Verified Reviews - International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

zzzzer 2023-08-01

You are really fast in submitting for review. It only took 2 days for the submission. This is considered quite impressive in the field of polymer journals.

little_foo 2023-08-01

As the first article submitted collectively by co-authors and corresponding authors, we would like to share the progress of the submission as follows (updates on acceptance to be provided):

July 28, 2023: Submitted to journal
July 28, 2023: Under review by editor
July 29, 2023: Under review by editor
July 31, 2023: Under review (3 reviewers invited)

Peanuts 2023-07-31

2023.6.13 Submitted to Journal
2023.6.28 Under Review
2023.7.26 Required Reviews Completed
Quietly waiting

YZF430 2023-07-31

6.1 submit
6.2 with editor on Friday
6.5 with editor
6.6 under review
6.11 under review
6.18 Required Reviews Completed
7.2 major revision
7.10 resubmit
7.11 With Editor
7.15 under review
7.17 Required Reviews Completed
7.21 DIP (Decision in Process)
7.31 accept

alien振 2023-07-31

23.06.25 major revision
23.07.23 revised
23.07.27 major revision said the image resolution is low, revised on the same day
23.07.29 accepted

alien振 2023-07-31

I just received it yesterday, and it's already the proofreading draft.

flitg1650 2023-07-30

2023.7.25 Online

SunZero1 2023-07-30

I entered "decision in progress" directly after 16 days with the editor. Today is the second day of "decision in progress", and I don't know if it will be sent for review. Based on my previous experience with other journals, "decision in progress" after being with the editor usually means rejection. I don't know what this journal is like.

夜未染 2023-07-29

2023.7.24 submit
2023.7.25 with editor
2023.7.28 under review
The review process is quite fast, looking forward to a good outcome. Will update later depending on the situation.

我是涛哥哥 2023-07-29

Brother, trust me, don't worry, my 6-month-old repair was accepted directly!

我是涛哥哥 2023-07-29

The person who has been through this tells you that the editorial department asks you to change the format and then continue with the review. The comments are at the bottom of the email.

Liii- 2023-07-27

I am also in this situation. One day, the reviewer gave me major revision suggestions, but I can't find the suggestions. May I ask, what is your current situation, my classmate?

洋芋豆 2023-07-27

Reply to Wuyu: I haven't received it, at this stage, just wait, right?

无与 2023-07-27

Did you receive the tracking email?

无与 2023-07-27

Do you have trackable mail?

银色的雨 2023-07-25

The text "2023.7.21 Accept" is already in English.

小柚子呀 2023-07-25

It has been three months since the manuscript was reviewed, the date has been continuously updated, and no comments have been received.

洋芋豆 2023-07-24

6.28 Submission
6.29 With Editor
7.5 Under Review
Until now, under Review

.owo. 2023-07-24

2023.4.5 Submission
2023.4.5 with editor
2023.4.20 Under review
2023.4.21 Required reviews completed
2023.5.8 Major revision
2023.6.5 Revision submitted to journal
2023.6.6 With editor
2023.6.11 Required reviews completed
2023.6.19 Accept
2023.6.29 Article is online

zzzzer 2023-07-24

How do you appeal to the editor at IF100? Do you directly send an email to the editor's personal mailbox? How does the editor respond?

IF100 2023-07-24

The reason for rejection is also inexplicable. The reviewer should not have carefully read the article or might not be professional. I have already appealed to the editor and it has been re-evaluated after resubmission. However, five months have been wasted because of an unprofessional reviewer.

zzzzer 2023-07-23

My situation is similar to yours. On the day of returning for revision and submission, one reviewer immediately submitted comments, and they all said it might be an agreement to accept. The other reviewer, however, has not submitted any review comments yet, but he accepted the invitation to review. I don't know if the editor will continue to wait in this situation. If so, it would delay things too much.

大混子渣渣 2023-07-23

Reply to zzzzer, still continuously inviting reviewers... Basically inviting one every week, what's most frustrating is that each time only one is invited. I doubt if he is seriously looking for reviewers. At least 8 were invited, but not a single one accepted to review. What kind of luck is this...

大混子渣渣 2023-07-23

Hey guys, it's been 5 months. Haven't you reminded me about the manuscript? Is it because we've been missing an editor all along?

Drinkstea 2023-07-23

7.21 with editor

追魂柳叶刀 2023-07-23

Brother, it's only been a few days for you, but I have already been here for 5 months!

zzzzer 2023-07-22

How are you doing lately? Did you have it repaired and returned or did you accept it directly after the repair?

我是涛哥哥 2023-07-21

5.26 Submission
5.30 Update Request (UR)
6.26 Meeting Request (MR)
7.16 Review Submission (RS)
7.19 Approval Confirmation (AC)
7.21 Online

银色的雨 2023-07-20

Update
23.7.4 Minor Review
23.7.20 Revision Submitted to Journal

李瑞龙 2023-07-20

Hello, how did the article turn out after dip?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now