letpubSCU123 2023-06-11

4 reviewers, all recommended revisions, no attacks on originality or innovation. Mainly technical and language issues.

The associate editor did not approve and did not give a chance to resubmit, now rejecting the submission.

letpubSCU123 2023-06-11

6.11 Awaiting Recommendation.

letpubSCU123 2023-06-11

Yes, it is possible that the insufficient number of reviewers has led to a lack of consensus in opinions. It has its ups and downs, and it feels uncomfortable.

Karen4543fdsv 2023-06-08

Does it continue with peer review after awaiting recommendation?

letpubSCU123 2023-06-08

2023.06.08 En revisión por pares

nwpu_qhd 2023-06-07

Excuse me, are the second reviewers still the same four people? Or are there additional reviewers?

flyingbird2022 2023-06-07

Submission cycle:
2022.07.18 First submission
2022.10.26 Feedback on the first round, rejection with the option to resubmit (based on opinions from 4 reviewers)
2023.02.05 Resubmission after revision
2023.06.06 Second rejection

flyingbird2022 2023-06-07

The quality is still very high, and the review requirements are also high. Previously, the review process was faster - feedback was received within 2 months. Now, due to the large number of submissions, it usually takes 3 months to receive feedback. If there are significant differences in opinions among the reviewers, one may have to wait for another reviewer's opinion. In conclusion, it is still worth submitting.

letpubSCU123 2023-06-07

2023.06.07 Awaiting Recommendation

ghbj 2023-06-07

What is your manuscript number? How long did the first review take?

符大豪 2023-06-05

2022/12/28 Submitted
2023/01/03 In Peer Review
2023/02/03 Reject
2023/03/21 Submitted
2023/03/29 In Peer Review
2023/04/19 Waiting Decision
2023/04/24 Minor
2023/05/08 Resubmitted
2023/05/09 In Peer Review
2023/05/12 Awaiting Recommendation
2023/05/15 Awaiting Decision
2023/05/17 Accept as Transactions Paper

Karen4543fdsv 2023-06-05

How long does it usually take for a recommendation? Is it generally a major revision or a straight rejection?

爱做梦的奋青 2023-06-03

2023.6.3 esperando decisión

2023.6.3 awaiting decision

ghbj 2023-06-03

Does anyone know how long it takes for this journal to go from peer review to the first decision?

XWZRBY 2023-06-02

It has been 18 days since submission, and it is still "submitted". Is this normal? I thought this journal had a fast processing speed.

爱做梦的奋青 2023-06-01

2023.6.1 is the date, and "awaiting recommendation" means that someone is waiting for a suggestion or advice.

zxs147 2023-06-01

The text is already in English. It states, "Now the author explicitly states on the website that once a submission is rejected, it cannot be resubmitted. So, reject but invite to submit should also not be resubmitted, right?"

Bin 2023-05-30

2023.05.26 In peer review, I don't know why it's a bit slow.

invincible123 2023-05-30

Give it a try, if AE didn't say no, you can try.

charlie1 2023-05-29

The submission cycle is approximately 12 months, with each round of review taking about 3 months. The statement above is incorrect.

charlie1 2023-05-29

The journal has a high quality, and the reviewers' suggestions are very valuable. The quality of the revised paper has improved significantly!
Through persistent efforts to make changes, it was finally successfully accepted!
Submitted in January 2022
Rejected in April 2022
Resubmitted in September 2022
Major revision in December 2022
Resubmitted in January 2023
Awaiting decision in May 2023
Accepted in May 2023

风之小翼 2023-05-29

The subject of the email is "decision to reject," but AE said to invite the author to resubmit after making revisions and to clearly explain the problems in the revised manuscript.

invincible123 2023-05-29

Does the email subject have "reject and invite to resubmit" in it?

ZKL123 2023-05-28

It took one year for the deputy editor to provide feedback and enter the "Awaiting decision" state on the same day. The editor made a decision within a week. The specific status changes are as follows:
02-06-2022: Submitted
23-07-2022: Major revision
02-08-2022: R1 submitted
12-01-2023: Minor revision
29-01-2023: R2 submitted
28-03-2023: Minor revision
03-04-2023: R3 submitted
28-05-2023: Accept

风之小翼 2023-05-28

The system gave a rejection, but the AE explicitly invited for a resubmission after making revisions according to the reviewers' comments. Is there still a chance in this situation?

Doresearch 2023-05-23

Waited for a month, gave major revision.

xhh 2023-05-22

The manuscript review is fast, submitted in October, and accepted in February.

Bin 2023-05-22

2023.05.06 submitted.

invincible123 2023-05-19

The relationship should not be significant, I suppose the editor must have been delayed by something, and if the time is too long, you can send an email to remind.

sujiayuan002 2023-05-18

Do you want to know what result was given after waiting for a month? Does the length of time have any relation to whether it was accepted or not?