雨石 2023-05-08

The paper has been accepted. Thank you for the editor's timely handling. It took 3 months from submission to acceptance, which is quite fast. I wish the journal continued success.

beckyzhao 2023-05-07

May I ask, what comes after "decision in process"? Has it been submitted for review?

雨石 2023-05-07

Second review for revision, looking forward to the editor's approval.

橡树法庭的赶due人 2023-05-06

Does this journal require a submission fee?

土水土 2023-04-27

The submission to acceptance process took a total of two months. The initial submission was received by the editor one week later, and then it took another week for the review. I didn't receive the link (which was kind of strange). Two weeks later, I received the reviewer's comments, which required minor revisions. It took a little over two weeks to make the revisions and resubmit, and then I received the acceptance letter in just over a week. Overall, the initial processing of this journal was a bit slow, but the later stages were quite fast. As for the reviewers of this journal, they gave 14 days for the first review and 7 days for the second review. As for the quality of the journal, it is expected to improve this year and overall it is at the level of mainstream environmental journals. Since becoming a first-tier journal, the number of submissions has indeed increased significantly.

布利啾啾迪不利多 2023-04-26

I have been with my editor for a month.

pku_e 2023-04-26

How can we know which editor is responsible for the article?

undefined 2023-04-24

Recorded on 4.24.2023
Submitted to Journal
On 4.25.2023, it is with the Editor
Under review since 5.04.2023

kyxcn 2023-04-24

Does changing "reviews required completed" to "decision in process" mean rejection?

t2021 2023-04-23

2023.4.07 Submitted to Journal
2023.4.23 In the hands of the editor after 16 days - so slow!

dream it possible 2023-04-21

It has been a month with the editor, but nothing has changed. The progress is too slow. Is it the same for everyone? This journal is really torturous. I can't wait any longer. I'm anxious to graduate.

小刘小刘拯救地球 2023-04-21

03-27-2023 submitted
03-30-2023 With Editor
Still With Editor for 20 days

Another submission made in February rejected within 3 days.

jjjkkk 2023-04-20

I really don't understand the work efficiency of the editor-in-chief, Raf Dewil. Perhaps my article is not appealing enough, but I really just hope to receive the results faster. The time with the editor is also too long.

雨石 2023-04-16

You are really fast at editing.

雨石 2023-04-16

The editor responded very quickly and has already completed the second review. Looking forward to a good result!!!

雨石 2023-04-14

I really envy you, basking in good fortune. I hope mine can also be received directly!!!

小小轩 2023-04-14

You can follow Elsevier's official account, and let the customer service assist you with inquiries.

messyy 2023-04-14

May I ask how the original poster saw that they were rejected by several reviewers? On my end, I only see that the Last review activity has been updated several times, but the Review invitations accepted is still 0. Sigh... It's been almost 3 months.

雨石 2023-04-11

Submit Half a month
With editor Half a month
Under Review 20 days
Revision 17 days
Currently in the revision state, the speed is still acceptable, looking forward to the editor's response!!!

二师兄想吃唐僧 2023-04-10

4.6 Finally, under review, too difficult.

雨落凡尘 2023-04-09

2023.01.20 submitted to journal
2023.01.27 with editor+under review - It only took four hours in between.
2023.03.07 under review - They kept inviting reviewers and finally found two reviewers.
2023.03.19 revision - The editor continued to invite reviewers and may have wanted to find a third one, but since they couldn't, they made a decision.
2023.03.30 revised with editor
2023.04.01 under review
2023.04.09 required reviews completed+accept
The number of submissions to JEM has indeed increased this year, but the handling speed of the editor I encountered was extremely fast.

小小轩 2023-04-09

I now have 51 reviewers, and I can't figure out why no reviewers are willing to review articles on ecosystem services.

小小的先生 2023-04-08

What is the current status of the manuscript review for the original poster?

shunlibiye66 2023-04-07

It has been one month since the second trial.

chongdong 2023-04-06

It has been over three months since the second trial...

梧萌蒂蕴 2023-04-06

The translation of the text is as follows: "Very fast speed! Thank you, editor!
12.23 submit
1.24 major
2.09 repair
3.16 accept
3.28 online"

zyuoo001 2023-04-06

You have 16 reviewers, and I have more than ten reviewers rejecting my paper... How did your article end up?

毛早早 2023-04-06

Can the article be retrieved online on the web of science?

毛早早 2023-04-06

May I ask how long it usually takes to publish after being hired?

kelsey_zy 2023-04-04

The text translates to: "After one month under review, it was rejected. It was too slow, too slow. Two major revisions were done, and one rejection. The editor directly rejected it. For everyone's reference."