氨基酸客户· 2021-03-15

What does "zengxx" mean?

阿珠 2021-03-12

3.6 proof - This means that there is a proof or evidence available.
3.8 corrections received - This indicates that corrections have been received or collected.
3.12 online - This suggests that something is available or accessible online.
5.15 publish - This means that something will be made public or released, possibly referring to a publication.

阿珠 2021-03-12

Some reviewers have already returned their comments. The editor is urging the completion of the review/reviews that have not been finished as soon as possible.

取个名字 2021-03-06

I appeared at 3.2.

氨基酸客户· 2021-03-05

Very fast, there is hope!

阿珠 2021-03-04

12.12 submission
12.16 with editor
12.21 under review
12.29 required reviews completed
1.1 required reviews completed
1.12 under review
1.22 required reviews completed
1.24 required reviews completed
1.24 major revision (for one month)
2.21 submission R1
2.22 with editor
2.23 under review
2.24 required reviews completed
2.28 required reviews completed
3.2 required reviews completed
3.4 accept

张小lemon 2021-03-04

Thank you, waiting for news, hoping for a good outcome.

梓阳 2021-03-04

The review is completed, the feedback has been given. Now I am editing here, waiting for the editor to make a decision. The external review feedback will be available in one or two days. Good luck!

梓阳 2021-03-04

Found the reviewer.

张小lemon 2021-03-04

March 3, 2021: Required Reviews Completed. May I ask what does this mean, my friends?

啊 2021-03-02

The following text translates to English as:

"The old editor from China, from Nanjing Agricultural, submitted an article last year. It was sent for review the next day, and after a month, received four major revisions. After careful editing and resubmission, it was rejected. The official reason was that it was not within the scope. The editor-in-chief asked for major revisions again, claiming that the literature was not found and the molecular weight could not be obtained. They suggested supplementing with experiments. After another month, the GPC results were returned, but it was placed under review for another month and then rejected. The old editor from China said it was not within the scope and there were no reviewer comments. They suspect it was not even sent for review. How can it be rejected twice for not being within the scope? This journal has been submitted to several times in the past and has had a few articles accepted, but this is the first time encountering such an unpleasant experience."

氨基酸客户· 2021-03-01

It doesn't matter, if it falls, it falls, break the fourth dimension.

企鹅号 2021-02-28

You got it wrong, brother. How could it possibly fall in the future? The impact factor of this journal has been steadily rising. Elsevier's manipulation of the IF, do you think they would let it fall if you wanted to? Publishing a large number of articles is to increase influence and further enhance citations. Just take a look at AMI and CEJ, and you will understand.

chen1965 2021-02-28

It has been two months and still no news. There is indeed a high probability of a big drop, so I suggest being cautious when investing.

panda guo 2021-02-27

The number of publications in 2020 is too high. Will it reach 6.7 this year? Will the impact factor for 2021 still increase or will it experience a significant decline?

只为你花开 2021-02-23

"一周送审" in English is "to submit for review within a week."
"2月14送审现在结果未知" in English is "Submitted for review on February 14, current outcome unknown."

张小lemon 2021-02-21

with editor 15 days later under review, hoping for a good outcome.

LD2021 2021-02-20

Are there many problems with the second major overhaul? Did the two major overhauls allow for minor repairs?

LD2021 2021-02-20

Are there many issues raised in the second major repair? After the second major repair, was there another minor repair?

caolu 2021-02-15

Submitted on December 21 with editor for 10 days. Under review for 30 days. One reviewer provided six comments, revised the following day. Accepted 10 days later.

张小lemon 2021-02-12

Is it 10 days in total from submission to rejection?

dddddog 2021-02-10

It is impossible to reach 7, at most 6.7. It's already February, and the impact factor hasn't increased much. Let's see if it can reach 7 next year.

zang1967 2021-02-09

In English, it means: "In other words, the journal is in the 'Under Review' status, which means the editor has only decided to submit it for review, but has not yet found the reviewers."

梓阳 2021-02-08

Are you having a fever or dreaming? It's broad daylight.

awsl007 2021-02-08

I worked as an editor for a week, and then my status changed to "under review". This status lasted for two months, and when I asked the editor, the response was that they hadn't found a reviewer yet. After another month, the review result came back, and it required major revisions. After completing the revisions in 7 days, it was accepted directly.

zang1967 2021-02-08

Don't worry, it's normal. Right now, it's just slow.

张小lemon 2021-02-07

It has been 11 days with the editor, may I ask my fellow buddies what is the situation? Thank you.

velfly 2021-02-07

The speed is fast, usually reviewed within 1 week, and there will be news within 4-8 weeks. The quality and quantity of the articles are pretty good. It has already reached 6.61, and I feel hopeful that it will exceed 7 this year.

zang1967 2021-02-07

It's hard to say. Just wait, usually around two weeks.

张小lemon 2021-02-06

Hello, I would like to ask how long does it generally take for a submission to be reviewed with an editor?