forsensor 2022-03-18

2021-12-20 Submission Under Review
2022-2-18 Sent an email to urge the editor
2022-2-20 The editor replied and there are still pending reviewer comments
2022-3-18 Still no news, still Under Review

I've seen many comments saying that the first review takes about a month and a half, but it has been three months for me. I've even sent a reminder and still have not received any news. Why is that? Can someone knowledgeable please explain?

witcher005 2022-03-17

The first trial is approximately one and a half months.

witcher005 2022-03-17

May I ask if the journal "Sensors Journal" will still send papers for external review during the minor revisions? If external review is still required, will there be additional reviewers added?

be your personal best 2022-03-15

May I ask: how long did it take from submission to receiving the first review comments?

witcher005 2022-03-14

Why is the ad time for this journal so long? The first time I submitted an article, it took one week for the initial review feedback to come back with ad comments. Then I requested arbitration and a re-review, but now it has been another week since I resubmitted the revised version and there is still no news.

bigbigpang 2022-03-07

Give up, if you say so, I might also be rejected, the direction of big data.

bigbigpang 2022-03-07

Submitted a review of big data, haha!

Ray 2022-03-07

2021.07.15 - Submitted
2021.10.30 - First minor revision
2021.11.11 - Minor revision returned
2022.02.09 - Second minor revision
2022.02.23 - Minor revision returned
2022.03.04 - Accepted

It took seven and a half months.
There were three reviewers who provided professional comments and were able to grasp the key points in the article. However, the speed of the review process depended on luck. The editor was very responsible and followed up midway. The editor was also very patient. I wish the journal continued to improve.

我要成为大娱乐家 2022-03-07

2021/12/10 - submit
2022/01/20 - reject and resubmit, one reviewer accepted and one required major revisions
2022/02/15 - resubmit
Until now, the second review is still under review, it has been more than 20 days.

起个网名想破脑袋 2022-03-04

Is the second review speed of this journal still so slow?

sushi1220 2022-03-03

2021/10/7 - Submit
2021/11/10 - Awaiting decision
2021/12/20 - Reject and resubmit, with two reviewers suggesting minor and major revisions respectively, with the major revision reviewer only mentioning simple issues like formatting.
2022/1/19 - Resubmit
The second review is still under review, it has been over 40 days.
On February 18th, I contacted the ADM (Assistant Director of Manuscripts) who replied saying they have received responses from the reviewers and are waiting for other reviewers' opinions.
On March 2nd, I directly emailed the first review editor but have not received a reply yet.
I have had enough unfortunate experiences, I hope for good luck and a faster acceptance so that I can graduate normally.

STommy 2022-02-28

11-Aug-2021 Submitted
13-Sep-2021 Reject and resubmit (3 reviewers, 2 minor revisions, 1 reject with review)
21-Oct-2021 Resubmit
19-Nov-2021 Reject and resubmit (2 reviewers, 1 Accept, the reviewer who rejected in the first round uploaded the wrong comment)
25-Nov-2021 Resubmit
29-Dec-2021 Reject and resubmit (2 reviewers, 1 Accept, the reviewer who rejected in the first round provided new feedback)
22-Jan-2022 Resubmit
20-Feb-2022 Minor revision
24-Feb-2022 Submit
27-Feb-2022 Accept.

Overall, the process was quite lengthy and luck was not on my side (encountered the odd situation of uploading the wrong comment... speechless, which delayed the process by a month). However, in the end, I gained a lot from the entire process, including revisions and experimental design aspects.

mmmm1999 2022-02-22

Excuse me, did Xiaoxiu add the item "Formulate concisely the novelty of your submission" when submitting? Previously, there was no requirement to summarize the novelty.

fatislord 2022-02-22

At that time, I contacted not the editor-in-chief, but more accurately the responsible editor in charge of me. This editor is responsible for organizing your review comments, giving a decision on the review, whether it is acceptance or revision, and sending you the review decision email. Generally, it is the responsible editor who sends the email, and the email will contain the email address of the responsible editor. At that time, I directly sent the email to this responsible editor, and the replies were relatively prompt. However, unless absolutely necessary, it is better not to directly contact the editor, but rather follow up with the adm for reminders.

sushi1220 2022-02-17

Hello, are you referring to the adm (administrator) of the submission interface when you mentioned "manager"? How can I contact the editor-in-chief? Is it through the contact information of the editor-in-chief on the journal's homepage?

Leezihao 2022-02-09

History has finally been accepted after three months.
2021.11.2 - Under review
2021.12.16 - Revised and resubmitted
2022.1.15 - Resubmitted
2022.2.2 - Minor revision
2022.2.3 - Resubmitted
2022.2.8 - Accepted
Efficient IEEE Sensor journal ?

tsuibeyond 2022-02-06

The IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL has finally been accepted, and the overall timeline is as follows:

August 1, 2021: Submission

November 1, 2021: Sent a reminder to the editor

November 9, 2021: Editor replied, stating that patience is needed to wait for the review comments

November 29, 2021: First review comments: resubmit

December 15, 2021: Resubmitted after making modifications

January 25, 2022: Second review comments: minor revision

January 29, 2022: Submitted after making modifications

February 6, 2022: Accepted! Finally accepted! Celebrations!

The entire process took from August 1, 2021 to February 6, 2022, a total of 6 months of waiting.

During the process, there were constant doubts, which were quite frustrating. Fortunately, the final result met expectations.

During the New Year period, I wish everyone a prosperous Year of the Tiger, and may all your efforts find their rightful place and bring more surprises.

Envy 2022-01-31

After submitting, it took one or two weeks for the editor to reject it, stating that my direction was incorrect. The problem is, if I hadn't seen anyone with my direction publishing in this magazine, could I still submit?

Geniusheng 2022-01-29

2021-10-12 submit
2021-11-21 reject major
2021-12-21 revise and resubmit
2022-01-05 minor
2022-01-13 revise
2022-01-28 accept.

Translation:
2021-10-12 submit
2021-11-21 reject major
2021-12-21 revise and resubmit
2022-01-05 minor
2022-01-13 revise
2022-01-28 accept.

来自深海的小鲤鱼 2022-01-25

Yes, the reviewers don't know. Let's see what the editor says. Personally, I don't think they would recommend someone just for the sake of it.

来自深海的小鲤鱼 2022-01-25

Personality is such, bro, are you replying as "Desert Fox" or "Little Carp"? Hehe, if it's "Little Carp", I'll add you so we can private chat easily.

性格如此 2022-01-25

Yes, that's how it happened. After some major revisions, it was accepted after the modifications.

沙漠飞狐 2022-01-25

Do you need to choose a reviewer when you submit? And after submitting, is the status directly under review? Thank you.

沙漠飞狐 2022-01-25

When submitting, you need to fill in the reviewer's name. I'm not sure if it will be directly assigned to the reviewer you fill in.

沙漠飞狐 2022-01-25

When I submitted, it went directly to under review. I don't know if everyone is experiencing the same thing.

来自深海的小鲤鱼 2022-01-21

Under review for 45 days, then awaiting decision for one week, and then under review for 10 days, followed by awaiting decision for one day, and then under review again. I haven't made any changes yet, what is this situation? It's so mysterious.
My guess is that the three instances of "under review" are: normal review, searching for arbitration, and the arbitrator refusing to review and finding a new arbitrator.
I hope experienced researchers who have submitted papers can give me some guidance on this mystery!

小石头不会沉 2022-01-20

No, you can find several journals in the same field for reference. My understanding is that using a single image can express the core work of your article. This image can be any image that is not necessarily included in the main text.

Zheng Siyu 2022-01-19

Hello, may I ask you some questions regarding submission?

Zheng Siyu 2022-01-19

Hello! May I ask if "图形摘要" means extracting all the charts in the article and combining them into a PDF file?

Leezihao 2022-01-18

Does reapplying mean getting hired in just one day?