小范paper 2022-05-07

Submitted on the first day of the Lunar New Year, reviewed after a few days.
Received feedback on February 24th, from three reviewers: major revision, rejection, and editor suggested major revision.
Revised and resubmitted on March 20th. The reviewer who initially rejected it requested additional experiments, but I stubbornly refused and provided a bunch of other references that I didn't do. It turned out that being stubborn was a big mistake, and I deeply regret it.
Resubmitted on March 24th, second review on April 6th. The first two reviewers accepted it, but the one who rejected it still refused, claiming that my revisions were very poor. This was because of the additional experiments, so the editor suggested major revision.
Finally, completed the experiments and revisions on April 26th, and resubmitted after a few days.
Completed the review on May 6th and it was accepted on the same day!
Overall, it was a quick process. If it weren't for my stubbornness, it probably would have been accepted in just over a month.

20220429 2022-05-07

Hello, how long have you been waiting for review?

mayday2137 2022-05-07

How long did it take to submit for review? It has been in the hands of the editor for a long time.

慢半拍518 2022-05-07

2022.1.28 submission;
4.4 major revision;
4.19 major revision feedback;
4.25 minor revision;
4.27 minor revision feedback;
4.28 minor revision again;
5.2 minor revision feedback;
5.6 accept

lingling188161 2022-05-06

How long has everyone been online after receiving it? Because facing graduation, I hope to be published as soon as possible.

daxudadada 2022-05-05

51388 divided by 6457 equals 7.958.

嘻嘻嘻嘻 2022-05-05

The real-time impact factor is 6.953.

daxudadada 2022-05-05

Real-time impact factor 7.958

mayday2137 2022-05-03

Breaking 8 is too exaggerated, right? How much is it in real-time?

Lily lucky 2022-05-03

Too fast, right? I also uploaded the revised draft on the 2nd, but there is still no response.

conghua 2022-05-03

May I ask how is the current situation? Mine is the same, I saw many comments online saying that it was directly rejected.

lingling188161 2022-05-03

3.28 submitted, on the same day with editor;
4.2 under review;
4.19 required reviews completed;
4.22 major revision with a total of two reviewers, one neutral and one positive, provided one month for revisions;
5.2 re-submit, on the same day with editor;
5.3 accepted.
I chose non-OA, and the processing speed was quite fast.

王小孩 2022-05-01

Submitted to acceptance was three months, with two reviewers. Overall, the speed was relatively fast. Hoping to achieve an impact factor of over 8 this year!

birddddd 2022-04-26

Try it out and you'll know if it's just empty talk. Don't talk big here.

嘻嘻嘻嘻 2022-04-23

Hello, I checked the status today and submitted it for review. Please wait a bit longer to see. I had to wait for over two weeks before submitting it for review.

蘑菇云 2022-04-23

I submitted my article on Apr 08. It changed to the "with editor" status on Apr 09, and has been in that status since Apr 14. May I ask what the current situation is now?

嘻嘻嘻嘻 2022-04-22

Guys, is this journal really slow? I chose a non-OA (Open Access) option and submitted it on 20220407, but it's still "with editor" until now, it has been more than two weeks... Does it mean it's been rejected?

mayday2137 2022-04-19

May I ask if this magazine requires an abstract image?

zl555 2022-04-18

I am the same, do you have any news?

中海-polymer 2022-04-18

What happened in the end? I woke up this morning and found myself in the same situation.

61你好 2022-04-17

Hello, I would like to ask about the current status of your article. Are you still looking for reviewers?

sdfmu zl 2022-04-16

Why haven't the papers for the year 2022 been indexed by WOS? Last month there were some, but this month there aren't any!

梅子2号 2022-03-31

I have been for more than a month.

GAO008 2022-03-31

20220119 submit
20220122 with editor
20220124 under review
20220216 major revise
20220314 re-submit
20220314 require reviews completed
20220320 under review

So slow after major revision.

blueblueder 2022-03-21

initial date submitted: 2021.12.27
with editor: 2021.12.27
under review: 2022.01.05
required reviews completed: 2022.02.04
major revision: 2022.02.14
date submission began: 2022.03.14
with editor: 2022.03.14
under review: 2022.03.18
required reviews completed: 2022.03.19
accept: 2022.03.20

Translation:
initial date submitted: 2021.12.27
with editor: 2021.12.27
under review: 2022.01.05
required reviews completed: 2022.02.04
major revision: 2022.02.14
date submission began: 2022.03.14
with editor: 2022.03.14
under review: 2022.03.18
required reviews completed: 2022.03.19
accept: 2022.03.20

Chen 2022-03-12

Provide initial review comments within a month, and directly hire after major revisions.

缘起168 2022-03-11

From submission to acceptance, it took 2.5 months, nice!

van 2022-03-10

This journal is indeed limited in terms of its level, but the requirements for entry are not very high. As for whether it involves spamming or whether there are connections, there is absolutely no evidence. After all, it is a Q1 journal, which is friendly for students studying in the field of biopolymers. I think overall, this journal may not have a high academic level, but there are no issues in other aspects.

我是涛哥哥 2022-02-27

Everyone go take a look at all of his comments, this person is a grudge!

ssfg 2022-02-18

May I ask how to determine if someone is a "guanxi" holder?