铁柱 2023-03-18

Hello blogger, I noticed that you have published articles in IEEE TAES. I would like to inquire about how you format a single-column layout for IEEE TAES. I have searched for relevant information online, but because the IEEE TAES template in LaTeX is different from other IEEE TRANS templates (the header for IEEE TAES LaTeX template is \documentclass{IEEEtaes}, while other IEEE TRANS templates use \documentclass{IEEEtran}), the online methods are not effective. Could you please provide some guidance?

Anthony_hit 2023-03-18

There has been no news for two months after the second trial...

港岛哥哥 2023-03-16

Posted on December 5, 2022, and still awaiting reviewer resources until March 16, 2023. Why is it taking so long? Does anyone know what's going on? The article submitted is about aerial collaborative transportation.

Rukiki 2023-03-16

2023 0308 Acceptance, celebration! Overall, except for a slight delay in the second review decision due to the pandemic, everything else was very fast.

初九 2023-03-15

2023-03-10 submitted
2023-03-13 Awaiting SE Assignment
2023-03-15 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment

Translation:
2023-03-10 submitted
2023-03-13 Awaiting SE Assignment
2023-03-15 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment

wddy 2023-03-11

May I ask if your second "awaiting ae recommendation" status has been going on for almost two months?

wddy 2023-03-11

Have you ever experienced returning to "awaiting reviewer scores" after "awaiting ae recommendation"? Does it mean there were significant disagreements among the reviewers and it was resubmitted for review?

yayayayaya 2023-03-11

2023.03.11 Awaiting AE Recommendation

In English, the above text translates to:
2023.03.11 Awaiting AE Recommendation

der_kokon 2023-02-11

On New Year's Eve, I received a notification and went through major repairs, minor repairs, and acceptance.

der_kokon 2023-02-11

Top journals in the aerospace field, which have been consistently recognized by peers, require not only theoretical innovation but also practical engineering application value. They pay great attention to the details of application. Two years ago, a paper went through four reviewers: three major revisions and one rejection. After the revisions were made and resubmitted, the three reviewers agreed to accept it, while the reviewer who initially rejected it continued to provide baseless and arbitrary comments. Their comments were completely contrary to the other three reviewers' agreement, raising suspicions of malicious review. They did not provide any substantial suggestions or reasons for the paper's rejection, only stating that the paper was not acceptable. It took a year and a half, and the editor ultimately rejected the paper, causing great anger. Last year, a good piece of work was submitted here and it took a year to be accepted.

yayayayaya 2023-01-30

2023.01.30 Awaiting Reviewer Scores.

Rukiki 2023-01-28

Thesis on spacecraft attitude control
Submitted on June 28, 2022
First review returned on September 16, 2022, major revisions required
Revised manuscript submitted on October 6, 2022
Awaiting recommendation from associate editor on November 27, 2022
Decision received from associate editor on January 21, 2023, one reviewer accepted the paper, and another reviewer raised a minor issue
Revised manuscript submitted on January 25, 2023
Accepted on March 8, 2023.

yayayayaya 2023-01-25

2023.1.23 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment

This text is already in English. It means that on January 23rd, 2023, the task or document is waiting to be assigned to a reviewer.

yayayayaya 2023-01-15

2023.01.15 Awaiting Reviewer Selection

This phrase is already in English and does not need to be translated. It means that a task or document is currently waiting for the selection of a reviewer.

yayayayaya 2023-01-14

2023.01.13 Submission
2023.01.13 Awaiting SE Assignment
2023.01.14 Awaiting AE Assignment

yayayayaya 2023-01-13

2023.01.23 Submission
2023.01.23 Awaiting SE Assignment
Hoping to be accepted in the end!

小法法 2023-01-07

Submitted in July 2022
Received results in mid-September: Major revisions
Submitted revised draft in early November
Received results at the end of December: Minor revisions
Submitted revised draft the next day
Accepted in early January
The speed is actually quite good, but the second review process takes a bit longer than regular journals. The editors give the reviewers about two months' time.

Christina2021 2022-12-09

I would like to ask, if it's not an OA (open access), does it mean that there is no layout fee for less than 10 pages, but a layout fee of $200 per page for pages exceeding 10?

donaldddfsdfs 2022-12-08

The reviewer is very professional, asking direct and crucial questions. They discuss even minor issues repeatedly, not suitable for superficial papers. They truly deserve to be the top in the industry.

zarathustr 2022-11-23

However, objectively speaking, TAEs is no longer a top journal. In the past, it took at least half a year for the old review system, often encountering delays of up to a year. Now, with the change of editor and the introduction of a new review system, some results can be obtained within a month. There is a difference in the quality of articles compared to before.

zarathustr 2022-11-23

Yes, jgcd has posted before in 2018. I was looking for a NASA reviewer. The recognition within the community is much greater than that of taes.

Zerob 2022-11-12

From a personal perspective, in terms of dynamics control, the TAES article is not as innovative as the JGDC. Relatively speaking, it is also more difficult to publish in JGDC. However, TAES still holds a very stable position as one of the top two journals.

独上西楼 2022-10-29

Submitted in March, underwent two revisions, accepted at the end of October, the review speed is relatively slow.
AE is a fellow, and according to him, the other three reviewers he found are also fellows, who are serious, responsible, and professional.
It is the best journal in the industry, especially in the engineering field (without a doubt), not the preferred journal for those who want to publish low-quality articles.
For students who want to publish low-quality articles, GRS and RS may be more suitable.

求毕业啊啊啊 2022-09-20

Will the reviewer be changed after major revisions?

zheng2021 2022-09-19

Posted on January 12, 2022
Received the first review on April 29, 2022
Received the second review on July 25, 2022
Accepted on August 31, 2022
Paid great attention to the experimental implementation part, and the reviewer's comments were very insightful. After making the revisions, there was significant improvement.

Ryan 2022-08-20

21.12.28 submitted
22.03.26 awaiting AE recommendation
22.04.17 major revision
22.05.29 submitted after major revision
22.06.02 awaiting reviewer scores
22.07.20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision
22.07.28 submitted after minor revision
22.08.01 awaiting reviewer invitation
22.08.05 awaiting reviewer assignment
22.08.06 awaiting reviewer scores
......

Translation:

21.12.28 submitted
22.03.26 awaiting AE recommendation
22.04.17 major revision
22.05.29 submitted after major revision
22.06.02 awaiting reviewer scores
22.07.20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision
22.07.28 submitted after minor revision
22.08.01 awaiting reviewer invitation
22.08.05 awaiting reviewer assignment
22.08.06 awaiting reviewer scores
......

ieg_ 2022-08-05

2022.03.30 submitted
2022.04.14 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.05.30 major revision
2022.07.12 submitted after major revision
2022.07.18 awaiting reviewer scores

Translated:
2022.03.30 - Submitted
2022.04.14 - Awaiting reviewer scores
2022.05.30 - Major revision
2022.07.12 - Submitted after major revision
2022.07.18 - Awaiting reviewer scores

shuo 2022-06-27

November 15, 2021 - Submitted
March 10, 2022 - Awaiting AE recommendation
April 4, 2022 - Major revision
May 4, 2022 - Resubmitted
May 11, 2022 - Awaiting reviewers' scores
June 25, 2022 - Awaiting AE recommendation
June 26, 2022 - Awaiting EIC decision
On the same day, Accepted

The Editor-in-Chief and Deputy Editor are very dedicated, they even check emails on weekends.
Initially, three reviewers were assigned to review my paper, which took almost five months. Some were diligent while others were not. One of the reviewers was very professional and gave detailed suggestions, greatly improving the content of the paper.

shuo 2022-06-27

The journal is a good journal and also a top journal in the field of radar signal processing. The reviewers and associate editors are very professional and strict. It pays special attention to innovation and has a significant influence, so it is not suitable for mediocre papers. The review process is very long and it is a great test of psychological resilience.

Kevin 2022-06-16

At 6:16 in the morning, at four and a half, I have been hired, very happy! Thank you for the blessings from the seniors.