媛子菌 2022-04-15

I didn't find a direct reply button under your comments about me. I hope you can see this. I'm not sure if your article covers multiple disciplines, making it difficult to find suitable reviewers, or if the reviewers are not efficient enough. But there may be news this month, so I suggest being patient for another 1-2 weeks. If no news is received this month, you can try sending a reminder letter.
The above is just a personal suggestion.

媛子菌 2022-04-15

Reply [Leather waste] did not find a direct reply button on this page, hope you can see it. I don't know if your article involves multiple disciplines, which may make it difficult to find suitable reviewers, or the reviewers' work efficiency is not high. But there may be news this month, it is recommended to wait patiently for 1-2 weeks. If no news is received this month, you can try sending a reminder letter.
The above is just a personal suggestion.

观天澜 2022-04-14

The general acceptance period for this journal is about 2-3 months, and there are many reasons for the slow process. The editors receive a large number of submissions, making it difficult to handle; the experts repeatedly reject the review requests, and the reviewers are also slow in completing the reviews.

皮革废料 2022-04-13

This journal is so slow.
Submitted on January 24th.
Still under review as of April 13th.
No news at all. Can you send an inquiry?

媛子菌 2022-04-12

Posted on 2022.02.05, sent for external review on 02.11, received external review results on 03.17 and started revisions (given 20 days for revisions, excluding experimental design and data, only including descriptive text and conclusion). Uploaded revised manuscript on 04.02 and officially accepted on 04.10.
In total, it took 2 months.
The editorial department has maintained a super-efficient workflow during the pandemic, which is really commendable. They have strict formatting requirements, so I suggest authors double-check the format before submission. My first submission was rejected due to formatting issues, but the editorial department provided a sample for revision, and after making the changes, I smoothly entered the external review stage. Three experts provided their opinions, but the first one only mentioned that the suggested changes were shown in the document. However, there were no downloadable files provided by the editorial department or the submission interface. However, considering the overlapping parts of the opinions of the other two reviewers, they might have raised common issues. The revisions only included modifications to the content and did not involve experimental design and data, making it relatively simple.

西西嘻嘻嘻aaa 2022-04-04

Hello, I would like to ask what was displayed on the webpage before the format change. Was it "decision in process"? I submitted my application last Friday, and on Saturday it showed "decision in process". Does this mean the editor has directly rejected my application? Thank you for your response.

lingling188161 2022-03-28

I don't know if the editor didn't like my article. It has been with the editor for one and a half months without being sent for external review. Because of graduation reasons, I am a little anxious and didn't continue to wait. Today, I withdrew the submission voluntarily. This journal is still good, and I hope everyone's articles can be accepted smoothly.

椰子气泡鱼 2022-03-25

12.13 Submission
12.15 Notification format has issues, text should be left-aligned! Charts should be placed at the end! (However, the author's guide says that text can be embedded...)
12.20 Resubmission
2.7 Major revision was given 20 days, 5 reviewers, 3 minor revisions. Some minor issues were raised, 2 rejections, 1 reviewer said it did not align with the journal's theme, introduced their own research content, found similar articles published in the journal on the website. 1 reviewer raised many questions that already had answers in the article, so had to reemphasize the answers. The editor kindly gave a major revision! Thank you! But unable to conduct experiments during the holidays, so applied for a one-month extension.
3.15 Submitted revised manuscript
3.24 Accepted

皮革废料 2022-03-21

Posted on the 24th, it has been two months and it is still under review.

科研不易不易不易不易 2022-03-17

Posted on February 23, the format was changed in the middle. It has been under review since March 3 or 4, until now.

lingling188161 2022-03-17

2.16 Submission, 2.18 with editor, it's already 3.17, almost a month and it's still with the editor. I don't know when it will be sent for external review.

孙 2022-03-11

The text has already been translated into English. Here is the translation:

Received 30 September 2021
Received in revised form 6 February 2022
Accepted 28 February 2022

扫地出门 2022-02-27

Ask the host for advice! The comment from the reviewer expert "Reviewer 2: Graphical Abstract-The images here and elsewhere seem to be of insufficient quality -" is referring to the images being somewhat blurry due to a lack of resolution, or is it suggesting that the content of the images is not good? I am confused and don't quite understand the reviewer's opinion. If it is referring to the resolution, can I solve it by directly uploading the original image?
Thank you, looking forward to the host's reply.

小愚 2022-02-12

July 11, 2021 - Submitted
October 1, 2021 - Rejected and resubmitted
October 20, 2021 - Returned
January 22, 2022 - Minor revisions
January 23, 2022 - Returned
January 25, 2022 - Accepted
The review process was long, but it was worth the wait.

科研路 2022-02-06

The review period is two and a half months.

科研路 2022-02-06

Submitted on October 10th, reviewed on October 13th, first review completed on December 28th. There were three reviewers, two minor revisions and one major revision. The feedback was constructive, and the editor requested a major revision for resubmission. It was returned for revision on January 20th, and the second review was received on January 30th, where one reviewer requested minor revisions for grammar and spelling issues. It was returned on February 4th, and accepted on February 5th. It is impressive to have such speed during the Chinese New Year period. Best wishes for continued success for the journal!

扫地出门 2022-01-22

Thank you for the host's sharing.

观天澜 2022-01-16

Brother Meng, the required reviews unexpectedly got complicated, is there such a good thing?

观天澜 2022-01-16

You are really brave. Are you daring enough to submit to this journal before graduation? It will ruin you!

观天澜 2022-01-16

How to describe this magazine? It still has some substance, but basically it's just Chinese people investing in it. Once you see who is in charge of the communication, it's clear that they have a direct influence. The whole academic community is like this.

科研路 2022-01-16

My article was sent for review after a few days, around three days. The review process took over two months with several changes in the dates. In total, the first review took three months with three reviewers.

xiyecc 2022-01-16

How long after submission will the review be arranged?

xiyecc 2022-01-16

May I ask, how long does it take to arrange for review? It has always been with the editor, and I'm getting a little anxious about graduation.

kkkf 2022-01-16

The Guide for Authors clearly states the refusal to accept any articles related to the field of food applications, yet it still accepted a paper completely unrelated to the scope of submission, such as "Effects of fructooligosaccharide and soybean protein isolate in the microencapsulation of walnut oil (2022)." The reason for this is unclear to me, so feel free to speculate. Regarding only this aspect, it is evident that the journal's editorial standard is high. It is also welcome for everyone to appreciate this outstanding article that breaks free from the framework of traditional journals, demonstrating great innovation and poetic qualities.

科研路 2022-01-16

Teacher, may I ask if "返修" is the same operation as "投稿"?

科研路 2022-01-16

Teacher, may I ask if the process for revising and resubmitting a manuscript is the same as submitting it initially?

Devin灬辉 2021-12-24

Just wait, I have been waiting for the editor's review for almost 20 days, and it has been almost three months since the external review, but there is still no response.

观天澜 2021-12-18

Brothers, my submission on December 18th, 2021 is finally under review. I first urged the editor of this journal, but they ignored me. Then I went to urge Elsevier Publishing, asking them to pressurize the editor, and finally there was some progress. Brothers, go and urge them quickly!!!!!

Also, the editor of this stupid journal. They said my highlights were too long, insisting on 85 characters (about one line) for each highlight. Can you believe that? I have seen papers published in this journal recently with highlights consisting of three lines. They waste time on trivial matters. I wish you get COVID-19 soon!

你这还不傻 2021-12-11

I am also this person! It has been more than a month!

你这还不傻 2021-12-06

I am so frustrated. Every time, editing only starts on the last day of the two-week period. I don't understand why they have to wait until the last minute. It's too slow.