颖哥 2023-03-14

Seeking advice, how can I contact the editor-in-chief to send a reminder for the manuscript? I can't find their email address.

shark_Estrella 2023-03-13

I won't consider this journal anymore. I submitted it around September and it has been "under review" ever since. I have reminded them a few times during this period, but the journal editors have not replied. Additionally, the official website of the journal is poorly designed and nothing can be done on it.

YYDBB 2023-03-04

May I ask how the original poster asked the question? My situation is similar to yours. I submitted in early November, and it shows "reviews completed 2+" with the most recent activity on February 3rd. However, it has been stagnant since then, and I don't know if I still need to find reviewers.

天涯的心跳 2023-03-01

The editor said that three people have already submitted their revised manuscripts... Are we still waiting for the fourth person? The latest deadline for the review activity has been updated to March 1st. Does that mean the deadline for submitting revised manuscripts is approaching?

科研的小马 2023-02-28

According to my experience, at least 3, usually 4.

All is well 123 2023-02-28

How can I contact the responsible editor to urge for the manuscript? It has been reviewed for 5 months already, I tried using the 163 email but couldn't send it.

秋风暖暖 2023-02-22

The arbitration reviewer also affirmed the originality and practicality of the paper.

秋风暖暖 2023-02-22

Added an arbitration reviewer, the associate editor asked for changes, the editor rejected me directly. Unbelievable.

天涯的心跳 2023-02-21

The following text translates to English as: "The submission was made at the end of November last year, and it is still under review. I sent an email to ask if only three reviewers have provided revision comments. Just curious, how many reviewers does Einstein or ISA usually have?"

天涯的心跳 2023-02-16

No response from me, oh...

Mcc_ 2023-02-13

"Have you received a reply?"

天涯的心跳 2023-02-01

In my article's first review, it shows that the tracking link is reviewed completely, but why haven't they sent me an email yet? It has been nearly 20 days. It is still under review status. I want to send an email to remind them... Can someone please give me advice on what to do?

秋风暖暖 2023-01-18

Who knows how the editor-in-chief of this journal will make the decision?

秋风暖暖 2023-01-18

If there are three acceptances and one rejection in the second review of ISA, will it be directly rejected by the associate editor?

海派流星 2023-01-09

I haven't received the email for plagiarism check so far.

BoBoHarry 2023-01-08

Hello, may I ask if there is a need for plagiarism check in the fourth round?

海派流星 2023-01-07

2022-5-30 Submission
2022-7-30 First round of major revisions, 6 reviewers
2022-9-22 Revised
2022-10-15 Second round of major revisions, 5 reviewers
2022-10-15 Revised
2022-11-12 Third round of minor revisions, 4 reviewers, 3 agree with minor revisions
2022-11-12 Revised
2022-12-17 Fourth round of minor revisions, 1 reviewer
2022-12-17 Revised
2023-1-7 Accepted

追风er 2023-01-06

Correction: Required reviews completed on 2023.01.02.

追风er 2023-01-06

2022.11.19 submit
2022.12.06 under review
2022.12.06 required reviews completed
2023.01.06 reject

5 reviewers, 4 of them are positive (leaning towards minor revisions), 1 strongly rejects (innovative issue, lack of experiments)
The review process was timely and the comments were helpful. After making the necessary revisions, I plan to submit the paper elsewhere. I wish the journal continued success and I will attempt to publish another good paper with experimental data in the future.

NN128 2023-01-04

Dear contributors, is the requirement for the initial screening of this magazine that the repetition rate should be less than 25% and each individual article should be less than 2%? It seems a bit difficult to have each article be less than 2%, would it be acceptable if it is exactly 2%?

drtfvjbniujnucrttfyguhjkzxcvbn 2022-11-08

May I study the articles you posted on ISA in September?

lcqlcq 2022-10-31

Hello, may I ask if the status of your editor invitation has changed? How long has it been?

lcqlcq 2022-10-31

Is it necessary to use genuine software for plagiarism checking?

lcqlcq 2022-10-31

Hello, may I ask how long did the status of "Editor invited" last after you submitted your contribution? Thank you.

lcqlcq 2022-10-31

Hello, may I ask how long did the "Editor invited" status last after you submitted your contribution? Mine has been going on for 13 days already, and it feels very slow.

Taylor0304 2022-10-31

Submitted in February, undergoing one major revision and one minor revision, lasting for more than eight months. Thank you to the editor-in-chief, Qingguo Wang! I hope ISA will continue to improve!
2.27 Submitted
7.15 Major revision (5 reviewers)
8.11 Resubmitted
9.17 Decision in process / Under review (strange, decision changed back to under review)
10.18 Decision in process
10.22 Minor revision (removing the references of the reviewers, checking for plagiarism)
10.30 Accept
The review process took a bit long, and the editor-in-chief seems to have fixed working hours (Saturday).

北极向北 2022-10-29

Posted on November 30, 2021, after two major revisions and one minor revision, accepted on October 29, 2022.

1. The first round of review took over two months, major revision:
The editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief, and seven reviewers provided over 30 comments. The language and innovation requirements were high, and a reply to the manuscript alone was over 60 pages.

2. The second round of review took over two months, major revision:
Only two reviewers provided comments in the first round, and the journal added three new reviewers. The comments provided were easier to respond to, and a major revision was done.

3. The third round of review took 56 days, minor revision, with only one reviewer providing some modification suggestions.

4. On October 29, officially accepted: After three revisions, received the acceptance notice within ten days.

Once again, I deeply appreciate the time and effort invested by the editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief, and all the reviewers in the article, which allowed it to make a qualitative leap. Finally, I wish everyone a smooth submission process and many successful papers!

ss190103 2022-10-24

Can the single-article repetition rate be equal to 2%?

昊昊haohao 2022-10-24

My major overhaul has already been back for six and a half months. Oh my, I am super anxious. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh.

hhhyc 2022-10-24

Do I have to check on the official English website of iThenticate? Why can't I register?