Verified Reviews - Journal of Hydrology
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

liuchuanxiu 2022-05-19

May I ask how long you usually invite reviewers? It has been a week since my review was invited. What could be the reason for such a long invitation process?

大水怪1 2022-05-17

Excuse me, may I ask if this journal supports dual corresponding authors?

ypxh 2022-05-17

May I ask if the change from "under review" to "reviewer invited" is due to the diverse opinions of the experts who were previously reviewing the submission? Or is there another reason? Thank you.

hsk0059 2022-05-14

I have come to fulfill my vow. JH's current volume of manuscripts is much larger than before, and the level of publication is uneven. If the writing skills are there, there is still a great opportunity. The record process is as follows:
10.22 submit to the journal;
11.05 Editor assign;
11.06 Reviewer(s) invited;
11.07 Under Review;
11.22 Reviewer(s) invited;
12.02 Under Review;
3.09 with editor;
3.14 Decision in process;
3.17 Major revision;
4.2 With Editor;
4.5 Editor Assigned;
4.6 Under review;
5.11 Decision in process;
5.11 accepted.
(In my opinion, if the status changes from "Under Review" to "Reviewer(s) invited;", the probability of it not being tragic is 70%, of course, this is only for reference. I wish everyone success.)

大水怪1 2022-05-14

May I ask how long did you have to wait for the reviewer invited afterwards?

zhangj 2022-05-10

After the rest, it was submitted for review and given to the recipient.

Rzui 2022-05-08

Excuse me, do you have any results now? I have also been invited for review for nearly two months, and the latest date change was still in early April...

遥感人 2022-05-06

The self-quotation rate is almost 15%, and the estimated posting volume is probably 50% of the Chinese population.

遥感人 2022-05-06

How did the number of articles published in this journal become so large in recent years? Hydrological science is originally a niche discipline, so how can there be so many top articles? I have also noticed that there are already many people around me who are involved in hydrology. It is no longer as prestigious as before. It seems to be changing rapidly.

Syda Zha 2022-05-04

It's considered normal speed for JOH~

Syda Zha 2022-05-03

20220217 submit
20220328 under Review (There have been several changes between "under review" and "invite reviewers," indicating that some reviewers may have declined to review)
20220502 decision in process
20220503 moderate revision
20220517 submit
20220607 minor revision
20220608 submit
20220611 accepted

小池塘 2022-04-15

Excuse me, after Xiao Xiu returns, does the editor directly accept it without further review?

小池塘 2022-04-15

Excuse me, did Zhongxiu resubmit for review after returning? Or did the editor decide to accept it directly?

zhangj 2022-04-05

JH's first article was initially submitted to Geoderma for review, but it was rejected and provided with many suggestions. It was resubmitted on December 12th and received a revision notice on January 20th, with minor and moderate revisions requested. The revised article was returned within one month. It was accepted in March, and the review process was quite fast.

yl14621 2022-03-28

I boldly guess that Geo-oeG, this research friend, must have had their submission to this publication rejected. There is no need to post multiple comments criticizing it. To succeed, one must work on their own skills. It is possible that some articles have been included for publication that shouldn't have been, but we should not make extreme judgments. Keep up the good work!

sungm 2022-03-28

It's not easy to write the first SCI paper during the master's degree. The response was very quick, but the back-and-forth revisions took a long time.
August 21, 2021 - Submitted
September 26, 2021 - Rejected but advised to resubmit after making revisions
November 14, 2021 - Resubmitted
December 20, 2021 - Major revisions
January 8, 2022 - Revised
February 18, 2022 - Minor revisions
March 7, 2022 - Revised
March 22, 2022 - Accepted
March 25, 2022 - Proofreading

木子雨 2022-03-28

I also returned after a major repair, it has been over a week now, and it is still under review. My heart feels so uncertain.

DYZ_0.0 2022-03-25

The first article JH, considered lucky. Thanks to editor Huaming Guo and associate editor ChongYu Xu. Submitted on August 11, 2021; major revision on December 3, 2021. Received in revised form on December 21, 2021; accepted on January 9, 2022. Hope to have my future work accepted by this journal!

Blu-blue 2022-03-25

It is possible that the reviewer did not accept the manuscript and a new reviewer was invited again.

木子雨 2022-03-23

2022.01.11 Submission
2022.02.15 Major revision
2022.03.14 Modifications completed, returning
2022.03.21 Under review

Ge5ge 2022-03-21

Have you got any results? It has been one month since the invitation for reviewers.

Blu-blue 2022-03-19

My under review has been over half a year already, and they even added another reviewer in the middle. In the end, the feedback given was fairly critical, it's just too dragged out.

Blu-blue 2022-03-19

Submitted nearly nine months ago, received first review comments in about eight months. Made revisions and resubmitted, but it has been 15 days and the status is still "editor assigned". It's really too slow!

x-x-x 2022-03-13

10.02 submit; 03.07 accept

Overall, the process went quite smoothly and the review was also fast. However, the status of "editor assigned" lasted for too long, starting at around 20 days. This may be due to the internal work allocation of the editors, which resulted in such a long duration for this step. This journal is well-established in the field of hydrology and water resources, and it has a high level of recognition.

阿拉丁哈哈 2022-03-13

2021-08-29 Submit
2021-08-31 Under Review
2021-09-08 Under Review

As of 2022-3-13, it has been under review for over six months.

Is this journal slow without prior notice?
After being under review for so long, will they provide an opportunity for revisions?
Does anyone know the final acceptance rate of this journal after the "Under Review" stage?

sdct 2022-03-11

As of 2022/3/11

sdct 2022-03-11

2022/2/18 submit
2022/2/20 Editor Assigned
2022/2/27 Editor Assigned
As of 2022/2/11, it is still Editor Assigned. What is the situation? Are they still assigning editors?

dbzn 2022-03-04

I am also like this now. I submitted on 12.13 and now I am still inviting reviewers. I don't know what to do.

lilyli 2022-03-02

Hello teacher, have you found the submission template for this journal? I couldn't find it in the journal guidelines, sorry for bothering you. Thank you.

F0rest 2022-01-16

The current status is still "Reviewer invited". We have been searching for the third reviewer for a month but have not found one yet.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started