Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

呵呵嘛哩哄 2023-06-15

How are you? Have you come back yet?

呵呵嘛哩哄 2023-06-07

I have been waiting for the second trial for a month, /(ㄒoㄒ)/~~

jiayou 2023-06-07

May I ask how long have you been waiting for the second review? I have been waiting for over 40 days for the second review. Have they assigned a new reviewer?

酒醉的蝴蝶 2023-06-06

... However, the editor-in-chief is German.

春哥123 2023-06-05

Americans have started their summer vacation at the end of May, and are currently on holiday, so the processing speed of manuscripts may be slower.

jiayou 2023-06-05

I returned on April 28th.

春哥123 2023-06-05

I am too. Major repairs on April 25th, return on May 23rd. There is no news now, and it has been under review all along.

jiayou 2023-06-03

The major repairs returned for review on the second day, and it has been 37 days already without any news. What's going on? Does anyone have a similar situation?

dk仙凡 2023-06-02

Is it? It's been more than half a month and there is no news about the appointment of an associate editor, and I dare not ask either.

dk仙凡 2023-06-02

Are you someone who only submits for external review once every few months?

dk仙凡 2023-06-02

The deputy editor has been assigned for more than half a month, but there is still no sign of external review. I don't know what the situation is, and I dare not ask for fear of being rejected as soon as I ask.

酒醉的蝴蝶 2023-06-01

Do you have any friends who have submitted their revisions and are waiting for approval?
The reviewer just asked me to change the format of one reference. I made the modifications and uploaded them on the same day, and the editor sent it back for review again.
Maybe I was too impatient and quick. The editor is not confident and wants to have the reviewer take another look.
Submitting minor revisions for review is more frustrating than submitting major revisions. It's nerve-wracking.

小小欣加加油 2023-05-31

Hello, may I ask if you can send me a copy of the author's guide? I haven't been able to find it, thank you very much!

PhD Gao 2023-05-30

It's been 6 weeks, it's been too long.

呵呵嘛哩哄 2023-05-29

Help, how long does the second trial usually take? The first trial was a major overhaul.

Leo-wang 2023-05-27

Post on February 21, 2023;
Sent for review on February 24, 2023;
Minor review on April 26, 2023, with four reviewers, one of whom had three comments mainly regarding grammar and description issues;
Revised submission made on April 28, 2023;
Accepted on May 4, 2023.

BIOLE 2023-05-27

4.1 Submission, 5.26 Feedback received, rejection, but given an opportunity to resubmit after making revisions.

gt a 2023-05-18

2022.12.30 Submission
2023.1.6 Under review
2023.2.1 Return, suggest to submit to another journal or resubmit after revision
2023.2.23 Resubmit after revision
2023.3.18 Return, major revision required
2023.4.3 Submit after major revision
2023.5.4 Accepted

BIOLE 2023-05-18

Submitted on 4.1, under "Editorial Office" it shows "Under Review" on 5.18; clicking on "Instructions & Forms" - the status shows "In Peer Review. Your manuscript is being evaluated by researchers in your field."

I don't know how many more weeks I have to wait, hoping for good luck.

Marco617 2023-05-15

I want to know how it is now. I applied on March 20th, and now it's May 15th. It has been almost two months and I still haven't received the results. I don't know what the situation is.

周某虫 2023-05-14

I am also this editor, what about you? Did you submit it for review later?

周某虫 2023-05-10

It's not that I didn't send it, it's that I haven't updated the status. The speed of this journal is acceptable; usually, if it hasn't been rejected for about ten days, it means it's under review. However, sometimes the editors really don't like updating the status. I see many people facing the same situation.

xq1996 2023-05-10

Did you submit it for review later?

xq1996 2023-05-06

May I ask what happened later?

AZW 2023-05-06

Soon, the editor in charge is responsible for the professional reviewers.
3.2 Submission
3.6 Review
4.18 Revisions (2 reviewers provided 13 revisions; editor had no additional revisions)
4.28 Resubmission
5.3 Revisions (minor formatting revisions)
5.3 Resubmission
5.5 Acceptance

Hope the journal will continue to improve.

Rainning Willow 2023-04-22

It has been a month, and there is still no change.

UR Accpeted 2023-04-20

22-Jan, 2023 Submission;
24-Jan, 2023 Assigned as associate editor; Two weeks later, it entered peer review.
20-Mar, 2023 Received reviewer comments, minor revisions requested; Surprisingly, the editor's email mentioned major revisions.. Given one month to make the revisions.
11-Apr, 2023 Submitted revised manuscript;
18-Apr, 2023 Received acceptance email;

Overall speed is good, reviewers are professional, first impression of this journal is positive.

Doctor12th 2023-04-19

Has there been any change? I have also been the deputy editor-in-chief for 6 days, and there has been no change in my situation.

梁学友 2023-04-15

May I ask what is the rate of paper similarity for your submission?

半缘修道半缘君 2023-04-12

How long did it take for you to submit it for review after you were assigned as the editor at that time?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now