JMCC 2022-06-15

This journal is no longer accepting submissions. It has been almost 2 months since I submitted my manuscript and I have not received any feedback. What's even worse is that it has been three weeks since the review comments were sent back to the editorial department and they still haven't made a decision. This journal has caused a lot of harm.

zhgong007 2022-06-01

The format does not meet the requirements, which is judged by general administrators, not the same person who decides whether the paper is suitable for editing. So, this is very normal.

Eternal 2022-05-12

08-Dec-投稿 translates to "08-Dec-Submission" in English.
21-Feb-2022-Major Revision /Reject and Resubmit translates to "21-Feb-2022-Major Revision /Reject and Resubmit" in English.
06-Mar-2022-resubmission translates to "06-Mar-2022-Resubmission" in English.
28-Apr-2022-Accept translates to "28-Apr-2022-Accept" in English.

六个核桃 2022-04-22

The comments from all three reviewers are quite objective. It seems that due to the pandemic, many major revisions of articles are being rejected and asked to be resubmitted.

六个核桃 2022-04-22

Submitted on 01.12; Revised/rejected and resubmitted on 03.04, given one year. Seriously revised for a month, added a lot of data, submitted revision suggestions on 04.02, accepted on 04.18.

世界的表象 2022-03-24

2021.10.10: Submission
2021.10.19: Editor informed that there are too many pages, need to reduce
2021.10.25: Submit again after reduction
2021.11.03: Informed that it does not fit their journal well, suggested submitting to other journals.
Delayed for almost a month and wasted time on unnecessary editing and reduction. If it doesn't fit your journal well, just reject it directly. Why make me reduce? Damn.

c——陈 2022-03-05

Could you please tell me if this journal has high requirements for innovation? Do you have any submission suggestions?

c——陈 2022-03-05

Excuse me, does this journal have high requirements for innovation? Do you have any submission suggestions?

拜拜拜仁 2022-02-18

The second review took 4 and a half months, and we are still directly accepting it. Everything is fine except for the fact that the review process is quite slow. In total, it took a whole 8 months.

XJTUWYH 2022-02-01

First trial in February, major renovation and reinvestment.
Second trial in February, major renovation and reinvestment.
Accepted two weeks after submission.

beiwei小陈 2022-01-12

Submitted on December 6th, feedback received on December 26th from two reviewers. The feedback was very kind, but it was challenging to limit it to 6 pages. It was painful to delete parts of the article and reduce the number of pictures. Accepted on January 6th, 2022. The submission process was very pleasant.

beiwei小陈 2022-01-12

Submit on December 6th, receive feedback on December 26th, two reviewers, their feedback is very friendly, just limited to 6 pages, it's painful to delete content and reduce images.

拜拜拜仁 2021-12-02

The first review took 8 weeks, with two reviewers suggesting major revisions. The second review has been ongoing for 9 weeks and is still in progress. Hopefully, there will be a favorable outcome.

dlaehd 2021-08-26

This is a highly regarded old publication in the industry. The first time I submitted, I received reviewer comments in about 14 days. The reviewer's comments were all positive, and the editor gave an "accept with minor revision" decision. After 6 days of revision, it was resubmitted, and the next day it was accepted.

The second time, I first submitted to EDL (Electronic Design Letters), and after about a month, the result came back. One reviewer unreasonably rejected it, but the opinions of the other reviewers were all positive. The editor asked for revisions, and it took a month to carefully revise and resubmit. However, the same reviewer unreasonably rejected it again, stating that the innovation was good but the EDL space was limited and suggested submitting to TED (Transactions on Electron Devices). This was truly unexpected. The other reviewers all recommended acceptance, but the editor rejected it and suggested transferring to TED. After transferring to TED, the opinions came back after a month. One reviewer suggested direct acceptance, while the others suggested minor revisions. The editor gave an "accept with mandatory revision" decision. After completing the revisions and resubmitting, the editor sent it for review on the third day and received it back in two days. After two days, it was accepted as it is.

Overall, the process was fast, and although the impact factor (IF) is not high, it is fortunate that the industry recognizes it.

xwei 2021-08-12

2021.08.08 Awaiting Decision Approval
2021.08.11 Accept As Is (11-Aug-2021)

Translation: The decision approval is pending as of August 8, 2021. It was accepted as it is on August 11, 2021.

Ablatxju 2021-08-08

Pure theory and simulation calculations should also be possible, preferably in combination with experiments.

xwei 2021-08-02

2021.07.07 Accept Conditionally with Mandatory Revisions (Expires on: 28-Jul-2021)
2021.07.27 revision submitted

xwei 2021-07-05

After the first submission, a major revision was made and resubmitted, which took one year... Two reviewers provided several thousand words of feedback.
Second submission (major revision):
2021.05.28 under review
2021.06.28 Awaiting ED Preliminary Decision
2021.07.05 Awaiting Decision Approval

啦啦啦云在哭泣呢 2021-06-18

Do I need to conduct experiments to submit to this journal?

Ablatxju 2021-05-24

Translated text: Transferred from EDL to TED on January 29, 2021.
Received feedback on March 3, 2021: Major revision/rejection/resubmission.
Resubmitted on March 24, 2021.
Made minor modifications on April 20, 2021.
Submitted on April 23, 2021.
Successfully accepted for publication on April 29, 2021.
Received proof on May 17, 2021.
Submitted on May 19, 2021.
Awaiting publication.

HJDMOS 2021-04-19

Waiting for a second trial.