Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

liudh 2022-10-01

9.30 Decision in Process translates to "9:30 Decision in Process" in English.

liudh 2022-09-30

9.1 Submission
9.11 With Editor
9.13 Under Review
9.15 Under Review
9.30 Required Reviews Completed

火箭小布 2022-09-27

It is estimated that it will be rejected.

熊哥 2022-09-25

sep 23 Decision in Process translates to "September 23 Decision in Process" in English.

熊哥 2022-09-23

September 16 submission
September 22 with editor

goooooodluck 2022-09-13

The text you provided is already in Chinese. In English, it translates to: "Submitted for review (the review process and feedback will take about one month), currently undergoing major revisions."

liudh 2022-09-13

How are you doing, bro?

激光加工鸭先知 2022-09-13

Seeking advice from the experienced ones in the same situation!

激光加工鸭先知 2022-09-13

Same situation, seeking guidance!

frame111 2022-08-24

What is the situation with the latest JCR partition being Q2? Can someone knowledgeable analyze it?

ZQYing 2022-08-18

The first submission was made in January 2021. It went through three major revisions, two minor revisions, and was resubmitted four times. In the last resubmission, two reviewers recommended publication, but the editor requested major revisions. After making the revisions, the editor sent it for review again. Does this mean that the editor does not want this article? Each rejection has instructed me to revise according to the reviewers' comments and resubmit. However, after resubmission, new reviewers are assigned, and this cycle has continued until now.

goooooodluck 2022-08-13

Not yet, the current status has not changed.

尤小胖 2022-08-08

Has the external audit been conducted now?

goooooodluck 2022-08-06

Expecting good results.

AcceptedMaster 2022-07-04

Old-established reputable journal in the manufacturing field. The review process is extremely rigorous, including careful scrutiny of graphic colors, word usage, and compatibility of reference citations. Reviewers may also conduct reverse calculations to verify results. After undergoing two major revisions and one round of resubmission, I am delighted to have received recognition from the editor-in-chief and reviewers.

啤酒小王子 2022-06-07

I would like to ask, what is the final result of your "decision in process"?

Never rejected 2022-05-31

> Submission by the end of March
> Technical review returned, discussing each reference point by point
> Review returned after 2 weeks, minor revisions given a deadline of 10 days, revised manuscript submitted in early May
> Continuing review for another 2 weeks, accepted by the end of May
> The entire submission process took 2 months, which is relatively smooth. In general, 3 months is considered normal.

Ahui丶 2022-05-09

Reject and resubmit, is there a high chance after resubmission?

关内侯 2022-05-07

Many units still use the basic version as the standard, and the upgraded version has not been widely adopted. In fact, they are all similar because most journals, if upgraded, will also be upgraded by you, me, and him. The difference is not significant if not upgraded.

乔木2018 2022-05-04

Encountered a situation that most people encounter.
2022.04.08 Submitted, received feedback to modify the citation format (already mostly compliant, still needs modifications).
2022.04.13 Resubmitted after modifications.
2022.05.03 After 20 days without review, received feedback rejecting the submission, stating it didn't meet one of their basic requirements, and that was it...
I believe this has increased the rejection rate.

never reject 2022-05-01

May I ask which district JMPT is in now? The query returned two results.

fsagsg 2022-04-26

Translate the following text into English: With the editor, it will directly become "decision in process" after three days. Is there still a little hope? How long will the "decision in process" last?

fsagsg 2022-04-26

Friend, may I ask if there is any news? My situation is the same as yours.

Zhouweiw123 2022-04-26

2021.12.30 Submission
2022.01.29 Reject and resubmit (One reviewer rejected, reasons for rejection were weak, editor gave opportunity for resubmission)
2022.02.24 Revised and resubmitted (Delayed for a while due to the recent holidays)
2022.03.31 Accepted directly
Originally felt hopeless after rejection, but still quite lucky. Thanks to Editor J. Cao for being very efficient.

Never rejected 2022-04-22

On the page for submitting manuscripts, select the corresponding project to upload.

Yin 2022-04-22

May I ask how you selected the option to upload the additional file 'Responses to Technical Check Results' when you were modifying the format? Because there is no option for 'Response to Technical Check Results' in the project.

青团 2022-04-17

This means "changing sides". Why are you flustered? It simply means it's already over.

meng li 2022-04-15

I would like to ask everyone for advice. My submission was rejected, so I submitted to another journal. Today, when I logged into the system of this journal, I wanted to record the process time, but I found out that it has been transferred. Now I am very anxious...

harry_991 2022-04-12

2022.01.20 Submission
2022.02.15 Major revision
2022.03.14 Minor revision (Delayed due to the New Year)
2022.04.06 Accepted
The reviewer took a long time, and the editor had to urge before receiving feedback. Normally, the feedback for revisions should not exceed one week.
The initial review by the editor was strict, and the review period after submission was very short. Thank you to E. Budak for editing and J. Cao for being the editor-in-chief. They were very efficient.

zouzhixiang 2022-04-06

During my time as a graduate student, another paper in the field of manufacturing was rejected twice by this journal. Let me share the process of submitting this time.

Submitted on December 26, 2021.
Under review on December 30, 2021.
Updated under review on January 19, 2022.
Updated under review on February 19, 2022.
Required completed review on March 15, 2022.
Decision in process on March 18, 2022.
Minor revision on March 20, 2022.
Response revision on March 29, 2022.
With editor on March 30, 2022.
Decision in process on April 4, 2022.
Accepted on April 6, 2022.

It was a long journey during this period, and I wish everyone success in their endeavors. Let's keep up the good work! Haha.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started