linregin 2023-03-11

"2.16 under review, on March 11th, it changed directly from under review to decision in process. Doesn't this feel unpleasant?"

加倍热爱 2023-03-11

If you can change, then there is hope!

ysy001 2023-03-10

I have been 15 days already.

毕业要紧啊 2023-03-10

It has been ten days already. Save the child.

灌水老先生 2023-03-08

I submitted it in September last year, then it was in the hands of the editor for a month. After another 3 months, it was reviewed, rejected, and encouraged to resubmit. At that time, I felt that the process was too slow. In February of this year, I made revisions and submitted it again, and it has been with the editor for 18 days now. Could it be that it will take another full month for the review? Why is it so slow? How come the articles published in journals recently are so fast? They are published within a month? What is going on?

huangkan 2023-03-07

RRC has DIPed, and I knew it might be rejected or transferred. Today, I received a transfer email as expected. One rejection and one major revision. To the reviewer who rejected it, could you please carefully read the article and show some responsibility? The questions raised were not only abstract but also very frustrating. There were a total of four questions, none of which addressed how to improve the quality of the article. They were all irrelevant and abstract. I will appeal.

Doctor.T 2023-03-07

2023.3.6 decision in process translates to "Decision in process on March 6, 2023."

linregin 2023-03-07

How can I see such a detailed state?

Doctor.T 2023-03-06

2023.3.5 refers to the date March 5, 2023. "The third review completed" means that the third evaluation or assessment has been finished.

Doctor.T 2023-03-06

2023.2.25 the second review completed.

zzy 2023-03-03

It has been 7 days with eidtor, I don't know when it will finally make progress, and I'm getting impatient waiting.

三乐斋主人 2023-03-02

I have to say, sometimes submitting a post has a lot to do with luck.

Doctor.T 2023-03-02

rrc status has been 6 days

hkjbldk 2023-02-28

In general, apart from est and wr, this is probably it. If even this is considered mediocre, then stoten, ep, jclp, jem, and so on are all even more mediocre? Moreover, it was said before that Tsinghua University does not publish, so are all the publications from Tsinghua University est and wr?

灵雨星言 2023-02-27

I looked through the comments section, and there are so many idle people saying that JHM is a low-quality journal. Whether it is or isn't, everyone knows in their hearts. Why bother searching for a sense of existence in the comments section? When you criticize, could you please provide the great works you have already published? Let's see how many articles you have published in CNS. Let us read them. Or just call the Chinese Academy of Sciences directly and have it listed as a warning journal. Can we please stop seeking confidence by denigrating others here?

huangkan 2023-02-27

The comments from the second reviewer have come back, and there are still two reviewers who have not finished. I don't know why the status has changed to RRC, but anyway, I pray for a major revision.

小萌妮 2023-02-26

After submission, the manuscript remained in the hands of the editor for half a month before being sent for review. The review comments were received in 20 days, with two reviewers providing major and minor revisions.

昊晨 2023-02-26

12.29 Post
01.03 Review
01.24 Major revision
01.31 Revise
02.24 Accept

Very lucky, my 4th paper in JHM, my first paper after starting work, thanks to Professor Jörg Rinklebe, thanks to my boss, thanks to the reviewers!

科研dddddog 2023-02-25

2023.2.8 submitted to the journal
2023.2.8 with editor
2023.2.25 still with editor
........... editor, what's going on with you?

奈奈笠 2023-02-25

There is still another paragraph after the "sincerely" signature in the return email. At that time, I thought it was rejected, but then I remembered that the first paragraph of the email mentioned major revisions. Have any of you encountered this situation?

Comments from Editors and Reviewers:
In its current state, the overall English proficiency of your manuscript does not meet the journal's requirements. You may consider asking a native speaker to check the grammar, style, and language of your manuscript, or utilize the professional language editing options provided by Elsevier Author Services: https://webshop.elsevier.com/
Although the problems being addressed are potentially of interest to our readership, your manuscript does not meet the required quality standards to be considered for publication.

奈奈笠 2023-02-25

投稿经验 - Submission Experience

2023.2.7 submitted to the journal
2023.2.10 under review
2023.2.21 Required reviews completed
2023.2.24 major revision

(1) Friends, let me tell you, the speed is faster than I imagined. It's important to understand the editor of this journal.
(2) The editor sent five reviewers, one had no comments (probably didn't respond on time?), two suggested major revisions (and mentioned that the level of innovation was not significant and there were some issues that seemed amateurish), one suggested minor revisions (expressed appreciation, said it was interesting, and gave suggestions that were not very critical), and one rejected the submission (with broad reasons such as lack of innovation and sensitivity).
(3) However, in the end, the editor requested major revisions and gave me 35 days to make the modifications and resubmit.

Oh, friends, I hope it's helpful.

Doctor.T 2023-02-25

2023.2.24 - Required Reviews Completed

阿科阿科 2023-02-25

Thank you to the editor Guillaume Echevarria for their diligent work! It took a long time, but the good outcome is satisfying!

Doctor.T 2023-02-24

2023.2.24 the first review completed → The first review was completed on February 24th, 2023.

Doctor.T 2023-02-24

2023.2.11 all review invitations accepted

This means that on February 11, 2023, all review invitations were accepted.

lim 2023-02-24

Why have I been working for 9 days and still in the editor?

生态站门口 2023-02-22

Why am I still "with editor" even though I submitted it 20 days earlier than you? What is this speed related to?

huangkan 2023-02-21

2023.02.09 Submitted
2023.02.10 with editor
2023.02.12 Under Review
2023.02.13 the first Review invitations accepted
2023.02.14 the second Review invitations accepted
2023.02.17 the third Review invitations accepted
2023.02.18 the fourth Review invitations accepted
2023.02.20 the first Review completed

huangkan 2023-02-21

How many reviewers are there, please?

wjjokk 2023-02-20

Posted on November 15, 2022,
Received review comments in early December 2022 and underwent major revisions.
Returned comments on January 13, 2023.
Received review comments for the second round on January 31, 2023. Although it required major revisions, there were only 5 issues.
Returned comments on February 17, 2023.
Accepted on February 19, 2023.
It's a bit lucky, even though a few of the questions were challenging, I tried my best to respond.