7akeD 2022-03-21

May I ask how long the major repair will take?

jxiong 2022-03-20

Received so quickly! Impressive!

Ray032 2022-03-14

2022.1.3 Submission
2022.2.2 Major Revision
2022.2.8 Return
2022.2.25 Major Revision
2022.2.27 Return
2022.3.10 Accepted

The second submission, a journal with the highest impact factor in the nuclear field, was very fast, highly praised for its speed, journal, and editors.

CHEN yalou 2022-02-14

Submitted on 2022.02.12, just marking it, hoping for a good outcome!

我是大明星 2022-01-25

2022.01.25 submission, just marking it.

哎哟喂厉害了喂 2022-01-15

2021.12.20 Submission
2022.1.14 Major revision
The response was quite quick, and the editor was also good. The self-citation rate of the journal has indeed increased. It came out of the warning list in December 2021, and I hope the journal will continue to improve.

风一样的男人89 2021-12-04

Posted on July 27, 2021
Major revision on August 27, 2021
Return on October 20, 2021
Major revision on October 28, 2021
Return for revision on October 31, 2021
Accepted on November 21, 2021
The editors and reviewers responded quickly. There were five reviewers, each providing more than ten comments, which greatly inspired the revisions of the paper. It also took a lot of time to respond to each comment. Personally, after the revision, the editor gave the second reviewer about 15 days. If the reviewer does not reply, they will wait for another week, and then make a conclusion. This may not be accurate, but it is for reference. The conception, writing, and publication of papers are not easy. I hope that efforts will be rewarded and persistence will lead to victory.

请叫我苗哥 2021-09-19

Cannot access the proofreading link, have you encountered this before?

请叫我苗哥 2021-09-19

Why can't I access the proofreading link? Has anyone encountered this before?

徐磊 2021-08-26

Hello, may I ask what does it mean to have two "under review"?

xjtu.tum 2021-08-03

This magazine is not an open-source magazine, so where does the article page fee come from?

zasphalt 2021-08-02

Medium-level warning, no consideration for workload performance, no reimbursement for paper publication fees, no issuance of paper rewards, can only be "wow" ...

Violet 2021-07-07

In 2021, IF=5.1, self-citation rate is 35%, excluding self-citation IF=3.3. Due to the exaggerated self-citation rate, an alert was issued. However, looking at the IF excluding self-citation, it still shows certain strength.

电力电子让人头秃 2021-07-05

I spent almost a year repairing and revising my comprehensive review paper, and finally, after two rounds of revisions, it was accepted.

In the first round of revisions, there were four reviewers, two positive and two negative, and they provided more than 50 opinions. It was difficult to meet everyone's expectations, but I managed to use up the three-month deadline for revisions.

In the second round, there was one persistent reviewer who felt that there was insufficient innovation. However, our review paper focuses on novelty and comprehensiveness, and it is difficult to compare the originality and contribution with research papers.

With a mix of anticipation and nervousness, I finally submitted it and it was accepted.

In 2020, the impact factor was 5.164, surpassing 5. Could you please check it out, ZHONGKEYUAN? They don't require any publication fees and there are no specific formatting requirements. It would be great if such a conscientious journal doesn't issue a warning. Please, I beg you.

yalong 2021-06-02

This journal is already at the intermediate warning level, can we continue to invest in it?

zzf321 2021-05-13

2020.12.29 Submission
2021.2.8 Major revision
2021.3.22 Revision
2021.4.17 Major revision
2021.4.19 Revision
2021.4.25 Accepted
2021.5.10 Online
It was quite difficult for the first submission to SCI. One reviewer rejected the paper twice with firm rejection. Fortunately, the other two reviewers provided opportunities and the editor finally accepted it. Overall, this journal is good and the reviewers' comments are professional, clearly from fellow experts in the field.

yellowvase 2021-05-12

2020.12.15 Submission
2021.03.26 Major revision
2021.04.24 Rework
2021.05.11 Acceptance
First of all, thank you, Brother San, for accepting it!
The two reviewers reviewed the paper quickly and carefully, and the editor also provided some suggestions.
Possibly due to the impact of the pandemic, the time for the editor to make a decision during the first review was a bit long.

BOSH 2021-04-27

The translation of the text "速度很快，审稿意见很专业" into English is "The speed is fast, and the review comments are very professional."

clairka 2021-04-17

Submitted February 11, 2021
Final revisions submitted April 12, 2021
Accepted April 13, 2021
Graduation requirement, the process was relatively quick. Three reviewers provided some simple suggestions, and the professional nature of the reviews was acceptable. However, it feels like it was assigned to a lower-ranking category.

MAYAAA 2021-04-07

In the process of submission, is it mandatory to fill in the recommended reviewers? I don't personally know any potential reviewers.

MAYAAA 2021-04-07

In the submission, is it required to fill in the recommended reviewers? Are there any recommendations?

xylxydtlsy 2021-03-31

I have submitted several times, often with four or five reviewers. There are many review comments, and the review process is strict. It is a very good journal. I have been rejected before, but also accepted. The acceptance range in the research field is broad, and it is not easy to have direct rejections due to research field mismatch. If it is currently in the warning period, it would be quite challenging to make so many revisions and may not receive favorable responses. I suspect that the journal may have a high self-citation rate, which triggered the warning. Nevertheless, I still think it is a very good journal and hope that the self-citation rate will decrease soon.

wangjhoo 2021-03-16

The editor has offended someone.

zzz111 2021-03-15

The school is now issuing documents. The warning journal does not count as workload. I am really fed up. Other water journals did not make it to the list. What problem did this journal have?

电力电子让人头秃 2021-03-14

I also think that there should be no layout fee, and it should also be free format. It is simply the conscience of the industry.

暖鸟 2021-03-11

Maybe the self-citation rate is a bit high? (Just a guess)

努力科研 2021-03-08

I chose the wrong field, I am in the energy field.

努力科研 2021-03-08

2021.2.1 submitted
2021.2.27 rejected
Three reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision, and one outright rejection stating that the article lacks meaning.
Editorial rejection.

斑马斑马1991 2021-03-06

I also want to know. I feel that the quality of some water publications is much higher than I thought, but there is no warning for those.

wc9963 2021-03-06

I feel that the journal editor is quite responsible. Can anyone tell me the reason for the alert?