潇洒哥 2023-02-10

As per estimation, the impact factor is expected to decrease in June this year, as the number of published articles throughout the year is too high. Please refrain from submitting articles on energy and batteries, and spare JAC.

Dr.tan 2023-02-08

22-11-21 Submission
22-12-14 Reviewed, 7 reviewers were consulted, major revisions needed
23-01-13 First round of revisions requested
23-01-28 Reviewed, minor revisions needed
23-02-03 Second round of revisions requested
23-02-08 Accepted

复制粘贴 2023-02-08

May I ask how long it takes for you to be under review with the editor?

SFAACEDVG 2023-02-07

How long have you been online?

复制粘贴 2023-02-07

2.6 avec éditeur translates to "2.6 with editor" in English.

SFAACEDVG 2023-02-06

I suspect the editor forgot about this matter.

Yazmin 2023-02-06

After submission and revisions, a total of five reviewers were involved, along with one editor. The topic was fluorescent probes. Among the five reviewers, it seemed that two of them had a good understanding and raised more specialized questions. The other two reviewers raised some basic questions or issues related to formatting and language. There was also one reviewer who seemed to lack understanding and asked unrelated questions. They had a unique perspective, asking about analysis from Figure A while referring to Figure B, providing a lengthy list of about twenty to thirty points, with very few key points.

queershanren 2023-02-05

Haha, what a coincidence! Your article was one that I reviewed, and I was impressed. There was this guy from Kazakhstan who recommended 20 unrelated pieces, and he wasn't satisfied with your revised version but still wanted you to cite it. It was really disgusting, so I couldn't help but send a private message to the editor, but they ignored me. Currently, there is still one person who hasn't given you feedback, and even the initial rejection reviewers agreed to accept it. This magazine is so speechless, insisting on waiting for everyone to give their opinions.

SFAACEDVG 2023-02-05

It has been ten days since the completion of the required reviews, and there has been no movement. I give up.

复制粘贴 2023-02-03

2.3 Submission
2.6 with editor
2.8 with editor
2.11 under review
-
-
-
4.25 acceptance

小孙aaa 2023-02-03

1.3 Submission
1.8 Under Review
2.1 Required Reviews Completed

小詹 2023-02-02

Too slow, it has been a long time for submission and it is still with the editor. The submission process is extremely strict, the reviewers cannot be from the same country, and there are various rules and restrictions. The main issue is the slow speed. Many units internally consider it a warning journal, not recommended!!!

pmj 2023-02-01

There are 9 reviewers, and their comments on the manuscript total 20 pages. One of the reviewers provided 20 references of their own and their team's work, which are unrelated to the content of this paper, and demanded that all of them be cited. I am unsettled by such comments, and it seems like the editor did not exercise basic judgment. All the comments require significant revisions, and it has been two weeks since the revised manuscript was submitted, but there is still no conclusion at present.

leo 2023-01-31

Excuse me, sir downstairs. Are you fixing a dip? It has been almost a week since I sent my major revision back to the editor. I'm feeling anxious...

luchao 2023-01-02

Can I please see the specific process? After 7 days with the editor, it is now "decision in process". I don't know if it will be directly rejected or accepted.

小见~ 2022-12-30

After my article went through major revisions, it changed from "under review" to "RRC" for a week, and then it went back to "under review" after a few hours. What is the situation?

潇洒哥 2022-12-26

Metallurgical Engineering Zone 1 also serves as a little consolation for the metal direction.

Yangliuyang 2022-12-22

May I ask which editor you chose at the time?

青平 2022-12-17

12.16 Required Reviews Completed.

话梅糖cc 2022-12-12

20220927 submit - Submitted on September 27, 2022.
20221007 with editor - Under editor's review on October 7, 2022.
20221011 under review - Under general review on October 11, 2022.
20221110 major revisions (with one reviewer and editor's comments) - Major revisions requested by one reviewer and editor on November 10, 2022.
20221206 revise - Revised on December 6, 2022.
20221209 accept - Accepted on December 9, 2022.

青平 2022-12-12

Sent 2+ reviewers, one of the reviewers completed the review on 12.04.

caseone 2022-12-12

2022.11.30 Under Review
2022.12.05 Under Review
Previously, there was a mistake in writing 2022, it was written as 2011.
There have been so many changes in the status "Under Review," what's the situation? Is there anyone who knows about it?

Dr.tan 2022-12-08

My current status is "Review completed, awaiting editorial decision."

caseone 2022-12-07

Okay, thank you! Congratulations to my research friend for successfully receiving and best of luck!

巽为风 2022-12-06

Two reviewers provided a total of 15 comments. Both reviewers highly appreciated my work, with one considering it meaningful and valuable, and the other finding it interesting. Both agreed that the suggested revisions based on the references were suitable for publication. The editor mentioned that the introduction presented work that was somewhat outdated and not closely related to current affairs. This gave me the opportunity to rewrite that section and update the relevant references. I am very grateful for the editor and reviewers' review. The entire process went smoothly, especially thanks to the efficiency of Editor Liu. I wish all my fellow researchers success in publishing and good luck!

巽为风 2022-12-06

Sent four reviewers, only two accepted the review.

hydrogen 2022-12-05

But until now, it has not been included in SCI. Does anyone know the reason? It has been four months already.

hydrogen 2022-12-05

5.6 submitted to the journal
5.27 under review
6.19 major revision
6.28 modification submission + with editor
7.30 accepted directly

caseone 2022-12-05

How many reviewers are there? Is the reviewing process fast enough?

巽为风 2022-12-05

10.1 submitted to the journal
10.9 with editor + under review
10.14 under review
11.1 major revision
11.11 revised submission + with editor
11.16 under review
12.4 Accept
Overall, it went relatively smoothly. Thank you, Editor Liu!