to the reviewer's comments. On August 19th, it was accepted. Overall, the processing speed was very fast, which may be attributed to the fact that many people are working in the same research area. After all, a previous manuscript I submitted was rejected within a week, so the speed was also very fast. There are many detailed articles on JPS, and it is also a top journal in the battery field. I hope the journal continues to improve (Editor Jie Xiao is very friendly!).

hylfd 2021-07-01

May I ask what happened to the original poster's article later on?

波澜壮阔 2021-06-11

5.5 Submission
5.16 Feedback for revisions - one minor revision, one major revision
6.7 Return
6.10 Acceptance
This time went really smoothly, JPS's review process is really fast. I recommend everyone to submit their work quickly.

Woody0524 2021-05-29

Hello, it seems that Elsevier now requires the submission of an author declaration when submitting a manuscript. Do you have a template for it?

yjfyjf 2021-05-11

When did the one above submit for review? It has been 22 days for me, still with editor.

yjfyjf 2021-05-08

It has been almost 3 weeks since submission, still with the editor, sigh!!!

hylfd 2021-04-20

Hello, may I ask what should be paid attention to when submitting to JPS? For example, do we need to cite multiple articles from JPS or specify which parts of the article need to be written in detail?

hhkk 2021-04-06

It shouldn't be like this. Although Chinese people write a lot and have a good reputation and quality, will it still improve?

hhkk 2021-04-06

Will the impact factor of 21 continue to rise? Can it be promoted back to the first tier after being downgraded to the second tier?

加尔文 Holld 2021-04-05

This journal has a slow review process. It took three months for my manuscript to receive the review comments.

你好，陌生人 2021-04-02

1.18 Submission
1.20 Technical review did not pass, returned for modification
2.4 Returned with modification suggestions, two minor changes
3.6 Returned
3.27 Accepted

做科研有点难 2021-03-28

What is the probability after sending it for review? It has been more than twenty days, and I am anxious.

米玉米233 2021-03-26

I have submitted twice. The first time, it took 26 days with the editor. The editor rejected it, requesting language polishing. After revising it, I resubmitted on March 5th. The submission status has been "with editor" all this time. This speed is too slow, I'm close to tears.

一只工科女 2021-03-26

Already been rejected.

小泽哥 2021-03-24

May I ask how the 9-day classmates with the editor are doing now?

小泽哥 2021-03-24

How are you all doing with the editor?

化工的处境 2021-03-22

I have also been a week.

zzmu 2021-03-21

Has it been submitted for review now?

一只工科女 2021-03-14

Why hasn't there been any progress on my submission with editor for 10 days? How many days has it been for everyone else's submission with editor?

一只工科女 2021-03-14

Ah ah ah, has it been a month with the editor? Mine has already been with the editor for nine days, I'm crying.

冷山 2021-02-18

May I ask if there is any news from the editor in a month?

654321x 2021-02-13

Hello, may I ask if the journal requires the use of their provided template for the author statement when uploading the revised manuscript? I uploaded the author statement but it was sent back. If you have a moment, could you please let me know? Thank you.

Woody0524 2021-02-08

Submitted on December 6th.
With the editor for about two weeks, not sure if they will be on holiday for Christmas.
Under review for a month.
Accepted after two minor revisions, with mostly positive feedback and few issues to address.
After making modifications requested by JPS, it went under review for four to five days, then showed "Required review completed", and was accepted on February 8th.
Previously, it had been under review for a month in Energy Storage Materials, but due to lack of innovation. However, it was revised based on the reviewer's comments.
ESM still requires innovation and breakthroughs, and the paper's content should be detailed and explained clearly.

academic worker 2021-02-02

It is like this, it feels like the final decision of the article needs to be reviewed by the chief editor (and they usually handle it on weekends) ~ OP, just wait patiently, good luck!

123123 2021-01-23

The text translates to: "After 10 days of reviewing, it shows that the required reviews are completed. There has been no new update until today. Is it still with the editor?"

克罗地亚 2021-01-22

Why am I still "with editor" after a month, while yours is very fast? I'm truly envious.

academic worker 2021-01-21

You can follow the public account "学之策" to learn about real-time impact factors.

daiviee 2021-01-13

As of 2020/01/13, the JPS instant impact factor is 8.734.