布鲁斯星辰 2022-05-25

I don't know why, but it has been over a week since the review comments came back. The editor still hasn't replied with any information.

幽谷百合 2022-05-19

Has already submitted to the journal for three days. I don't know how fast this journal is.

拼嘻嘻 2022-05-16

It has been 16 days since I completed the required reviews, but still no news. This is frustrating.

xifeng 2021-12-21

2021.8.15 Submission
2021.8.19 Review
2021.9.13 Major Revision
2021.10.17 Return for Modification
2021.12.04 Acceptance

Arther 2021-11-29

jms's style is getting higher and higher, no longer giving opportunities for review.

Devil-lsq 2021-11-25

Normally, after submitting for a month, I should have received the review comments from the first review. Why am I still seeing "required review completed"?

shenquan 2021-11-18

2021.9.15 Submission
2021.10.8 Edited for major revisions
2021.11.8 Returned for rework
2021.11.12 Formatting revised
2021.11.16 Accepted

CHANX 2021-10-17

The given text is already in English: "Oct 16, 2021 accept."

CHANX 2021-10-11

Oct 8, 2021 revision (some minor issues in the references)
Oct 10, 2021 revision submitted to journal. Looking forward to good luck.

CHANX 2021-10-04

August 25, 2021 CEJ editor recommended transferring to JMS.
August 31, 2021 submitted to the journal.
September 2, 2021 with editor.
September 6, 2021 under review.
September 18, 2021 under review.
September 27, 2021 major revision.
October 4, 2021 revision submitted to journal. Good luck!

能发几篇？ 2021-09-13

JMS has always been a journal that I wanted to submit to. Compared to other journals, this one is considered a top journal in the field. The comments provided by the reviewers were really helpful in improving the quality of the article. They were able to enhance the article from a mechanistic perspective. I hope JMS continues to improve.
Jun 20, 2021 Submit to the journal
Jun 22, 2021 With Editor
Jun 29, 2021 Under Review
Aug 06, 2021 Major Revision
Aug 23, 2021 Revision Submitted to Journal
Aug 23, 2021 With Editor
Aug 25, 2021 Under Review
Sep 8, 2021 required reviewers complete
Sep 12, 2021 Accept

能发几篇？ 2021-09-13

JMS is a journal that I have always wanted to submit to. Compared to other journals, this one can be considered a top journal in the field. The comments provided by the reviewers were truly helpful in improving the quality of the article. They were able to suggest improvements from a mechanistic perspective. I hope JMS continues to improve.

Jun 20, 2021: Submitted to the journal
Jun 22, 2021: Under the review of the editor
Jun 29, 2021: Under review
Aug 06, 2021: Major revision required
Aug 23, 2021: Revision submitted to the journal
Aug 23, 2021: Under the review of the editor
Aug 25, 2021: Under review
Sep 8, 2021: Required reviewers complete
Sep 12, 2021: Accepted

承欢晦慕 2021-09-08

The editorial office received the article on June 17th and sent it for review. A major revision was received on July 28th. There were a total of 12 comments from 2 reviewers. The revised article was sent back on August 13th and accepted for publication on September 5th. This journal is quite fast in terms of speed. It is recommended that everyone polish their language before submitting their articles.

大龄女博士 2021-09-01

2021.5.20 submit to journal
2021.6.13 major revise
2021.7.26 submit revised manuscript
2021.8.16 minor revise
2021.8.31 accept

Translation:

2021.5.20 - Submitted to the journal
2021.6.13 - Major revisions
2021.7.26 - Submitted revised manuscript
2021.8.16 - Minor revisions
2021.8.31 - Accepted

Isabella610 2021-08-30

2021.8.25 submit to journal
2021.8.27 with editor
2021.8.28 under review
2021.8.29 under review

爱枣儿 2021-07-14

May I ask, is "Under Review" referring to the editor's review or is it being prepared for external review? Thank you.

爱枣儿 2021-07-14

May I ask, what does "Under Review" mean? Does it indicate that the editor is reviewing it or preparing for submission? Thank you.

小邹邹 2021-07-06

2020.1.19 Received
2020.1.25 Submitted for review
2020.1.26 Received for review under review
20202.3.20 Major revision, mainly language and three editors raised a lot of questions (total of four, one not reviewed)
Caught up in the epidemic, applied for an extension
2021.3.20 Submitted to journal
2021.3.22 With editor
2021.4.16 Under review
2020.6.23 Major revision
2021.6.26 Submitted to journal
2021.7.6 Accepted

能发几篇？ 2021-06-29

Excuse me, has this article been with the editor for a long time? It has been a week already.

能发几篇？ 2021-06-29

Is it that the editor is on vacation or something?

不想再等了 2021-06-28

What's your current situation now? It's been five days since I've been with the editor.

能发几篇？ 2021-06-27

Posted on June 20th, it has been a week and it is still "with editor". Can anyone please explain why it has been "with editor" for so long? Does it mean there is little hope for it?

easonzk 2021-01-11

The process was quite tortuous, but luckily I encountered a very nice editor. The first time I submitted, the editor gave me a "reject and invite to resubmit" decision. From the rejection letter, it was evident that the editor was interested in the results of my experiment. The editor mentioned that my results were good, but my writing perspective had a problem. They stated that the angles I had written about had already been analyzed by others and had mature conclusions. Therefore, there wasn't much innovation. They suggested that I write from angles such as 1.2.3 and include additional experimental aspects. The editor provided detailed suggestions and advised me to revise and resubmit after conducting the supplementary experiments. (They provided more than ten suggestions).

Following the editor's advice, I supplemented the experiments and rewrote the article, and submitted it again.

On the third day of the resubmission, the editor sent it for external review. The external review took about 20 days and involved two reviewers. Their opinions required major revisions.

After incorporating the major revisions, it was sent back to the same two reviewers the next day. One of the reviewers mentioned that I had made good improvements and it could be accepted. The other reviewer suggested some further improvements to the highlights. Therefore, the editor requested minor revisions. After completing the minor revisions, the article was accepted.