Verified Reviews - International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

fhxi0561 2023-07-20

2023.5.11, Submitted to Journal
2023.5.12, With Editor
2023.5.I don't remember, Under Review
2023.6.7, Required Reviews Completed
2023.6.9, Major Revision
The editor and three reviewers suggested language revisions, with three reviewers providing relatively simple comments that do not require additional experiments. One of the reviewers suggested that the paper be published after language revisions, which was very nice. The editor provided one month to make the necessary revisions and resubmit.
2023.7.7, Revision Submitted to Journal
2023.7.8, With Editor
2023.7.12, Under Review
2023.7.19, Completed - Accept
Waiting for the editor to send the proofreading draft...

zzzlll620 2023-07-19

Does the dip after one month of external review mean there is no hope?

科研小陈努力 2023-07-18

Why was my manuscript rejected after major revisions? This is so unfair.

zzzzer 2023-07-18

Why would it be rejected? What is the reason? Haven't we gone through several rounds of revisions?

Aerlizhu 2023-07-18

OP, have you submitted it for review now?

AlbertTJR 2023-07-17

Classmate, how many reviewers did you send for the first review?

zzzzer 2023-07-17

The first round of major revisions has been returned for two weeks now, and it is still in the "With Editor" status. Does it really take so long for the edited article to be processed for resubmission? Why hasn't it been sent for review yet?!

zzzzer 2023-07-13

There are too many people submitting articles to this magazine, so it is very slow. It has been 10 days since I submitted my revisions to the editor, but there has been no change.

Aerlizhu 2023-07-13

I also haven't received any news whether it has been sent for review or rejected. On June 11th, it was with the editor, and on June 15th, the status was updated, but it is still with the editor till now. Previously, when I submitted, I usually knew within a week whether it was rejected or sent for review. This time, the process is really slow.

我是涛哥哥 2023-07-11

I submitted an article in March, and it is still under review. I submitted another article in June, and it took 31 days to revise. So, everyone, don't bother checking anymore or looking for any review timelines. It all depends on luck and whether the reviewers are willing to help you review. All you can do is pray!

hhhhhh1 2023-07-11

It means that 05.22 is with the editor, and then after 05.29 it has been continuously with the editor.

qiang52399 2023-07-11

Is that DIP still eligible for review?

shenyang7788 2023-07-11

Currently, there is only one reviewer who has accepted the review invitation for "under review".

qiang52399 2023-07-11

The key is whether this DIP can be submitted for review. If it keeps dragging on like this, it will be very uncomfortable.

zzzzer 2023-07-11

Is it still with the editor today? Has the date changed?

hhhhhh1 2023-07-11

The article was submitted on May 20th, and there have been no changes since May 22nd/May 29th after being reviewed by the editor. It has been a while, and it doesn't quite align with the speed of processing for this journal. I also sent a reminder letter but haven't received any response. Has anyone experienced a similar situation?

zzzzer 2023-07-11

It's processed so quickly, the results were known the next day.

qiang52399 2023-07-11

Hello, may I ask if there is any hope for the submission to be reviewed on the second day? How is your current situation?

代臣 2023-07-11

Hello, I would like to ask who the reviewer is. It has been a month since I submitted it, but I haven't received any feedback from the reviewer yet.

zzzzer 2023-07-10

"A friend messaged you privately."

芒顿小镇 2023-07-10

I have already added you, can you please confirm?

芒顿小镇 2023-07-10

My "with editor" is 16 days.

zzzzer 2023-07-10

Oh my god, I'm also this editor. I am also a fan of multiples sugars. It seems like the editor is working, just that they handled yours and not mine. Let's add each other as friends and have a chat.

芒顿小镇 2023-07-10

This editor is quite efficient, faster than my previous article (not in this journal).

芒顿小镇 2023-07-10

Reply to zzzzer: My editor is Maria Michela Corsaro, a polysaccharide.

zzzzer 2023-07-10

Mangdun Town, who is your editor?

芒顿小镇 2023-07-10

Reply to [zzzzer]: Finally submitted for review, sent on the 8th.

zzzzer 2023-07-10

Have you submitted it for review? My returned work has been in the hands of the editor in Manton Town for a week, but there has been no response.

jasonleo 2023-07-10

I also only have one reviewer. It took a month to submit the article, and it took a month for the review to come back with major revisions. I was given a month to conduct additional experiments to address the 12 comments. I don't know if it will be accepted or not.

科研努力奋斗的小黄人 2023-07-09

When it came back under review, there was only one reviewer, suggesting major revisions and providing feedback as follows. But there is nothing? What does it mean? Does anyone know?

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started