nini哈哈 2023-05-29

Does anyone know what research data.jsonnull means? Please ask me for it.

111fff 2023-05-29

Xiaoya, yes, still waiting. Did you receive any response for your CG submission?

雪樱子多糖的结构与功效 2023-05-28

The second reviewer directly expressed disagreement with my two statements: the relationship between structure and function, and the analysis of molecular weight. I explained in detail and made the necessary modifications as requested. In the end, the reviewer did not raise any further questions, indicating their agreement. During the entire external review process, only the editor raised a few questions regarding structural analysis and requested a TOCSY to be added. None of the five reviewers raised any concerns about structural analysis.

alien振 2023-05-28

23.01.28 Submitted
23.01.30 with editor
23.02.04 (can't remember) required review completed
23.02.04 under review
23.02.22 decision in progress
23.02.23 major revision (in a month) with 21 comments
23.03.22 revised
23.03.23 under review
23.05.27 major revision
I would like to ask for advice. After waiting for two months, I received feedback from only one reviewer. The editor did not wait for the opinion of the other reviewer (I asked the customer service of the publishing house to check). They decided on a major revision. However, the reviewer only mentioned one thing: low image resolution. I think this may be because the reviewer did not download the original image and only viewed the PDF. What should I do in this situation? Should I decline to revise? I have asked for advice through the submission system but have not received a response yet.

alien振 2023-05-28

2023.05.27 major revision

The editor responsible for the revision was very responsible. I waited for two months and received feedback from only one reviewer. I didn't wait for the other reviewer and directly received a major revision. However, this reviewer only mentioned that the image resolution was low. In reality, they only looked at the PDF and not the original image. Can it be considered as low resolution? So, what should I do? Should I refuse to revise or what should I do? I have already sent an email to the editor through the system but haven't received a response yet.

YXT-H 2023-05-27

2023.5.26 minor revision: Added a reviewer and provided 4 additional comments, conducted two more experiments... Had to add another reviewer for the first time experiencing a revision, really frustrating.

小雅小 2023-05-26

Are you still waiting? I have already applied for CG.

111fff 2023-05-26

It has been almost three months since it was under review. I wrote a letter to the editor half a month ago, but still haven't received a reply. It's driving me crazy. I'm anxious to graduate.

Accepted 2023-05-25

23.05.23 under review translates to "23rd May 2023 under review."

zzzzer 2023-05-25

What kind of questions did the second reviewer ask? Are you doing analysis of a polysaccharide structure and animal experimentation?

NianLi1997 2023-05-25

It has been two days, and there has been no movement at all.

junfeng 2023-05-25

How long is the review period? It's already been two months now.

雪樱子多糖的结构与功效 2023-05-25

2023.5.15 under review
2023.5.15 required reviews completed
2023.5.17 accepted Thankfully!

zzzzer 2023-05-25

There is only one reviewer, it is estimated that the editor is inviting new reviewers. Let's wait for the new reviewer's opinion.

junfeng 2023-05-25

Just one reviewer!

zzzzer 2023-05-25

Are you the only reviewer? If there's only one reviewer, the editor should wait for the new reviewer's opinion.

junfeng 2023-05-25

No,
The status is still "required reviews completed".
On May 15th, the required reviews were completed.
The date has now changed to May 18th, required reviews completed.
I am now wondering if it has been sent for review again.

junfeng 2023-05-25

No, the status is still "Required Reviews Completed". On May 15th, the required reviews were completed. The date changed to May 18th, and the required reviews were still completed. Now I am wondering if it has been submitted for review again.

zzzzer 2023-05-25

Nina, have you received your results yet? Have you accepted them?

NianLi1997 2023-05-25

Should send to the original reviewer, if luck is bad, will invite new reviewers again. Don't ask me how I know.

violets 2023-05-24

Who is the editor-in-chief?

不太会作图 2023-05-24

Luck is pretty good. Submitted at the end of March, the editor reviewed it for about a week, and then the reviewers took three weeks. They provided feedback at the end of April, and it was revised on May 11th. It was directly accepted on the 23rd. It is recommended that everyone contact the editor if they are confident, as having a sympathetic editor is really beneficial.

zzzzer 2023-05-23

May I ask, what aspect is this about? How many reviewers are there? Are there any additional experiments required?

沐雨澄风 2023-05-23

2023.03.22 Submitted to journal
2023.03.23 With Editor
2023.03.24 Under Review
2023.04.08 Required Reviews Completed
2023.04.29 Major Revision (in a month)
2023.05.15 Revision Submitted to journal
2023.05.15 With Editor
2023.05.23 Accept
A very good submission experience. I hope the journal continues to improve!

zzzzer 2023-05-23

The change in date usually means that the editor is inviting new reviewers. The date of the feedback remains the same when they come back.

新新 2023-05-23

Does the change in date mean that one of the reviewers' opinions has been revised?

新新 2023-05-23

How to know the opinions of the reviewers returned?

ZX1231 2023-05-23

23.1.24 submitted - Submitted on January 24th
23.2.4 with editor - With editor on February 4th
23.2.6 under review - Under review on February 6th
23.3.7 major revision - Major revision on March 7th
23.4.4 revision submitted - Revision submitted on April 4th
23.4.7 under review - Under review on April 7th
23.5.22 required review completed - Required review completed on May 22nd
23.5.23 accept - Accepted on May 23rd

NianLi1997 2023-05-22

It is possible to have one reviewer. In the first round of revisions, a new reviewer was not found. Then the reviewer from the first round provided minor revisions. Now, going back for review again, it should still be given to that person. They are really slow and it's annoying to have to send it for review again for just three small issues.

zzzzer 2023-05-22

The minor repairs were accepted as soon as they were returned for review.