123SHHBHJBC 2022-09-15

I'm almost approaching two months, I guess I am just an editor.

歪歪 2022-09-15

My review status has not changed since July 3rd. It has been dragging on for three months.

123SHHBHJBC 2022-09-15

You wouldn't have edited it with me, right? There has always been only one reviewer accepting the manuscript. That reviewer has been taking a long time to return the manuscript, and afterwards, there haven't been any new invitations for reviewers. There has been no change at all.

歪歪 2022-09-13

After reviewing for more than 70 days, they are still reviewing. It would be better if they just rejected me. This is too dragging on.

香某瓜 2022-09-06

I am one of the three reviewers. Two recommended revisions and one rejected the submission. The editor's decision was a rejection with an invitation to resubmit. The reviewer who rejected the paper provided quite a few suggestions, which overall greatly improved the quality of the article. Seeing your situation, I suddenly feel that mine is not a big deal. It's really outrageous to have a rejection even after five revisions. Is it such a struggle to submit articles nowadays?

歪歪 2022-09-06

JMS is really showing off now.

时代鲁迅 2022-09-06

After being in the "with editor" state for over a month, it finally moved to "under review". Then, one week later, the required reviews were completed. However, the status has been stagnant since then, and it has been almost two weeks now.

歪歪 2022-09-05

It has been over 60 days under review, and the status has not changed at all. Sigh.

Haki 2022-09-02

How are you doing now?

Haki 2022-09-02

8.23 Submission
8.25 with editor
Until now, 9.2 is still with editor
Oh my goodness

ZJChao 2022-08-29

The quality of the journal goes without saying. It is a top journal in the field of membranes and is listed in the first zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). It is also a Topq journal. It has been rejected by ACS-AMI, Power source, Colloid and Interface, and Carbohydrate Polymers, but fortunately, JMS was chosen in the end and it turned out to be successful. Everyone should not be discouraged and can give it a try.

2022.6.21 Submitted to the journal
2022.6.22 Under the editor's review
2022.6.28 Under review
2022.8.22 Major revision
2022.8.25 Submitted the revised version to the journal
2022.8.29 Accepted

Overall, the efficiency is quite high. The editor will carefully search for reviewers, and the reviewers are also very professional, which greatly improves the quality of the article.

歪歪 2022-08-29

Everyone, will the status change during the under review period? Is there anyone else who, like me, has been under review for 2 months without any changes in status?

歪歪 2022-08-12

I am too slow, and I don't have confidence.

WilliamZZ 2022-08-09

I feel a bit overwhelmed by this, and I have no idea what to expect.

歪歪 2022-08-09

My 7.3 submission is still showing that none of the reviewers have accepted the manuscript for review.

歪歪 2022-08-07

The speed is so fast, I'm so envious.

123SHHBHJBC 2022-08-06

Translation: Submitted on 7.25, under review since 7.28, but only one reviewer is accepting the review and it's causing delays.

WilliamZZ 2022-08-06

The translation of the given text into English is as follows:

"Results of the submission are unknown.
19 July with editor
24 July under review
5 Aug required reviews completed
Feels like it's going fast, starting to get a bit anxious."

歪歪 2022-08-01

It has been a month, and it is still under review. I should say that the review invitation has been sent.

时代鲁迅 2022-07-30

Approximately 11 days were spent on submission, and it took a long time for the return. It took more than 10 days to reach a decision after the required reviewers completed their reviews. There were a total of 5 reviewers. There were many modifications, and the suggestions made by the experts were very helpful in improving the quality of the paper. A 21-day revision deadline was given, which was very tight. Some additional analysis was added later, and the response file reached nearly 50 pages. Over 10,000 words were written, and it was checked repeatedly six times. Several all-nighters were pulled, but it was finally completed. Approximately 1/3 of the article's content was changed after the revisions. It has been 11 days since the revisions were submitted, and it is still "with editor," with the outcome unknown.

拼嘻嘻 2022-07-26

2022.4.15 with editor
2022.4.28 under review
2022.5.19 rejection (with resubmission invited, a total of 6 reviewers, 3 minor revisions, 2 major revisions, 1 rejection, and the rejection was given by the editor)
2022.6.15 resubmitted to the journal
2022.6.16 with editor
2022.6.24 under review
2022.7.14 major revision (a total of 2 reviewers, one of them an arbitration reviewer, who provided major revisions, and the other accepted it directly)
2022.7.17 resubmitted to the journal
2022.7.18 with editor
2022.7.21 accepted
I was rejected with only one rejection out of the 6 reviewers, but fortunately, the editor invited me to resubmit, otherwise I would have been truly speechless.

歪歪 2022-07-26

It has been more than 20 days, and it is still a reviewer invitation.

歪歪 2022-07-19

It has been 16 days under review, and there has been no sign of progress at all.

歪歪 2022-07-02

How long after your with editor will it be under review?

未竟 2022-06-27

Recently, is it that everyone's required reviews take a longer time to complete?

未竟 2022-06-27

Top journal in the field of membrane, not bad.

时代鲁迅 2022-06-26

It has been a long time since the required reviewers completed.

时代鲁迅 2022-06-21

How are you doing? So am I; I have been waiting for a reply for 8 days now, the date has changed 4 times, but the status has not changed.

时代鲁迅 2022-06-21

The required reviews changed 4 times in 8 days, I don't know what happened.

时代鲁迅 2022-06-04

11 days still in "with editor" status, not sure how it will turn out, my first article in life, very nervous.