energy storage 2021-11-30

The first review has been almost five months already. I have been communicating with customer service, but only two reviewers have been providing feedback, while the journal requires three. It's so slow.

yunxiao 2021-10-22

I have submitted two papers, and both have been accepted. One was accepted after five months, and the other after four months. The review process took about two months for both papers. I highly recommend choosing Ulrich Gross.

summerdog 2021-09-28

Hello, may I ask how long does it usually take for you to review? Who is the editor?

沉默味道 2021-06-29

The journal processing speed is very fast, and the comments provided by the reviewers are also very helpful for the paper. Thank you.

lzjt 2021-06-20

Heat transfer is a well-established journal in the field, with a moderate level of recognition within the industry. The first round of review is relatively slow, taking 8 months, while the second round takes 2 months. The review comments are helpful in improving the quality of the articles. Wishing THESCI continued success in their future endeavors.

小火0426 2021-05-25

May I ask who your editor is?

V逐梦之光V 2021-04-15

A well-established journal in the field of thermal science, but the review time and editors may vary, and it is possible to be quite slow. Thermodynamics related to the combustion field can also be submitted, and engineering thermophysics and other directions are relatively recognized. However, it is not considered a top journal. Friends who are involved in combustion and heat transfer research can learn from each other and exchange ideas.

孩子想毕业 2021-04-15

One month for the initial review, one major revision and one minor revision, and half a month to complete the changes and resubmit. The second review takes one week to complete. The reviewer for the minor revision needs to add something in the conclusion, and it is submitted after one day of supplementation. It is accepted the following day. This time the speed is very fast, worth recommending.

小张拥有盖世运气 2021-03-09

May I ask if this journal has already selected all the reviewers from the beginning? Will the "under review" status be updated with a new timestamp after the initial "under review" period? Will the same reviewers be assigned for the second round of review?

羊哥er 2021-02-11

October 14th - New draft
October 23rd - Under review
January 12th - Major revision
January 15th - Resubmit
February 10th - Accept

Due to the long duration of the first review, which exceeded two months, an email was sent to inquire about the status. Cathy CASTELAIN quickly replied and promised to urge the reviewers. The first review comments were received a week later. Although it required major revisions, it did not affect the essence of the article. The revisions were completed within three days and the article was accepted in less than a month. Overall, it was considered fortunate. It seems that the reviewers highly value the attitude of the authors in responding to their comments. If every point is addressed and modified in the manuscript, they feel respected.

有梦想的陽 2021-01-20

Submitted in September 2020, the editing process was fast, and it was sent for review the next day. In November, I received the first round of comments from three reviewers, totaling over ten suggestions, requiring significant revisions. The revised version was submitted the following month, and by the end of December, I received the second round of comments. One reviewer was not entirely satisfied with the first revision, leading to another round of significant revisions. On January 18, 2021, the revised manuscript was resubmitted, and surprisingly, it was accepted on January 20. The process was quick, and the efficiency was high. This marks my first SCI publication, a memorable milestone.