阿珠 2021-02-05

Which enthusiastic buddy, can you please contact me privately to urgently consult a few issues regarding manuscript revisions? Please do not hesitate to advise me (411860185, QQ number). Thank you very much.

awsl007 2021-02-02

Submitted in October, it took 2 months to find a reviewer. In mid-January, the reviewer's comments were received, requiring major revisions. After making the revisions, it was accepted.

zang1967 2021-02-01

The impact factor is not useful, now we are expanding the publication.

zang1967 2021-02-01

It should have nothing to do with the author, it is possibly due to system reasons.

zang1967 2021-02-01

Wait patiently, currently it's common for external audits to take up to 4 months.

zang1967 2021-02-01

Just wait patiently. Currently, external audits for four months have become a routine.

zang1967 2021-02-01

Look at the account of the corresponding author.

caolu 2021-02-01

Excuse me, I am the first author. Why can't I find the status of my submission after external review? Was it rejected? Previously, when submitting a co-author paper, even if it was rejected, the first author could still check the submission status.

jakson 2021-01-29

It has been nearly 20 days, and I am still with the editor. I don't know why, but have any of you brothers or sisters encountered this situation again?

dafeng36 2021-01-28

Will the impact factor of this year drop? There are quite a lot of publications in 20 years.

caolu 2021-01-27

It has been one and a half months since I submitted it, but there is still no news of the external review comments. Does this mean it's not going well?

Dr.ZMom 2021-01-25

Gratitude! The editors and reviewers were very prompt in their handling:

Submitted for review within a week.
Received reviewer comments within a month, minor revisions.
After making the revisions, resubmitted and received acceptance within two weeks.
Approximately a week for the online publication.

All together, it took less than three months.
Thank you very much to the kind reviewers and efficient editors who helped two students graduate successfully.
Thank you, thank you.

生活应该如糖 2021-01-24

Magazines have developed rapidly in recent years, and the overall quality of articles has been continuously improving. Recently, there have been numerous submissions on the extraction, separation, purification, structural characterization, and activity of polysaccharides from plants. However, due to the lack of techniques such as GC-MS, the glycosidic bond connection mode could not be determined, resulting in direct rejection after a 10-day review process. When characterizing natural plant polysaccharides, it is necessary to determine the connection mode. Only fragmented novel points are provided, which feels insufficient. A comprehensive characterization is needed in terms of structure.

zang1967 2021-01-24

Okay, thank you. I have also been Under Review for 10 days, and there is no news at the moment.

caolu 2021-01-23

It has been 23 days under review, and I haven't received any review comments yet.

zang1967 2021-01-23

If there are any issues with the external audit, please inform me. Let's communicate and see how long it took.

jakson 2021-01-23

Has the editor finished? How long did it take?

梓阳 2021-01-17

The version submitted on December 31st was a revised version. The first review required major revisions within one month, which were then returned after a month's delay. The revised version was submitted two months later. The second review took one week and the reviewer believed that the revisions had been thoroughly made according to the feedback from the first review, so they agreed to publish it. The editor then gave acceptance.

It was not accepted so quickly as the first submission. Please take a look at the time of my initial submission and the review process.

caolu 2021-01-16

Is this the rhythm received directly?

梓阳 2021-01-15

Received on January 15th.

梓阳 2021-01-15

December 31st, modification submitted
January 1st, with editor
January 8th, under review
January 13th, review completed
Editor: Ian Sims

caolu 2021-01-12

I have been with my editor for over ten days. It was around New Year's Day and Christmas, so it might be a bit slow. After this period, it will be sent for review.

zang1967 2021-01-11

Hello, I think you may have misspoke. As far as I know, the Elsevier system displays "With Editor" during the submission process, and "Under review" indicates that the reviewers have agreed to review the manuscript.

zang1967 2021-01-11

Could you please let me know if there are any results? How long did it last with the editor?

zang1967 2021-01-11

How long have you been using with EDITOR?

zang1967 2021-01-11

Ask the experts, how long does it take for With Editor? It has already been ten days and it is still in this state.

企鹅号 2021-01-10

I calculated today and the exchange rate is 6.37, if I don't invest now, it will be too late. It should be around 6.5 this year. It is certain to break 7 next year. The quality of the articles is also getting higher, there is no problem entering the top three in the field of macromolecular materials.

梓阳 2021-01-08

2020.9.6 - Submitted to this journal
2020.9.10 - With editor
2020.9.13 - Under review
2020.9.23 - Under review again
2020.10.2 - Decision in process
2020.10.3 - Major revision to be submitted by November 3rd
Due to delayed email for supplementary testing, submission extended until December 31, 2020
2020.12.31 - Journal submission
2021.1.1 - With editor until now

梓阳 2021-01-08

The translation of the text is: "Transferred over, it has been a month since the external review, with two reviewers. The editor provided major revisions, and it has been 8 days since the modifications were submitted, but it is still in the 'with editor' status."

企鹅号 2021-01-07

As long as there is one rejection, the editor will reject it, and even with three major revisions, it may still be rejected.