Verified Reviews - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

xiaotongtong923 2022-08-06

On the 8th of February, in peer review.

算哪个小饼干 2022-08-06

Just sent it out, no news yet.

算哪个小饼干 2022-08-06

Just sent it out, no news yet.

YG_king 2022-08-05

May I ask if there are any results now?

爱做梦的奋青 2022-08-05

2022.08.02, Submitted.

banxia1995 2022-08-03

The text "2022.7.29 submitted" is already in English.

spring 2022-08-01

Review process:
submitted
in peer review
waiting accommodation
in peer review
What does it mean?

xiaotongtong923 2022-07-31

Posted on July 27, 2022, not yet allocated.

xxyh 2022-07-30

Hello, two days after submission, it has been in the peer review process. How long does this state usually last?

哈哈哈呼呼呼 2022-07-27

Hello, OP. When you resubmit after a rejection, do you write your responses to the reviewers' comments in the cover letter or in a separate document?

xxyh 2022-07-25

Just now, I made a mistake. It should be the review and proofreading by the editor and reviewers all in this state.

xxyh 2022-07-24

In peer review, it is equivalent to internal review by editors, not submission for review.

MichaelCV 2022-07-23

Does "in peer review" mean it has already been submitted for review?

MichaelCV 2022-07-23

May I ask if "in peer review" means that it has already been submitted for review?

xxyh 2022-07-19

2022.7.14 In Peer Review

Jay 2022-07-15

2022-07-14 Accept

xxyh 2022-07-14

2022.7.12 Submitted: ADM: Noel, Desiree

This text does not require translation as it is already in English.

Jay 2022-07-12

2022-04-02 submitted
2022-04-08 in peer review
2022-05-17 awaiting decision
2022-05-19 major revision
2022-06-20 resubmitted & in peer review
2022-07-05 still in peer review
2022-07-11 awaiting decision

Translation:
2022-04-02: Submitted
2022-04-08: In peer review
2022-05-17: Awaiting decision
2022-05-19: Major revision
2022-06-20: Resubmitted & in peer review
2022-07-05: Still in peer review
2022-07-11: Awaiting decision

zpai 2022-07-08

Why are you all so fast... I envy you.

Jay 2022-07-05

2022-04-02 submitted
2022-04-08 in peer review
2022-05-17 awaiting decision
2022-05-19 major revision
2022-06-20 resubmitted & in peer review
2022-07-05 still in peer review

Translation:
2022-04-02: Submitted
2022-04-08: In peer review
2022-05-17: Awaiting decision
2022-05-19: Major revision
2022-06-20: Resubmitted and in peer review
2022-07-05: Still in peer review

Tesan-CN 2022-07-04

Replying to the comment above, the first mention of the paper not being appropriate refers to my citation error. I mistakenly cited an article that has low relevance to the content of this paper.

算哪个小饼干 2022-07-03

Hello friends, do we need to pay for page charges for TCSVT journal? How many pages can we have without paying page charges?

昶暟 2022-06-30

After seeing the enthusiasm of the original poster, I feel motivated again.

V. J. Li 2022-06-30

Is the timeline self-written? "still in peer-review", seems like it's self-written...

V. J. Li 2022-06-30

Is the timeline self-recorded or can it be checked within the submission system? I couldn't find it.

么禾 2022-06-27

Can the original poster please add me on QQ with the ID 1269404061 so that I can ask a question about submission?

Dr.WW 2022-06-13

After submitting the major revision, this situation occurred, and the feedback given was for minor revisions.
Possible reasons: Some of the reviewers' comments have returned, reaching the minimum required number of reviewer comments. For example, if 4 comments were expected and 3 have been received, the status would change to "Awaiting Recommendation." Currently, the Associate Editor has adjusted it back and is waiting for the remaining reviewer comments.

风之小翼 2022-06-13

Hello, may I ask what is the situation? Is there any result now?

奥特曼打怪 2022-06-13

Hello, may I ask if the first citation was rejected because the reviewers said that the most relevant articles from their journal were not cited and there was no comparison made?

Tesan-CN 2022-06-06

2021.09.24 Submission
2021.09.27 Immediate Reject due to inconsistent citation with journal content
2021.10.08 Resubmitted after addressing citation issues
2022.01.19 Reject due to insufficient experimental content and lack of detailed theoretical explanation
2022.02.03 After making revisions based on reviewer comments, I feel that my article shouldn't be doomed, as the issue is not a theoretical flaw or lack of innovation. I am determined to resubmit.
2022.04.15 Major Revision - Happy to see that one reviewer has accepted the paper, while the other has raised questions about some textual descriptions and suggested additional dilution experiments.
2022.05.05 Submitted revised manuscript, praying for no complications.
2022.06.05 Accept as Transaction Paper - Overjoyed.

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started