Verified Reviews - International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Chao 2023-06-12

zzzzer, there is room for improvement without rejection. Keep going.

zzzzer 2023-06-12

Edited by Maria Michela Corsaro, there are two reviewers in total. One reviewer clearly discriminates and rejects the paper with just one sentence mentioning animal experiments.

Chao 2023-06-12

zzzzer, what major repairs did you receive today? Who is the editor?

zzzzer 2023-06-12

6.12大修 translates to "major renovation on June 12th."

Chao 2023-06-12

zzzzer, um yes, everything has been done.

junfeng 2023-06-12

Just returned these past two days, fortunately did not have to make up for the experiment.

zzzzer 2023-06-12

Hello, the structures of three polysaccharides have all been analyzed, and methylation has been performed along with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

Chao 2023-06-12

Junfeng, it's possible that this indicates the reviewer has no comments and just copied the title. Have you already received the second round of review?

Chao 2023-06-12

zzzzer, three polysaccharides, no activity, the questions raised by the reviewer are quite professional, and the analysis also addresses the raised questions.

junfeng 2023-06-12

This is one of the reviewer's comments. Did the reviewer accidentally paste the wrong information? Should we ask the editor about it? Please help, experts!

半山33 2023-06-12

Is this magazine only being reported?

zzzzer 2023-06-12

Hello, how many polysaccharides do you have? Are they structurally and functionally active? Did the first reviewer ask any questions regarding structural analysis?

Chao 2023-06-12

In our boss's email, I'm not sure, but we all work on polysaccharides. The timing is similar, so it should be edited by one person. If you have started working on it, mine might be done soon too.

zzzzer 2023-06-12

I haven't returned for repair yet, I don't know about editing, who is your editor?

Chao 2023-06-12

zzzzer, do you know who edited your work?

zzzzer 2023-06-12

Is it complete in just 5 days? That's too fast.

Drinkstea 2023-06-12

5.26 submitted
5.27 with editor
6.6 under review
6.11 required reviews completed

Translation:
5.26 submitted
5.27 with editor
6.6 under review
6.11 required reviews completed

Drinkstea 2023-06-12

Has the result come out now?

Chao 2023-06-10

What is the name of your editor? We might have the same editor. I also work with polysaccharides.

zzzzer 2023-06-10

Yes, make more sugar.

Chao 2023-06-10

zzzzer, are you a polysaccharide producer?

zzzzer 2023-06-10

Hello, I only have two reviewers. If their opinions differ, it's likely that it will be rejected directly. It's not possible to delay it for so long.

Chao 2023-06-10

zzzzer, the opinions that may be retracted are diverse, and then wait for the editor to review again. I was in this situation before.

zzzzer 2023-06-10

I am the first reviewer, received all the comments, and it has been two weeks since the RRC. I don't know why.

Chao 2023-06-10

The third review has collected all opinions, and it has been a week since RRC. I don't know what's going on. Is there any similar friend who can answer? TAT

雪樱子多糖的结构与功效 2023-06-09

I did not perform methylation, which is also an important reason for my guilty conscience when submitting the manuscript. It costs 4000 yuan per sample to have Borui Tang perform methylation, which is too expensive. San Shu might be much cheaper, but methylation testing also has requirements for sample quantity. Mine is an acidic sugar, and I have tried several times. I couldn't do the first step of sugar aldehyde acid reduction well, and the results have always been unsatisfactory. I have never obtained any fragment information of lactose aldehyde acid. Therefore, I ultimately did not perform methylation.

gyoung 2023-06-09

Still want to tell my friends in similar situations that I submitted on 6.7 with the editor and sent for external review on 6.8. I hope both myself and friends in similar situations have good results.

蛋蛋 2023-06-08

Do I need to urge for the resubmission of the revised draft for the second review that was submitted on the 4th of September and has been under review for almost two months?

蛋蛋 2023-06-08

The text "二审4.9号到现在都是under review" translates to "From 4.9 of the second review until now, it is still under review" in English.

Chao 2023-06-08

zzzzer, which direction are you in? Can we be friends and wait for the results together hhhh.

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started