Verified Reviews - IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

梦想成真 2021-07-12

May I ask how long is the review process for you? It has been one month and one week for mine, and there is still no news. I feel like it's not going well, as it seems many others receive news within one month.

BIG_BOWEN 2021-07-12

Already awaiting a decision, looking forward to good luck coming.

涵哥 2021-07-06

Let's all come together to share and discuss the submission status of IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL.

lst2333 2021-07-06

Just asking my brothers who have submitted before, is it necessary to include the images in the abstract of this journal?

mofeng侠 2021-07-06

Generally, besides the manuscript and cover letter, what other materials are required to be uploaded for this submission?

柳暗花明lkc 2021-07-05

The basic process and timeline mentioned by Xiaollllll are the same. Thank you all for your guidance. The payment for the paper will be sent to the corresponding author via email, which will contain a link. The fee varies based on the number of pages submitted beyond a certain limit.

15735658814@163.com 2021-07-03

Have your questions been resolved? I would also like to know.

15735658814@163.com 2021-07-03

2021.03.11 submitted
2021.03.11 under view
2021.04.02 awaiting decision
2021.04.11 reject revise and resubmit
2021.05.02 resubmitted
2021.06.05 awaiting decision
2021.06.16 minor revision
2021.06.18 resubmitted
2021.06.18 awaiting decision
2021.06.21 accept

First submission, the process was quite fast. Thank you to the reviewers and editors. Wishing for continuous improvement.

stud_chen 2021-07-03

A cover letter is still necessary, just change the previous number and there is no need to rewrite it.

雷声 2021-07-02

Do I need to write another submission letter when resubmitting after making modifications?

stud_chen 2021-06-23

24-Feb: submit
19-Apr: Minor revision
09-May: resubmit
22-May: Minor revision
07-Jun: resubmit
17-Jun: Minor revision
23-Jun(19:44): resubmit
23-Jun(20:05): accept
It's absurd, three minor revisions, I'm disgusted (the second time because I didn't fully respond to a reviewer's comment, the third time was due to formatting changes suggested by the editor)
I've always been reading others' comments, and finally it's my turn.

泡菜坛子詹姆丝 2021-06-23

I would like to ask how to fill in the reviewers.

青瓜 2021-06-23

Hello, may I ask how long it took for your submission to be accepted? Can you provide some specific time points?

MayFly 2021-06-22

Okay, thank you!

Ruazi 2021-06-22

In my article, there is only a gap of 2 and a half days. To be honest, I am a little surprised. Most of the previous comments suggested a gap of 7 to 8 days.

MayFly 2021-06-22

How long did it take for you to receive notification of the review decision from "awaiting decision"? Thank you.

Ruazi 2021-06-22

Oh, so according to this, does "SOA is insufficient" mean that I haven't referenced the latest articles, or that the referenced latest articles aren't enough?

^冬日暖阳^ 2021-06-22

Is it state-of-the-art?

Ruazi 2021-06-22

First submission, may I ask what is SOA? There is a comment in the review saying "SOA is insufficient" and suggesting to revise and resubmit, but I am not quite clear about the meaning of this comment. I hope the experts can kindly enlighten me!

stud_chen 2021-06-21

Hello, may I ask if this journal has any requirements regarding plagiarism rates?

stud_chen 2021-06-20

Search for the IEEE Template Selector, basically all IEEE templates can be found there.

stud_chen 2021-06-20

I submitted it on February 24th. It has always been minor revisions, and with the minor revision suggestions given in the last edit, it has been three times now.

哈哈12312s 2021-06-19

This journal is very fast, highly recommended.

stud_chen 2021-06-18

Because the editor needs to avoid the situation where both reviewers are people you know.

Windy 2021-06-18

Can it still be like this? Is the editor dissatisfied?

stud_chen 2021-06-18

Because the modifications made by these two people were relatively minor, the manuscript was resubmitted to a third person for review. That's how it is for mine.

Windy 2021-06-17

Have you all encountered this situation?

Windy 2021-06-17

After submission, it quickly became "under review"; after three weeks, it became "awaiting decision." This status lasted for about eight or nine days and then changed back to "under review." Did the reviewers have conflicting opinions and new reviewers were added?

xiaollllll 2021-06-07

Generally, after this type of journal is approved, authorgateway will send an email to the corresponding author for proofreading. Then, it will be visible on early access in about two to three days. After that, payment will be made. It takes about one to two weeks for "With Author for review and commentary" stage. Finally, please be careful not to misspell the co-author's name.

青瓜 2021-06-06

I submitted my work earlier than you, and now it's only undergoing major revisions...

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started