mingyunjianshu 2022-05-02

Translation:
2019 Impact Factor: 9.34
2020 Impact Factor: 10.856
2021 Instant Impact Factor: 9.018
Completion Rate: 83.07%
The instant impact factor is slightly lower than the previous year, indicating that the review process may need to be expedited to maintain the impact factor.

mingyunjianshu 2022-04-26

Until now, it is still in peer review. It has been six months and it is indeed quite slow.

杭电小帅哥 2022-04-19

April 19th, still no response.

fanfan0000000 2022-04-15

Submitted on April 4th, and it is still Submitted.

杭电小帅哥 2022-04-09

3.21 Submission: ae: not assigned, Submitted

mingyunjianshu 2022-03-14

Submitted at the end of November last year, in peer review in early March 2022, with changes made to the formatting in between. Hoping for a good outcome.

IXC 2022-03-13

I received the proof in about 2 weeks, and then the early access was released in less than two weeks.

Geoffrey666 2022-02-26

Hello, how long will it take to receive the proof after submitting the final version?

Geoffrey666 2022-02-26

Hello, how long does it take to receive the corrected version after submitting the final version?

Geoffrey666 2022-02-21

2022.2.19 received

Geoffrey666 2022-02-21

2022.1.19 Received

IXC 2022-02-20

The review process is quite professional, focusing on comprehensiveness, logicality, and experimental richness, just like a traditional journal with strict standards. However, the handling of manuscripts is indeed slow. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in submissions and accepted papers. If you have innovative work that is not time-sensitive, you may have to wait in line, which may not be cost-effective for graduates. The variance in the quality of papers in the past two years has increased. It is understandable considering the popularity of AI. Most other journals are also facing the same situation.

IXC 2022-02-20

7.30 Submission: AE: Not Assigned, Submitted

8.8 Formal Review: AE: Not Assigned, In Peer Review

8.20 Formal Review Passed: AE: Not Assigned, Submitted

10.24 AE Assignment for Review: In Peer Review

12.2 Review Completed: Awaiting AE Decision

12.9 Major Revision (3 reviewers, all junior colleagues, 1 RQ, 2 AQ): Major Revision

12.16 Revised Version Submitted: In Peer Review

1.26 Acceptance: Accepted

The queue and formal review process took almost 3 months (a longstanding tradition in IEEE SPS journals, with a pre-review round before AE assignment). The formal review process took about a month and was not slow. The final version proof was submitted on 2.2, published on 2.11, and indexed in SCI on 2.16, which was quite fast.

Geoffrey666 2022-02-11

2021. 6. 6 Post
2021. 11. 9 First trial opinion, major revision (1aq, 2rq)
2021. 12. 18 Submitting first trial reply
2022. 2.3 Awaiting AE Decision

Geoffrey666 2022-02-11

How long does it usually take for an ae decision? It has been a week since my second appeal, and there is still no result.

Geoffrey666 2022-02-11

Your second review is awaiting AE decision, how fast! It's been a week already for my second review awaiting AE decision, and there is still no outcome.

孤独的feng 2022-02-04

2022.2.3 Accepted.

阳顶天 2022-02-01

If you don't hang up with the big shots, the allocation of tips to account executives will now take four months, which is unusually slow.

Charlie Yang 2022-01-23

Submitted on 20-Aug-2021, there was no status update afterwards. I waited for about 2 months and sent an email reminder. On 25-Oct-2021, an Associate Editor (AE) was assigned, and it has remained in peer review status until the end of January. Based on the experiences shared by others, it is estimated that the first round of reviews will be available around April. Looking forward to a positive outcome.

conquerboy 2022-01-06

The general review period for TIP is five months, and there is no need to rush it. Even if you send emails, no one will reply. There is nothing we can do, that's just how it is. TIP does not allow for a second major revision; the only option is to reject the submission and resubmit. Therefore, the first major revision is crucial. Make careful revisions and hope for the best. Some reviewers are not too strict with language and writing requirements, and minor revisions are usually enough for publication. However, with certain reviewers, another major revision may be necessary, resulting in rejection and resubmission. This can be troublesome as a new reviewer will be assigned for the second round, essentially starting the submission process again. It is best to provide a thorough response during the first round and pass the review in one go. If everything goes smoothly, it may take a little over half a year to be accepted; if not, it could take a little over a year.

hitzhangyu 2021-12-22

December 20, 2021, online.

YajieWang 2021-12-20

What field did the original poster apply for? I have also been waiting for almost a month and still have not been assigned an account executive.

Aliex 2021-12-19

Recently, the review speed of TIP has been unbelievably slow. It has been over a month since I submitted, and the Associate Editor (AE) has not even been assigned yet. Last time, it only took two weeks for an external review. The internal competition within TIP has become too intense recently, so I am planning to strategically withdraw and focus on the field of computer graphics.

hitzhangyu 2021-12-16

Posted in August 2020
First review comments in April 2021, revised in May
Second review comments and revision in October 2021
Third review comments and revision on November 10, 2021
Accepted on November 28, 2021

TIP reviewers are very serious, and compared to conferences, the level of reviewers is more guaranteed. The comments given are relatively more lenient compared to TPAMI, but TPAMI's comments are more constructive (based on my personal experience only). Apart from the slow review process, there are no major issues. If there is no rush, I recommend everyone to submit.

mingyunjianshu 2021-12-13

It has been 10 months, and I have invested one month, but it hasn't been reviewed yet...

ygjwd12345 2021-12-12

1. The text was submitted on February 15, 2021 and the decision was made on September 6, 2021, indicating that major revisions are required.
2. The text was submitted on October 22, 2021 and the decision was made on November 26, 2021, accepting it with mandatory minor revisions, particularly regarding English usage.
3. The text was submitted on December 10, 2021 and the decision was made on December 11, 2021, accepting it without the need for revisions.

mingyunjianshu 2021-12-10

Time seems really long. It looks like the investment I made last month will only yield results by this time next year.

孤独的feng 2021-12-07

2021.12.03 awaiting AE decision - Awaiting decision from the Associate Editor (AE).
2021.12.07 小修（1a, 2aq）- Minor revisions (1a, 2aq).

ygjwd12345 2021-11-25

Almost synchronized with your progress.

孤独的feng 2021-11-23

2020.11.03 submitted
2021.09.10 Major revision (1AQ, 2RQ)
2021.10.22 Revised
2021.11.23 in peer review

First time submitting a paper, it is the top journal in my research field, no doubt about it. However, the first review took more than 10 months, which was unexpected. Hopefully, everything will go smoothly from here.