Ahui丶 2022-03-28

What is your current situation?

Never rejected 2022-03-26

Excuse me, is there any feedback on the plagiarism check results for the submitted article?

cauchy 2022-03-23

The requirements are indeed high, there is no chance to submit for review, the editor directly passes it.

cauchy 2022-03-15

Just asking, brothers, how long does it usually take for a journal to be with the editor? I submitted it because they have a fast review process, but now it has been with the editor for almost half a month.

Zhouweiw123 2022-02-25

The editor-in-chief Cao has very high demands.

谁还不是个小白 2022-02-22

I was really disgusted once. I changed the format and handed it to the editor. After a long time, they said it lacked innovation and asked for a revision of the language. After modifying the language, the technical review requested further changes. After completing the changes, it took almost 20 days to return to the editor. In the end, it was rejected. Are you kidding me?

幸运之星月阳 2022-01-29

The same person, even the titles are very similar, the same type of craft, formulas are dissected and reassembled, even basic mechanical theories are violated, the images are very similar, within the past two or three years, six or seven articles were published, it is unclear how the editorial board reviewed them, they are not just fake, some data are not even tested, they are simply copied and pasted onto their own work.

哇咔咔2 2022-01-29

Many people have misunderstandings about JMPT, thinking that it is a materials journal, but in fact, this journal should belong to the field of mechanical manufacturing. Pure material synthesis and material performance are not accepted in this journal. Its main focus is on the phenomena involved in the material processing process and their impact on the processing process. However, the research on material processing process based on processes such as mechanics and thermodynamics is relatively difficult, and fewer and fewer people are involved in it. On the other hand, explaining the material processing process directly from the processed structure mainly relies on experiments and does not require too much theory, so more and more people are involved in it. Many articles on JMPT also focus on this aspect. In traditional fields such as forging and machining, JMPT is already considered a top journal, but in recent years, 3D printing, welding, and other material-related directions have become more popular, resulting in more articles, so JMPT has become more like a materials journal. After the new editor-in-chief took office, the number of articles published in JMPT has been decreasing, with less than 400 articles in 2021. Therefore, if it is a non-3D printing article, publishing in JMPT should be considered a very good article. However, for 3D printing articles, publishing in JMPT can only be considered as second-rate, after all, the position of Acta is unshakable.

哇咔咔2 2022-01-18

2022, IF is expected to be around 5.6. The gap with JMP is narrowing, with JMP expected to be around 5.2.

莹莹吖 2022-01-13

So, may I ask if you have been rejected?

不醒人士 2022-01-10

Is it possibly a formatting error? After submitting, there will be a formatting review, and then you can make changes before submitting again. I'm not sure if this is what you're referring to.

莹莹吖 2022-01-06

Hello, have you resolved it? I have also encountered the same problem.

凌霄lingxiao 2021-12-28

Very good, the editors and reviewers are very responsible.

SFAACEDVG 2021-12-23

After half a month, the decision is in process with the editor. It seems like it will be rejected.

sianmao 2021-11-23

Posted for 3 months, directly rejected in the first review. After two months, it changed to "Decision in process." A week later, it changed again to "under review." Two weeks later, "Decision in process" again. Shortly after, the results came out. All three reviewers gave positive evaluations, with two suggesting acceptance. However, one reviewer suggested further discussion on certain points. Unfortunately, Editor-in-Chief Cao Jian rejected it directly, stating a lack of innovation as the reason. It's really unfair. I had no choice but to revise it according to the reviewers' comments and submit it to another journal.

CQU-博士 2021-10-28

When submitting, all previous steps have been completed. However, there are always errors when selecting the publishing option, and it is unable to proceed to the next step of generating a PDF. Is there anyone who has encountered a similar problem? Asking for help, thank you very much!

七十二变 2021-10-20

It has become Zone 2. There are several very similar articles on it, with the same theoretical model and similar formula disassembly and assembly. Yet, they are used by the same person to analyze and predict various aspects of the same process. Could it be that this model and several groups of formula disassembly and assembly have become universal? They can analyze and predict everything, anything. The bolder a person is, the more capable they are. It is a typical case of fraud.

o南城凉筑o 2021-10-17

Brother, may I ask how many reviewers do you have for the first review?

o南城凉筑o 2021-10-17

Brother, how many reviewers did you assign for the first review?

o南城凉筑o 2021-10-17

Brother, how many reviewers do you have?

七十二变 2021-10-14

Who still watches the minor categories, now it's all about the major categories, not the minor ones.

尤小胖 2021-10-13

Isn't the Chinese Academy of Sciences still in the top 1 district?

Hongzhuang 2021-10-13

It has changed to District 2, what a pity.

QWZ 2021-08-30

Unfortunately, I have encountered the recently frequently heard request to modify the abstract expression and resubmit, only to be rejected due to a discrepancy in scope. The expression style of JMPT is very unique, and making changes would be time-consuming and require significant modifications. I have heard that they adopted this method to increase the rejection rate, but unfortunately, my boss likes this journal. It has delayed me for one cycle, and even if I submit to other journals, I will have to adjust back. Be mentally prepared for this.

lwn 2021-08-14

2020.9.29 submitted to journal
2020.9.30 with editor
2020.10.5 under review
2020.12.1 One reviewer did not respond, changed reviewer
2021.3.27 major revision Two reviewers, each with over a dozen comments, comments were relatively mild, mainly focused on elaborating on certain figures and discussing certain points in more detail
2021.4.22 revised submission
2021.6.7 major revision Two reviewers, one with sharp comments claiming inaccuracies in the original data, the other more mild, suggesting improvements in language
2021.7.3 revised submission
2021.7.22 major revision Two reviewers, comments focused on modifying certain figures and the format of references
2021.7.30 revised submission
2021.8.7 accept
The reviewers were very strict in reviewing the data, and careful responses to their questions were required when submitting the revisions. Don't be afraid of the trouble. Additionally, the journal has strict formatting requirements. The review process took nearly a year, but the editor's responses were quick. The reviewers were somewhat speechless, as they encountered one who accepted the review but did not respond. I wish you all encounter reviewers who reply promptly.

yjjol 2021-07-29

May I ask how long did you receive the results with the editor?

雷 2021-07-26

Hello, your thesis has a high rate of repetition. Did the editor provide you with a plagiarism report?

wangzj007 2021-07-22

Hello, may I ask about the journal's requirement for a cover letter? "In bullet form, clearly state what's new that this manuscript brings." What does this mean? Is it mandatory?

This means that the journal requires you to list, in bullet points, the novel or unique aspects that your manuscript brings. It is likely a mandatory requirement for the cover letter.

磕磕绊绊 2021-07-21

Very impressed. This journal is still very niche. In May, there were 1,300 articles. To put it simply, many articles were resubmitted due to various formatting issues, so one article counts as two. There were also various rejections and resubmissions, all in order to increase the so-called rejection rate. By calculating this, the number of articles submitted in a year and the number accepted can be determined. As long as the reviewers have some negative opinions, they directly reject or reject and resubmit.

SGLJ 2021-07-01

It's such a pity that I was just promoted and then demoted to Zone 2, and it has to be JCR Zone 2.