Verified Reviews - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

paisson 2022-01-04

First trial awaiting decision, anxiously waiting...

jimtao1997 2021-12-11

Excuse me, has the final result been released now? My status changed from "Awaiting Decision" to "Awaiting Recommendation" nearly a month ago, and there is still no outcome. Does anyone know the reason for this? Should I send an email to inquire about the current status? Thank you, everyone!

wwwwh 2021-12-10

Hey guys, my status changed from "awaiting decision" to "awaiting approval". Does anyone have this status? What does it mean?

www122 2021-12-07

05-Aug-2021 Submit
09-Oct-2021 Major Revision
05-Nov-2021 Revision Submit
03-Dec-2021 Waiting Decision
06-Dec-2021 Accept

The initial review result will be provided within 5 weeks, regardless of whether it's the first or second review.
However, it has been challenging for friends around me to submit their papers because CSVT currently receives a massive number of submissions, resulting in a high rejection rate.
However, if the quality of the article is good, the process will go smoothly.

jaden 2021-12-05

Hello, have you ever changed from "awaiting recommendation" to "awaiting decision" before receiving a major revision?

wishacc 2021-11-17

Received an acceptance email, took 6 months! Good luck with your papers everyone~

jason2021 2021-11-17

"awaiting decision" indicates a favorable outcome; if it is the first review, the most likely result is major revision; if it is the second review, it is very likely to be minor revision or acceptance.

wishacc 2021-11-16

awaiting decision, very anxious.
Wishing the original poster good luck!

wishacc 2021-11-16

awaiting decision, good luck!

jimtao1997 2021-11-15

In the midst of awaiting a decision, I wish for the good luck of the OP ?

darkpromise 2021-11-01

7.23 Submission
9.12 Major renovation
10.12 Submit revised version
10.30 Acceptance

jason2021 2021-11-01

7.17, submitted;
7.20, In peer review;
8.30, Major Revision, two reviewers, the first with 8 questions, the second mainly discussed the algorithm, inclined to acceptance;
10.16, resubmitted;
10.25, awaiting recommendation;
10.26, awaiting decision;
10.30, accept;
Total of 100 days.

Dr.WW 2021-11-01

Have you all written a cover letter for your submissions?

jimtao1997 2021-10-28

Basking in the good luck of the host. ?

jimtao1997 2021-10-28

Same as the original poster, my current status is "Awaiting Recommendation." I am waiting for a good result! I hope the application will be approved!

conquerboy 2021-09-23

I submitted three times. The first time, I made major revisions and resubmitted. The second time, it was rejected (one acceptance, one minor revision, one major revision) because one reviewer had a new subjective misinterpretation, which led to a negative conclusion from the deputy editor. After an appeal, I resubmitted. The third time, the deputy editor said without any basis that there was no quantitative comparison done. The reviewer for the minor revision did not ask for a quantitative comparison either, and there were no relevant quantitative indicators to refer to. The deputy editor cannot provide objective feedback on the reviewer's suggestions. Each time, the deputy editor always adds their own opinions to the review comments, so the attitude of the deputy editor of this journal is crucial. This is just my personal opinion, for reference only.

毕业不差论文 2021-09-15

2021.9.13 awaiting decision
2021.9.15 accept
This journal is quite fast, with each review cycle taking no more than two months.

毕业不差论文 2021-09-15

2021.9.13 Awaiting decision
2021.9.15 Accept

Translated:

2021.9.13 Awaiting decision
2021.9.15 Accept

毕业不差论文 2021-09-07

2021.9.2 Awaiting Recommendation
No news yet, it's so agonizing~

毕业不差论文 2021-08-30

2021.1.15 submit
2021.3.12 reject but invite resubmit
2021.6.20 resubmit
2021.8.1 Minor Revision
2021.8.17 a revision has been submitted
2021.8.30 still in peer review

I heard an associate editor say that it will take more than ten issues for the previously accepted articles to be published in this journal. The editor-in-chief repeatedly emphasized the need for stricter standards during the meeting, so it will probably become increasingly difficult to get published in this journal in the future. Sigh, I don't know if I'll be able to get accepted or not. I'm simultaneously applying for jobs while waiting for the outcome of this article. If it gets accepted, I also plan to use it for my PhD application.

Burning6 2021-08-14

2021.02.26 Submitted
2021.03.02 in peer review
2021.05.20 Awaiting Recommendation
2021.06.05 received a Major Revision
2021.07.10 Submit the major revision/in peer review
2021.07.24 Awaiting Recommendation
2021.07.31 Awaiting decision
2021.08.02 received a Minor Revision
2021.08.07 Submit the Minor revision/in peer review
2021.08.08 Awaiting decision
2021.08.09 Accept
2021.08.13 Proof
2021.08.13 Published to IEEE online

Translated:

2021.02.26 Submitted
2021.03.02 in peer review
2021.05.20 Awaiting Recommendation
2021.06.05 received a Major Revision
2021.07.10 Submit the major revision/in peer review
2021.07.24 Awaiting Recommendation
2021.07.31 Awaiting decision
2021.08.02 received a Minor Revision
2021.08.07 Submit the Minor revision/in peer review
2021.08.08 Awaiting decision
2021.08.09 Accept
2021.08.13 Proof
2021.08.13 Published to IEEE online

jason2021 2021-07-21

May I ask if TCSVT requires author bios for initial submission? I submitted my initial draft without author bios, which is 14 pages long, and it failed three times due to overlength. I'm not sure why this happened.

jimtao1997 2021-06-08

I hope the same good luck as the original poster.

酒气灵 2021-05-29

2020-10-29 Submit first draft
2021-03-06 Receive major revision comments
2021-04-06 Revise and resubmit
2021-05-28 Accept

The article is about artificial intelligence and computer vision. TCSVT is a top journal in the field of computer multimedia. The entire review process took 7 months, with the first review taking 4 months, one month for revisions, and the second review taking 2 months. The editors and reviewers were very professional and efficient, and we are happy to share the good news of acceptance with everyone!

论文君 2021-05-22

I submitted the first draft on March 8th, and until now, there have been 76 days without any results!

52zty 2021-04-10

After I returned, it took about a week for me to receive awaiting recommendation status. However, it has now changed to in peer review again. Did the new reviewer you found not provide any new feedback? In this journal, I encounter new reviewers in each round, and each person has a different perspective on the issues, making it feel endless.

小屁孩 2021-03-31

Hello, may I ask if your Response to reviewers, after being rejected, was a separate file or placed below the Cover letter?

touch 2021-03-30

Overall, the speed of the review is acceptable. Submitted on August 29, 2019, rejected after the first review on November 25, 2019. Three reviewers provided several modification suggestions, all of which were very professional. Resubmitted on January 13, 2020, major revisions made on March 17, 2020, resubmitted on April 5, 2020. Rejected with an invitation to resubmit on May 12, 2020. Resubmitted on May 29, 2020, accepted on July 11, 2020.

飞天镜 2021-03-22

Are you all Ph.D. holders? I have read the author profiles of several accepted papers, and they all started with a Ph.D. Will a master's student be rejected because their academic qualification is considered too low?

画渡 2021-03-16

2020-10-14 Submission
2020-11-27 Rejected and resubmitted, with over 30 comments provided by four reviewers, and a one-year revision period given
2021-1-28 Resubmission
2021-3-3 Minor revisions
2021-3-8 Accepted
The editorial process of TCSVT is very fast, usually taking only one or two days, and the review cycle is also fast.

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started