静等花开 2022-12-22

Dear, have you heard any news about the repair that has been going on for over a month? I'm anxious. My November 25th return for repair is still in peer review, and I'm crying.

育东 2022-12-22

Dream come true. Very lucky to have a fast submission acceptance.
2022.11.1 submitted
2022.11.31 major revision
2022.12.15 revised
2022.12.22 accepted with one format modification in between.

Frank211 2022-12-17

Found it, thank you!

Frank211 2022-12-17

May I ask how to access the instruction and form?

Frank211 2022-12-17

May I ask where to enter and see?

wex 2022-12-16

Check the status in the instruction & forms section to see if there have been any changes.

Frank211 2022-12-16

Posted on 2022.11.29, until today 12.15, it has been over half a month and it is still under review. The manuscript has not yet been externally reviewed. What is everyone's current speed? Is it because the Christmas efficiency is low? I hope everyone can share. I wonder if I should remind the editor... feeling anxious.

4523 2022-12-15

Excuse me everyone, will JAFC be able to retain its position in Zone 1 in the upcoming 2022 Chinese Academy of Sciences partition?

4523 2022-12-07

Hello everyone, good evening. I would like to ask about the repair of two major repairs and three minor repairs. In this situation, how long will it take to receive news about the return repair? It has been half a month since it was sent for repair. Thank you all.

中不了太难了 2022-12-06

The phrase "Supporting information for review only" means that the provided information is intended only for the purpose of review. It suggests that the information should not be used or referenced for any other purpose than reviewing.

As for a template, you can use the following format to convey a similar message:

--------------------
[Title or Heading]

[Body of the message]

Dear [Recipient's Name],

I am writing to provide you with supporting information for review. Please note that this information is intended exclusively for the purpose of review and should not be utilized or referred to for any other reason.

[Provide details or attach the supporting information as necessary]

If you have any questions or require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
--------------------

流星雨 2022-11-30

Hello, I am also assigned as this editor. May I ask if he is efficient?

流星雨 2022-11-30

I am also an editor, may I ask if he is efficient?

fanny0813 2022-11-25

Submitted on April 23rd, received feedback in one month, with input from three reviewers. The feedback was very constructive. Applied for two extensions to conduct additional experiments, and the editor responded promptly and approved both extensions. The editor is responsible and will send a reminder in another half month. Accepted in August, this journal is considered fast.

土豆094 2022-11-23

22.08.15 Under Review
22.09.08 In Peer Review
22.10.09 Major Review
22.11.09 In Peer Review
In the meantime, there was a reminder, and it took one month for the submission to be reviewed. Two reviewers provided feedback, one suggesting major revisions and the other suggesting minor revisions. Currently, we are still waiting for the revised version. Overall, the handling editor has been responsible and the review comments provided were detailed. We hope for acceptance.

劲松挺拔 2022-11-22

Did you return using the supervisor's account or your own account? I returned for revision as the first author, but it reminded me that I need to be approved for submission. The status is still under review now. The supervisor said he didn't see the option for approval submission.

大明 2022-11-19

My manuscript was submitted on September 19th and returned for minor revisions on October 16th. It went through three reviewers, with one accepting it for publication without any suggestions, the second providing 9 suggestions for improvement but ultimately rejecting it, and the third also giving positive feedback but with 6 suggestions for rejection. The editor did not adopt their suggestions and returned it for minor revisions, asking me to address the comments from the second and third reviewers. The revised manuscript was returned on October 24th and accepted on November 18th.

大地行者 2022-11-15

Mine too, I sent it for major repair on October 20th and it's been 26 days today with no response. It has been constantly under review. Can I ask how long it took for them to reply to you in the end? Is it normal for it to take this long?

4523 2022-11-15

Hello, where can I see whether the edits provided are major or minor? Is it in the "Instruction and Form" section? The description above is about major revisions, while the one below seems to indicate that your article has received a minor revision decision.

zyg 2022-11-11

Is there any cost for this journal, such as page fees? Thank you.

zyg 2022-11-11

Hello, may I ask if there is a fee for this issue of the journal, such as a layout fee?

L* 2022-11-09

Do any classmates know if John Peter Munafo has a high editing efficiency?

4523 2022-11-08

The article is accepted.

tianhaizhi 2022-10-24

Classmate, how long does it take to submit the assigned edits for review?

幸运加运气 2022-10-21

Excuse me, is it major repair or minor repair? Thank you.

邵陈禹 2022-10-21

22.8.3 Submission
22.9.1 Repair
22.10.18 Repair
22.10.21 Acceptance
Wishing the journal better and better! Good experience.

幸运加运气 2022-10-18

Hello classmate, can you add me as a friend? I want to ask you who edited the JAFC that you submitted.

爬科研的山跨企业的河 2022-10-18

I would like to ask the senior colleagues for some advice. Is it necessary to write a statement on the manuscript's significance? How should it be written? Are there any templates available? Thank you very much.

幸运加运气 2022-10-13

Original: 楼主，请问你的文章的编辑是谁呢，谢谢哈
Translation: Original poster, may I ask who is the editor of your article? Thank you!

幸运加运气 2022-10-13

Excuse me, for this status of yours, is there a final decision or is it something you wrote yourself? Thank you!

龙旭 2022-10-13

After returning, it will be displayed as "peer" both in the hands of the editor and when returning to the reviewers. Generally, we consider that if a reply is received within 8-10 days, it is basically not sent for review again. If there is no response for more than a week, it is basically sent out again.