zixirongrong 2023-07-11

Today is still sub, I heard that this journal is extremely slow, can it be true?

冰糖412 2023-07-11

After the RRC, immediately DIP, and three days later, a revised SUBSTANTIALLY was given.

长吁咚咚锵 2023-07-09

I am also a DIP on the 4th, have you received any news about yours?

zixirongrong 2023-07-08

June 28 sub
It's still sub now
I don't know how long it will take to be with the editor, ah?

hhhhhaa 2023-07-08

I would like to ask, the opinions from the second review have all come back, and the "Decision in Process" status has been ongoing since July 5th...

HNING 2023-07-07

Submission: 06-01-2023
With Editor: 07-02-2023
Today: 07-07-2023

Zinnia 2023-07-07

The first submission was made at the end of March, and there were two revisions in between. It was accepted at the end of June and went online in early July. The first submission was made to JEM, and overall, the feeling is pretty good!

sssssnz 2023-07-07

07.04 Required Reviews Completed (Received two opinions)
07.05 Required Reviews Completed (Received one opinion)
The editor sent an email saying that they will make a decision based on the opinions, so we need to patiently wait and hope for a major revision. Let's not get rejected...
Once we submit, that's it. Not everyone can be certain.

哈哈哈1992 2023-07-07

This usually means rejection.

SunJianFeng 2023-07-06

May I ask if all the authors need to confirm the email before it can be sent to the editor after submission?

二师兄想吃唐僧 2023-07-06

Returned for repair feedback on June 7th, received acceptance email on June 29th. Overall, the speed is relatively fast. Just making a note of it and also wishing everyone good luck.

臭臭 2023-07-05

Hello, may I ask how long does the "decision in process" process usually take?

南宫灭 2023-07-04

Posted on 14th May 2023, revised on 14th June 2023, both reviewers requested minor revisions, revised again on 2nd July 2023, accepted on 3rd July 2023. Paolo Roccaro, the editor, was very efficient. Overall, it was a good experience.

houhou2121 2023-07-04

Article in the field of environmental economics and management:
1.30 submitted + with
2.2 under review
4.12 substantially revised (one reviewer provided minor revisions, while another gave 6 suggestions for a major revision which was done professionally; the editor finally provided 2 months for the major revision, during which the theoretical model was almost completely rewritten and the empirical adjustments were made slightly)
6.8 reminded to revise + under review
7.3 Required Reviews Completed + accepted
The initial process was slow, but the later stages were really fast!

02A048 2023-07-04

2023.5.8 Submission, under review in a couple of days
2023.6.5 First revision, not specified whether it is minor or major, but provided 21 comments, all of which were constructive and helpful for the paper
2023.6.21 Resubmission
2023.7.1 Acceptance
This journal's editorial process is very fast, and it is said that there are time limits for reviewers. The first review should be returned within 14 days, and the second review within 7 days.
Overall, it is good, and I hope the journal continues to improve.

24March 2023-07-04

Yes, thank you for sharing. I submitted on 6.22 and it changed to "with editor" a week later, and it hasn't changed since then.

墨斗鱼 2023-07-04

7-3 Submit to 4 reviewers.
7-4 2 reviewers accept the review.

sssssnz 2023-07-03

6.19 Under Review (sent to nine reviewers, two agreed to review)
6.30 Under Review (sent to seven more reviewers, one agreed to review) (To see how many reviewers you can see, open "Track your submission," press F12, follow the steps on Little Red Book)

24March 2023-07-03

Has the original poster reminded about the manuscript?

墨斗鱼 2023-07-01

7-1 submitted: Submitted on July 1st
7-1 with editor: Under review by editor on July 1st
7-1 under review 2+: Under review since July 1st, for more than 2 days
Very efficient! Looking forward

Yang Bojin 2023-07-01

May I ask how your progress is going?

youran123 2023-07-01

Wrong reply, replied to the 312th floor, didn't expect to click the wrong one.

youran123 2023-07-01

This situation is likely to be rejected, so you can consider the next journal.

paper machine 2023-06-30

May I ask if the word limit of 8000 words mentioned by this journal includes the references?

24March 2023-06-30

How long did it take for the original poster to go from "with editor" to "under review"?

kiranedved 2023-06-29

The first review probably takes about three months, with two reviewers.
The number of JEMA reviewers has always been very random... I have seen 3, 4, 7+ of them, but this is the first time there are only two.
One reviewer gave a few insignificant comments; the other gave some mild, friendly, sincere, and optimistic suggestions, and then requested rejection... I **********
The editor gave a major revision, so revise it well~

冲冲冲1231978 2023-06-28

JEMA's "consider accept after revision" simply means that the other journals have minor revisions, which will be reviewed again and is quite normal.

归惘 2023-06-27

The email initially stated "consider accept after revision," but the response was "under review" followed by an "invite reviewer." What does this mean?

ssjay 2023-06-23

My 4 and a half months were rejected!

ssjay 2023-06-23

Let me analyze my experience. I applied on September 13, 2022, and on January 27, 2023, after a duration of over 4 and a half months, I received a rejection notification. This speed is really... everyone can judge for themselves.