Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

SCIs accepted 2021-10-27

Hello, may I ask if your editor is German?

顺子 2021-10-23

If you encounter such a situation, you can appeal to the editor-in-chief.

kust 2021-10-20

2021.9.5 Submission
2021.9.6 Under review
2021.9.27 Major revision, 1 reviewer
2021.10.16 Revision requested
2021.10.20 Accepted
From submission to acceptance, it took one and a half months.
Submitting is also a matter of luck, as there was only one reviewer. It's the first time encountering this.

Howhow 2021-10-20

It has been 10 days with the editor, and the current status is still under review for over a month. The JHM review process is really slow.

搬砖工人 2021-10-18

Now JHM is really slow, it seems that I have to be cautious when submitting in the future.

阿律 2021-10-18

2021.07.28 submitted
2021.07.28 with editor
2021.07.29 under review
2021.08.14 major revision (12 reviewers, the first time encountering so many)
2021.09.23 revision submitted
2021.09.23 with editor
2021.10.06 minor revision (one reviewer insisted that we cite his own 9 articles, responded to each point)
2021.10.13 revision submitted
2021.10.15 with editor
2021.10.16 accepted
Thanks to editor Lingxin Chen and the timely processing and review by the reviewers. Looking forward to the continuous improvement of JHM!

yang@ 2021-10-17

It has been six days, still lacking an article to find a job after graduation.

zf519 2021-10-15

I submitted my article on September 3rd, and it was not under review until September 24th. During this period, I always thought it would not be reviewed. Yesterday morning, I received major revisions comments.

yang@ 2021-10-15

It has been 4 days with Editor. I feel that the speed of JHM has really slowed down in the second half of this year. Before, it was often reviewed and submitted on the same day.

末班车 2021-10-11

The first time I encountered fifteen reviewers, two of them rejected my submission while the others requested revisions. However, due to the editor's own mistake, they forgot to copy one reviewer's comments for me. Nevertheless, when I resubmitted for a second review, it was sent to that same reviewer again. In the end, I didn't have time to respond and my submission was rejected, which is quite frustrating. Editor Chen.

Maxium 2021-09-30

4.10 Submission
5.11 Rejected, successful appeal, modification
6.6 Resubmission
9.29 Accepted
Encountered a very meticulous reviewer in the industry, who raised a total of 22 questions in two rounds of review. Fortunately, it was accepted.

kust 2021-09-28

Reviewing takes 21 days, and there is only one reviewer. It's really strange, how come there is only one reviewer? Is there anyone else facing the same situation?

water excel 2021-09-26

Please comment below if the people from Haizhou are all slow. It has been three months and they still haven't come back to review.

jkjiayin 2021-09-24

Posted on June 22, 2021, the time for under review has changed three times, and so far there has been no response to the first review comments, causing anxiety.

那又怎样 2021-09-21

This Haizhou is really bad. They don't even review papers transferred from CEJ. CEJ at least reviewed and rejected the second review, but they directly said it doesn't meet the journal's requirements. I hope I don't encounter him next time. The journal, which originally had no issues, has now been downgraded to the second tier because of this. Now, I have submitted to Chemosphere, and I don't know the result yet.

zf519 2021-09-17

Is your editor the one from Germany?

SPM843 2021-09-16

Thank you, Shaily Mahendra, for editing!

kust 2021-09-16

Posted on September 5th, reviewed on September 6th. The under review time has changed 3 times. I don't know what's going on.

多多益善~ 2021-09-12

After submission to the journal, on the same day it was with the editor. And it has been 17 days with the editor. What is the situation? Should I follow up on it?

tzyooo 2021-09-09

Zaher Hashisho, my submission took a long time.

B-Snow 2021-09-07

Submitted on June 3rd
Major revision on July 6th (four reviewers, first three major revisions, last one minor revision)
Returned on August 3rd
On August 19th, one of the reviewers mentioned some minor grammar issues, the rest were accepted directly, and the editor made a small modification to the grammar.
Returned on August 29th
Accepted directly on September 3rd.
I really appreciate the professionalism of the reviewers and the editor Teresa A.P. Rocha-Santos. The handling speed of the manuscript was really fast and professional!

USTC刷瓶匠 2021-09-06

Hello, may I ask which editor is in charge of your submission? It has been nine days since I submitted it with the editor.

USTC刷瓶匠 2021-09-06

Hello, may I ask which editor is responsible for your article? Mine has been with the editor for nine days already.

SPM843 2021-09-03

May I ask how long your first trial is?

晓涛涛 2021-09-02

In the past two years, the impact factor of environmental journals has been rising rapidly, and the review process is also fast. The impact factor of JHM has already exceeded 10, which is definitely commendable. Although its reputation is not as good as EST and WR at the moment, the journal is growing rapidly, and we hope it continues to improve.

chief chen 2021-09-01

Supplement:
Received on August 16, 2021, available online on August 28, 2021, officially published on September 1, 2021.
Very efficient.
Article link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126947, "When nanoparticle and microbes meet: The effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on microbial community and nutrient cycling in hyperaccumulator system".
Welcome criticism, corrections, and citations from experts.

发文章 2021-09-01

Don't want money, it's not open source.

南宫灭 2021-08-31

Go back upstairs, forget it. Who would go to work at est, wr, acb, cej, etc. and bother to apply for jhm? As for Haizhou's editing skills, his publication level on ResearchGate is nothing special. I wish him frequent rejections after encountering major situations in his future submissions, and I hope his title remains at associate professor indefinitely.

安然 2021-08-30

I am also this editor, Haizhou Liu. It has been half a year, and I have been following up and asking for the submission. Finally, they rejected it.

USTC刷瓶匠 2021-08-29

Hello, may I ask which editor is responsible for your article?

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search