Verified Reviews - Journal of Environmental Management
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

sometime naive 2021-11-15

This name is clearly Liu Bo.

扎布多德勒 2021-11-15

11.15 was rejected, the reason being unsuitable.

穆郎 2021-11-13

A review article, submitted on September 9th, sent for review on September 22nd, underwent major revisions on October 3rd, returned on October 10th, underwent minor revisions on October 26th, returned on October 27th, and was accepted on October 31st. Thank you JEM (Journal of Engineering Mechanics), and best wishes to everyone for smooth progress, hard work, lucky encounters, and successful accomplishments!

言上 2021-11-12

Yesterday, the result was finally given. It is not suitable, rejected.

SmartL 2021-11-12

Who did you see as the editor over there?

扎布多德勒 2021-11-12

Yes, the editor is Janardan Mainali.

Q2以上是常态 2021-11-12

I submitted on November 18th, and it has been almost a month with the editor. The status has not changed, so I can only patiently wait.

jjjkkk 2021-11-11

You're doing alright, at least better than my "decision in process". Both mine and your edits have been the same until now.

jiamaolee 2021-11-11

11.5 Submission, 11.6 With Editor, the status remains the same until now, with a high likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. The handling editor is Dr. Janardan Mainali, is he also your editor?

扎布多德勒 2021-11-11

2021.11.01 submitted to journal
2021.11.02 with editor
And the status has remained unchanged until today. It seems that many of the comments with "with editor" have been there for a long time, probably indicating that the manuscript might be rejected if reminded. Let's wait a few more days and keep updating.

jjjkkk 2021-11-11

Can you remind them, but I'm not sure about the outcome.

言上 2021-11-11

I am hesitating whether to remind or not, it's not good to just keep waiting.

jjjkkk 2021-11-09

After a few minutes in the hands of the editor, it directly became "Decision in Process", and it took more than twenty days.

bbhxf 2021-11-09

There is no numbering yet now.

bbhxf 2021-11-09

How about yours? I have already submitted mine for over half a month, but still haven't received any news.

zf519 2021-11-09

The quality of some articles in this journal is acceptable, but be cautious about submitting. The editorial department is very untrustworthy. The deputy editor's efficiency in handling manuscripts is extremely low, and they often add new reviewers for revisions. Each manuscript goes through seven or eight reviewers, and many have been rejected for almost half a year. The submission cycle is too long, so it is not recommended for those who are rushing to graduate.

阿hao1 2021-11-09

The first round of review took one month and now it has been one week since the "required reviews completed" status. I asked the customer service of Elsevier and received three review comments: one major revision, one minor revision, and one rejection. The editor may be looking for another reviewer to make a decision, and I am feeling anxious. I wonder if there is any hope in this situation.

HzhRS 2021-11-08

Publication date: 2021-11-06

blanket 2021-11-05

May I ask which district this journal belongs to? Is there any layout fee?

jjjkkk 2021-11-04

Same, I am too.

言上 2021-11-04

I am still in the decision-making process, nothing has changed, it has been half a month.

小小小怪 2021-10-29

6.26 was rejected, with three reviewers, one rejecting and two requesting revisions.

Q2以上是常态 2021-10-29

May I ask how long the experience with the editor and external review lasted?

jjjkkk 2021-10-29

Is there still a chance to submit this for review?

Singing Softly 2021-10-28

7/22/2021 submitted
07/24/2021 with editor
07/30/2021 under review
08/22/2021 required review completed
08/31/2021 under reviewer
10/18/2021 rejection
Restarted midway through the review process, adding an extra two months. The final result was three reviewers: one agreed to accept with major revisions, one disagreed with acceptance, and one was neutral leaning towards disagreement. Ultimately, it was rejected. It was quite slow...

柚子123 2021-10-28

Mine was also submitted to the journal. May I ask how you resolved it?

阿hao1 2021-10-25

10.13 Submission
10.15 with editor
10.18 under review
10.20 under review
...............
Good luck
By the way, are these two reviewers?

jjjkkk 2021-10-25

No, look forward to him sending the letter earlier and then giving some detailed opinions.

chaq163 2021-10-25

It has been nearly 50 days for me, I have reminded twice, and still with the editor. I hope he will reject it soon.

Lindayabi 2021-10-25

How should I put it, it's really unbelievable. It took a month and a half to submit, and it took two weeks to reach the editor. It stayed with the editor for five weeks, and when I sent a reminder letter, it was directly rejected, stating that it didn't meet the requirements. It's really frustrating. The editor is Raf Dewil, PhD, and they rejected the reminder so quickly!

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now