zibiao 2021-10-10

Submission 8.06
Review 8.23
Received revision comments 9.10
Revised manuscript returned 9.26
Accepted 10.08

SKY FLY 2021-10-07

Translated into English, the text reads:

Received 22 April 2021
Received in revised form 7 September 2021
Accepted 26 September 2021

hityingph 2021-10-06

Received at Editorial Office 23 Aug 2021: This means that the article was received by the editorial office on August 23, 2021.

Article revised 29 Sep 2021: This indicates that the article underwent revisions on September 29, 2021.

Article accepted for publication 4 Oct 2021: This states that the article was approved for publication on October 4, 2021.

青萝萧 2021-09-02

投出 at the end of May
Returned with feedback at the end of June
Returned after modification in July
Hired on August 22nd

咩咩咩 2021-08-17

Posted in December 2020, accepted in July 2021, went through two rounds of minor revisions. The reviewer said it was minor revisions, but raised very critical questions. I had to redo all the results before it was approved. It coincided with my graduation thesis defense, so I was extremely busy and delayed two more times before finally completing the revisions.

秋风吹落叶 2021-08-11

It has been two weeks since submission, and it is still "with editor", and the status has not changed at all. It's too slow.

Qz 2021-08-04

4.30 - submit to journal
5.6 - under review
6.9 - minor revision and modification (Editor: Khellil Sefiane)
7.5 - submit revised manuscript
7.20 - required reviews completed
8.4 - accept

DONG_DUT 2021-07-20

The first review took about two and a half months, with some minor revisions (but there were also quite a few comments). I worked on the revisions for almost a month and then resubmitted for reevaluation. The reevaluation process took nearly three months, and finally, my submission was accepted.

The processing speed was too slow, taking a whole six months from the initial submission to acceptance. It may be because this journal receives a large number of submissions, so the editorial processing speed is a bit slow...

xiaohaoohehe 2021-07-13

Good brother, what is your current situation? I have been in review for one and a half months, and it is still under review...

飞翔123 2021-07-05

Excuse me, experts. How is your speed of reviewing? How long does the first review usually take?
Here is my timeline:
- 4.13 submitted to the journal
- 4.21 with editor
- 5.2 under review
Currently, I haven't received the first review comments yet. It feels a bit slow.

称昵者作 2021-06-18

2.17 submission
4.25 revision
5.23 response
6.10 required reviews completed
6.16 accept

梁公子丶 2021-06-13

Congratulations, congratulations. May I trouble you to ask how long each stage generally takes? It has been over 10 days since I submitted my manuscript with the editor, and there has been no progress so far. If I want to remind them, should I send a message through the official email system or use my own email to send them a message?

lgy 2021-06-11

The first SCI paper in my life, thanks to IJHMT. The research direction is two-phase heat transfer. I submitted it in March and went through a revision process. The three reviewers were all very efficient and provided professional opinions. It took nearly a month to receive the revised manuscript. It was accepted in June, which took approximately three months in total.

钉子 2021-05-29

You are really patient, it's been so long. It's almost nine months now, and you can still wait. I had to send several reminder emails during the first review, which took almost three months, and now it's the second review. If I had to wait this long, I would definitely withdraw my submission.

钉子 2021-05-29

I have also been submitting for a long time, and I am currently in the state of waiting for revisions and review. This journal is indeed a bit slow, as another article I submitted at the same time has already been published online in a different journal.

泡泡 2021-05-15

Posted on November 15, 2020, the Required Reviews were completed two months later. Then, it took almost a month with the editor, followed by another month under review. Afterward, the Required Reviews were completed again, and it took about a week with the editor before receiving minor revisions. It took three weeks to receive the revised feedback, and shortly after that, it was under review with the editor. Two weeks later, the Required Reviews were completed again, followed by nearly 2 weeks with the editor and under review. Finally, the Required Reviews were completed, and it took about two days with the editor to accept. In total, it took 6 months to be accepted.

The peer review comments were considered professional and thorough, although there were nearly 30 minor revisions, which seemed a bit excessive. Additionally, the review process took longer after the revisions compared to cases that were accepted within 2-3 months, making the overall duration of 6 months feel slightly longer.

YW 2021-05-13

Posted on December 16, 2020, reviewed on December 27, and received review comments on March 19, 2021. There were a total of three reviewers, and there was one change in the corresponding review completion date, presumably due to one reviewer's feedback. The first reviewer raised three questions and suggested acceptance after revisions. The second reviewer did not provide any comments and recommended acceptance. The third reviewer provided 15 major comments and 10 minor comments (regarding word usage and sentence structure adjustments). The editor requested minor revisions, which took one month. The revised manuscript was submitted on April 16, 2021, reviewed on April 22, and marked as required reviews completed on April 27. The manuscript was accepted on May 11. This is my first article during my doctoral studies, and I am extremely excited. I wish the journal continued success.

little_cai 2021-05-04

It was rejected without being reviewed. This Japanese editor has been dragging me for a long time.

Heat and Mass 2021-04-20

The Japanese editor and their team keep flooding the paper with their own arguments. When they see Chinese papers, they easily reject them as "out of scope," acting so arrogantly.

V逐梦之光V 2021-04-15

Top journals in the field of heat transfer science, with a reasonable review time. Research papers in the field of combustion related to thermal science can also be submitted, but they must have innovative scientific problems related to combustion, preferably focusing on combustion and thermal issues. Friends who are engaged in combustion-related research can learn from each other and exchange ideas.

Grinding boy 2021-04-12

The first time submitting to this journal, it was indeed quite fast. I was a bit worried at first since I am not specialized in thermodynamics. The first review took one month and required minor revisions. After ten days, I received the revised manuscript and submitted it for the second review. The second review took twenty days and also required minor revisions (one reviewer pointed out several unit errors). Two days later, I received the revised manuscript and it was marked as "required reviews completed," indicating that the reviewer also approved. Half a month later, the manuscript was accepted. Overall, the journal's feedback was very professional.

Haizhu Li 2021-03-31

What is the acceptable plagiarism rate for this journal?

Olaf 2021-03-11

I am one of the five reviewers, and I have a lot of opinions. Can we have a V communication?

appleman 2021-03-08

Seven reviewers, it's too exaggerated, they replied with a total of seven full pages of comments.

appleman 2021-03-04

Excuse me, everyone. This is my first time submitting to the International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. The status "Required Reviews Completed" has changed its date three times in one week. What does this mean? Does the date change every time there is feedback from reviewers?

羊哥er 2021-02-11

2020/05/05 - received
2020/05/24 - under review
2020/06/24 - minor revision
2020/07/15 - response
2020/08/03 - accept

First of all, I would like to praise the efficiency of HMT! I never thought I could get a top journal article accepted in just three months, which is a great start to my doctoral career. Secondly, the main focus of the article was numerical simulation, and I thought it would require major revisions. However, to my surprise, it only needed minor revisions in the first review. I feel that the journal values the innovation in analysis or research direction, and I consider myself lucky in this regard.

风度 2021-01-07

Hello, friend, can I add you on WeChat?