Verified Reviews - Journal of Environmental Management
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

qianqian6 2022-07-08

July 4th Submitted to Journal
Still unchanged until now
Hope to have the editor assigned quickly and processed as soon as possible.

wxs 2022-07-06

w
7.8 revise and resubmit
7.12 under review
7.15 accepted for publication
7.25 proofreading
7.28 final version submitted
8.5 published online

Beachpark 2022-07-06

The text has already been translated into English. It states that the document was received on July 13, 2021, revised on October 17, 2021, and accepted on November 21, 2021.

Chuanzhe Sun 2022-07-04

2022.4.8 submit
2022.4.16 under review
2022.6.4 accept after revised
2022.6.21 resubmit
2022.6.29 required revised completed
2022.7.3 accept
Overall, it is acceptable. Originally, the article was submitted to EP and the reviewer was a Chinese editor from Australia. They were able to handle it within a week. However, there may have been some issues in finding a reviewer for the first review, causing it to take longer. The second review was completed within three days, very quickly. The editor accepted it on Monday when they started working. The speed is a bit slower compared to EP and the overall environment, but the journal's quality is good.

铁铜共催化 2022-07-02

May I ask how to check which editor handled it?

我来灌灌水 2022-06-28

The text "0627 transfer pending" is already in English and does not require translation.

Prindar 2022-06-27

6.17: Accept after revision
6.19: Resubmit, with editor
6.20: Accept
Already accepted, good luck to everyone.

我来灌灌水 2022-06-27

0625 submit
0625 with editor

铁铜共催化 2022-06-23

2022.06.23 avec éditeur translates to "2022.06.23 with editor" in English.

铁铜共催化 2022-06-22

Just invested, advanced oxidation, making a note.

全鑫 2022-06-16

0321 submit
0402 with editor and assign manuscript number
0418 0520 0608 under review
0614 decision in process
The editing speed is higher than expected.

全鑫 2022-06-15

My application has reached the editing process with 2 items, currently in decision in process, waiting for review.

Prindar 2022-06-14

Just asking weakly, who among you received the decision "Accept after revision" after the first review, and then submitted it for revision again, but it has been "Under Review" for over a month now? I'm getting anxious. Among the three reviewers in the first review, the first two had no significant comments and one of them even praised the article. The third reviewer only pointed out some minor issues regarding formatting and wording. The specific timeline is as follows:
2.09 Submitted to the journal
2.10 With editor
2.21 Under review
4.08 Under review
4.20 Required Reviews Completed
4.27 Accepted after revision
5.07 Resubmitted, with editor
5.12 Under review
5.28 Under review

aj lee 2022-06-14

May I ask, is there a high possibility of direct rejection after submission for review?

aj lee 2022-06-14

How many reviewers are there for this?

deeded 2022-06-10

It should be randomly assigned.

Kecerb 2022-06-09

The following text translates to: "gg, no review, directly DIP."

hhhhhaa 2022-06-09

6.8 with editor

od 2022-06-09

5.21 After reading everyone's comments, I wrote a reminder letter and prepared myself to be rejected.
5.29 Under review.
5.29-6.9 The status has been stuck on 5.29, indicating that it has been sent for external review, but it is still unclear how long it will take to get the results.

Samll fly 2022-06-09

It has been over a month and still editing there, will it become outdated? Did you submit it for review?

FFFFirst 2022-06-08

Hello, may I ask if we don't need to select our own editor when submitting the manuscript, and the journal will randomly assign one for us?

FFFFirst 2022-06-08

Hello, may I ask if we don't need to choose our own editor when submitting the manuscript, and the journal will assign one for us?

FFFFirst 2022-06-08

Hello, may I ask if we don't need to choose our own editor when submitting the article? Will the journal randomly assign one for us?

hhhhhaa 2022-06-07

Take note, update if there are any changes.
6.7 submitted to the journal.

njdyj 2022-06-07

6.5 Submission
6.6 With editor
6.7 Transfer
Pretty fast, won't delay things.

Kecerb 2022-06-06

The text "5.31 submit" translates to "Submit by May 31st" in English.

The text "6.5 with editor" translates to "With editor by June 5th" in English.

童童的年 2022-06-05

Posted on May 11th, and only received the manuscript number with the editor on May 29th.

天涯若比邻 2022-06-05

It has been four days since I submitted, but I still haven't received a submission number. What could be the reason? Is anyone else in the same situation as me?

deeded 2022-06-03

5.12 under review
5.13 Required Reviews Completed
5.25 Required Reviews Completed
5.26 Required Reviews Completed
6.2 Revision
The text has been translated into English as follows:
5.12 under review
5.13 Required Reviews Completed
5.25 Required Reviews Completed
5.26 Required Reviews Completed
6.2 Revision
The editor is Samuel Smidt.

猫小麦 2022-06-01

Wouldn't it be certain to be rejected if there is no external review and it goes directly to DIP? My situation is the same as yours, it has been in DIP status all along, why isn't it rejected directly? It's such a waste of time.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now