SCIccc 2021-07-06

Hello, my status is also "rejected and resubmitted". After revising, it has been 17 days and the status is still "inviting reviewers". Is this normal? How long does this status usually last?

SCIccc 2021-07-06

Hello, my status is also rejected and resubmitted. May I ask if it is normal for the status to remain "inviting reviewers" for 17 days after revision? How long does it usually take?

SCIccc 2021-07-06

Hello, my status is also "rejected and resubmitted". May I ask if it is normal for the status to still be "inviting reviewers" after 17 days of revision? How long does it usually take?

SCIccc 2021-07-06

Hello, my status is also "rejected and resubmitted". After 17 days of revision, my status is still "inviting reviewers". Is this normal? How long does it usually take?

SCIccc 2021-07-06

Hello, my status is also rejected and resubmitted. After revising, it has been 17 days and the status is still inviting reviewers. Is this normal? How long does it usually take?

propura_yy 2021-06-30

The translation of "有大修的状态的" into English is "in a state of major repair."

risker 2021-06-15

Hello, may I ask if I need to submit a reply to the reviewer's comments when resubmitting a rejected manuscript? Also, should I indicate the revisions I have made in the article? Will the revised submission be reviewed by the original reviewer? Thank you!

risker 2021-06-15

Hello, I have also encountered reject & resubmit. I would like to ask, when resubmitting, do I need to submit a response to the reviewer's comments? And should I indicate the modifications made in the article? Is it the same reviewer who will review it after resubmission? I feel the editor did not clarify this. Thank you!

risker 2021-06-15

Hello, may I ask if it is necessary to submit a response to the reviewer's comments when resubmitting at the reject&resubmit stage? Also, do I need to indicate the modifications made in the article? Will the revised submission be reviewed by the original reviewer? Thank you!

risker 2021-06-15

Hello, may I ask if it is necessary to mark the modified areas in the article when resubmitting after rejection? And should a reply to the reviewer's comments be submitted as well? Thank you!

WWmint 2021-06-12

Hello, I also work in the field of diagnosis. Recently, I received a reject&resubmit decision after the first review, which means I need to make revisions before resubmitting. I would like to know if this is equivalent to major revisions and whether it is necessary to resubmit.

WWmint 2021-06-12

The reject&resubmit decision given after about two months in the first review is similar to a major revision. Does IEEE TII have a "major revision" status? What are the chances of acceptance if the paper is revised and resubmitted to the journal?

Johnxuxu 2021-06-11

Although there is a slow reviewer, the editor's handling speed is quite fast. The day before yesterday, it was "awaiting ae recommendation," but today the editor gave "reject and resubmit." I am ready to make some changes and resubmit...

lavita7777 2021-06-03

Ah, so slow... It has been two months since I submitted mine, and just the day before yesterday, the status suddenly changed from "awaiting review scores" back to "assign additional reviewers." It might take another five months. It's so annoying...

Johnxuxu 2021-06-03

Five months, still awaiting review scores...

lacuna 2021-05-09

Did you send the reminder letter?

lacuna 2021-05-09

May I ask if you have sent the reminder letter?

Johnxuxu 2021-05-07

Not yet... in a few days, it will be four months. Waiting.

modaoztc 2021-05-06

May I ask if you have received the result of your manuscript review? Mine has also been under review for 3 months and is currently still "Awaiting Review Scores".

大仙男 2021-04-26

Does the first draft not require a cover letter? I didn't see a place to upload it.

不懂吃的吃货 2021-04-23

May I ask what is the submission website for this journal? The link on Letpub cannot be opened.

小悟空 2021-04-14

Translated text: The submission was made on April 11th, and on April 12th, the status changed directly to "assigning reviewers." Does this status mean that it has been sent for external review? Or does it mean that it is still with the editor?

小悟空 2021-04-13

After the submission is assigned to the editing team, reviewers will be assigned. May I ask if this is the stage of sending it for review? Or is it an intermediate stage?

小悟空 2021-04-13

After the submission is assigned to the editor for distribution, is it sent for review? Or is it an intermediate state?

Johnxuxu 2021-04-13

It has been three months since the first trial, can we remind them?

ndter 2021-04-09

What is this state of "Waiting for Reviews"?

小小小飞机 2021-04-04

TII, including TIE, although both are double-blind, the problem is that the editor, associate editor, and editor-in-chief are aware of the author's information. How can we avoid relying on personal relationships to give a major acceptance to someone who should have been rejected if there are fellows, acquaintances, or colleagues involved? This double-blind loophole is too significant and should be addressed by encrypting emails. Prior to the initial review, the editor, associate editor, and editor-in-chief should also be unaware of the reviewer's information. Otherwise, there will be a significant disparity between the difficulty faced by ordinary individuals and that faced by the editor, associate editor, and editor-in-chief.

lyydamowang 2021-04-02

Hello, may I ask if TII is still accepting submissions or if it is double-blind?

Johnxuxu 2021-03-31

Has your status changed?

cys123456 2021-03-25

Similarly, leave a contact information and let's communicate!