Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

gerry 123 2022-04-05

Still with the editor...

vuvuvuvuv 2022-04-04

All four reviewers agreed to publish it, but the editor repeatedly requested language revisions. Even after getting an expert to revise it, the editor still demanded further language revisions. If you want money, just say it directly. The water is too deep.

王路飞 2022-04-04

May I ask if your paper has been submitted for review or if it has been rejected?

幽灵爱人44 2022-04-04

Does this journal have page charges?

vastgod 2022-03-29

The editor, Prof. Martin Malmsten, quickly sent the manuscript for review and responded promptly after receiving the reviewers' comments, providing feedback on the same day in most cases.
The questions and suggestions raised by the reviewers were very professional and greatly improved this piece of work.
Submitted on January 27, 2022.
Sent for review on January 29, 2022.
Major revisions made on February 13, 2022.
Returned on March 15, 2022.
Minor revisions made on March 25, 2022.
Accepted on March 28, 2022.
Congratulations and thanks to the journal, the editor, and the reviewers.

波澜壮阔 2022-03-25

2022.3.3 Submission
2022.3.20 Minor revision
2022.3.22 Rework
2022.3.24 Acceptance
An excellent journal with an immediate impact factor of 9.7, very efficient, and responsible editors. They also provided feedback on the grammar and other aspects of the article.

baobao-xiaowang 2022-03-24

The latest real-time impact factor of JCIS is 9.85.

gerry 123 2022-03-24

With editor for 11 days, is this the prelude to rejection? I see everyone's comments getting reviewed within one or two days. If you want to reject, please just do it directly, don't drag it out. I still need to graduate, sigh.

Accept88 2022-03-08

Excuse me, have you ever experienced a change from "Required reviews completed" to "under review"?

科研农民工1 2022-03-08

Why have I been submitting for four days and it still says "Submitted to Journal"? What is wrong with this journal?

JoeyYee 2022-02-22

The submission for minor revision has been received. From start to finish, it took 11 days, and the editor was really efficient.

三时三 2022-02-21

Hello, may I ask when did you submit your contribution?

小小欧巴 2022-02-20

The review process is fast, the reviewers are very good, and I hope the journal will continue to improve!

小愚 2022-02-12

November 16th - Submitting an article
December 11th - Minor revisions
December 26th - Re-submission
January 4th - Acceptance
A very good journal, and the comments from the reviewers are also very professional.

小愚 2022-02-12

Fast editing and fast review.

Viole 2022-02-11

Come and share some of your good luck with me, it has been a month and a half since I applied, and I still haven't received any news. It seems like everyone else is getting faster responses, I'm getting worried.

SUGMABALLS 2022-01-24

Posted on November 25, 2021, returned for major revisions on December 29, 2021, submitted major revisions on January 14, 2022, and accepted on January 21, 2022.

想不起来了 2022-01-13

November 15th - Submit article
December 16th - Receive revision comments, major revision
January 7th - Submit revised draft
January 10th - Minor revision
January 13th - Accepted
Great journal, hoping for continuous improvement! The editors and reviewers are very patient!!!

姒昃 2021-12-28

"After 2 days of submission, it shows 'under review,' but after a week, there is no review feedback. Editor Teresa J. Bandosz notifies that 80% of the submissions to their magazine have been rejected. What is going on? This is my first time experiencing this."

hum 2021-12-27

10-7投稿: Submitted on October 7th
10-8under review: Under review starting from October 8th
中间时间变动几次: The timeline changed several times
11-17major revision: Major revision due on November 17th
12月中旬返回: Return in mid-December
12月底accept: Accepted by the end of December
4个审稿人: 4 reviewers

XCY 2021-12-17

9.14 Submission
10.18 First review, two reviewers, major revisions
11.17 Revision after first review
11.26 One reviewer agrees, minor revisions from the other
12.07 Revision after second review
12.16 Acceptance
Overall, it was quite fast, around one month for the first review, and after the revision, the editor probably gave the reviewers around 10 days for the second review.
The editor was very responsible, as whenever the review comments were given, results were received in less than half a day.

纳米光电 2021-12-16

The entire process from submission to paper layout for this issue took a total of 40 days.

周国浪 2021-12-14

2021.09.23 Submission
2021.11.09 Received feedback for revision, one rejection, one major revision, two minor revisions
2021.11.22 Returned after modification
2021.12.14 Accepted
The duration in between was quite long, mostly in the "under review" status, probably due to the delay from the reviewers. However, the handling speed of the editor was fast, and the review process ended, with results provided within 1-2 days.

超超超超超支化 2021-12-13

6.15 Submission
10.17 Feedback with major revisions
12.1 Revised submission
12.11 Acceptance
The review process was a bit slow, possibly because no deadline was set for the reviewers
But the editor was very good and responsible
The result is good, so it's all good
Hope to be published in a higher-ranked section.

crystal12345 2021-12-06

But I received a rejection, the editor rejected it. The reviewer who rejected it clearly is not from my research field. The questions raised were very small and naive. Currently, there is still an argument going on. I don't know what will happen to this journal in the future, but I will only consider the upgraded version.

lss333 2021-12-06

The editor has a good working attitude, and all the desired articles seem to progress quickly and have results. The first article has finally been accepted.

叶@ 2021-12-05

Multiple reviews were conducted for this journal, with rejection comments provided. The editor can make major revisions directly, and then the revised version is sent back to the rejectees for further review, multiple times. In addition, this journal has made multiple miraculous operations, directly accepting the papers. The quality of the articles is truly astonishing!

crystal12345 2021-12-01

Excuse me, out of three reviewers, is there anyone who successfully argued against a rejection, whether it was a major revision or a minor revision?

baobao-xiaowang 2021-11-22

JICS real-time impact factor is 8.03, while JPS real-time impact factor is 7.90, and it is expected to approach the impact factor of JPS by June next year.

Dr Bill 2021-11-21

May I ask how many days it will take for you to reply to the message after editing, and approximately how long will it be reviewed?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now