Yifeng Chen 2021-09-15

7.20 submit - Submitted on July 20th
7.20 Under review - Under review since July 20th
8.11 revise request - Request for revision on August 11th
9.4 revise request - Request for revision on September 4th
9.14 accept - Accepted on September 14th

miaof 2021-09-14

Two reviewers, Japanese editor Yasushi Sekine, has an exceptionally fast efficiency and was hired in less than three months.

jie- 2021-09-13

Explanation of Time Change: The reviewers refused to review the manuscript, so we need to find new reviewers.

孤独的大坑 2021-09-13

Have you ever encountered a situation where "Under review" does not change but the date keeps changing? What could be the reason for this?

jie- 2021-09-12

5.19 submitted
6.11 under review
6.23 required reviews completed
7.2 Urged for a quick response, they said to return as soon as possible
7.3 Modification
7.22 revised submitted
8.23 required reviews completed
9.11 accepted (urged for it)
Italian editors are too slow, feeling exhausted, but very happy!

朝阳群众 2021-09-10

2021.5.20 Submitted
2021.5.23 With editor (Principal Editor Zuohua Huang, Ph.D.)
2021.5.24-7.13 Under review (Never checked)
2021.7.14 Revise (Editor changed to Pietro Bartocci, Ph.D., published after all 7 reviewers' modifications, with a total of 46 issues)
2021.8.7 Revised submitted (Mainly responses/discussions, nearly 9000 words written)
2021.8.23 Accept
2021.8.26 Proofs e-mail
2021.8.29 Submit
2021.9.3 Share your article (Online)
Overall: The most reviewers ever received for a submission, previously the most was 3, this time an Italian editor sent 7, quite intimidating, luckily the article had substance.

朝阳群众 2021-09-10

Just indicating that the minimum number of review information has been received (if 5 reviewers are assigned, the editor will be notified by the system when 2 reviews are completed). It is possible that there are still some review information yet to be received. The other party has not declined the review, and the editing is not overdue, so we will wait patiently.

epsilon 2021-09-10

Dear experts, may I ask what does it mean that the status "required reviews completed" has been for 10 days already? Is the editor undecided on whether to reject it or not?

北京老陈 2021-09-08

After acceptance, how long will it be published?

SkLamD 2021-09-07

The editor is from Japan and has been with the editor for six days already, but there is still no result. If they want to reject it, please do it straightforwardly.

SkLamD 2021-09-07

2021-8-30 提交 (Submitted)
2021-9-1 编辑中 (With Editor)

哈哈哈哈 2021-09-06

The reviewer may be reviewing the manuscript slowly.

xiaohuli1121 2021-09-05

I was rejected on the second day, the petroleum direction is not quite suitable.

jiexu 2021-09-03

Why does the first trial take so long?

哈哈哈哈 2021-09-03

2021.01.05 Submission
2021.07.23 First-round comments returned (both reviewers requested major revisions)
2021.08.13 Reply to comments
2021.08.28 Second-round comments returned (Reviewer 1 accepted, Reviewer 2 raised a minor issue)
2021.08.29 Reply to comments
2021.09.01 Accept

jiexu 2021-09-02

Is it normal for it to still be under review after two and a half months of submission?

jasnber 2021-08-25

Yasushi Sekine is an editor who processes manuscripts quite quickly.

jie- 2021-08-24

May I ask who is your editor?

jasnber 2021-08-24

7.04 submitted
7.08 under review
8.05 revise
8.15 revised submitted
8.16 under review
8.22 required reviews completed
8.24 accept

山大摩尔 2021-08-23

5.12 submitted
5.14 under review
7.12 revised, with a total of seven reviewers. The comments were very professional.
8.1 submitted revision
8.22 accepted. In the end, only three reviewers' comments for the second review were received.
Overall, the review process was quite fast, but the revision process was a bit challenging. Once again, I would like to thank the reviewers and Italian editor Pietro Bartocci! Lastly, I wish all the brothers in the comment section success with their articles!

摸金校尉 2021-08-22

6.16 submit
6.18 with editor
6.19 under review
6.24 required reviews completed
8.15 revised
8.16 with editor
8.17 under review
8.18 Accept
The speed is quite fast, thank you editor!

KTGEL 2021-08-13

May I ask what kind of journal Fuel Communications is? Does anyone know?

KTGEL 2021-08-13

May I ask, what kind of journal is Fuel Communications, which is a companion journal to Fuel?

陈久 2021-08-06

How to check which editor is handling my article and how to find out who is processing my article? How can I query this information?

专治不服 2021-08-03

May I ask if the fuel review is a system of one vote veto?

V逐梦之光V 2021-08-03

FUEL is still one of the top players in the combustion field, excluding CNF and PCI.
2021.05.03 submitted
2021.05.03 with editor (the time with editor was very short, only a few hours, assigned to the chief editor in the middle of the night, and the chief editor sent it for review at 8 am the next morning, thanks to the high efficiency)
2021.05.04 under review
2021.05.06 under review (a reviewer refused to review, causing a change in dates)
2021.0602 0609 0624 required reviews completed
2021.06.25 revise (4 reviewers, should be 1 accept and 3 revisions)
2021.0713 revise
2021.07.14 under review (3 reviewers)
2021.07.29 required reviews completed
2021.08.02 required reviews completed
2021.08.02 accept
Editor Huang is very efficient, quick in sending for review, and provides a decision on the same day or the next day after receiving all comments.

Xxxx 2021-08-02

7.23 submitted
7.25 with editor
7.25 under review
7.26 under review
8.2 Required Reviews Completed

今晚吃鸡 2021-08-02

6.21 submitted
6.23 with editor
6.24 with editor
6.29 under review
7.5 under review
7.7 under review
8.1 reject, no comments from the reviewers, and the Japanese editor did not provide any substantial feedback, just directly rejected it. Why was it sent for review if there were no comments from the reviewers?

今晚吃鸡 2021-08-02

6.21 Submitted
6.23 With editor
6.24 With editor
6.29 Under review
7.5 Under review
7.7 Under review
8.1 Rejected, without any reviewer comments. The Japanese editor directly rejected it despite being sent for review.

Xxxx 2021-07-28

The first SCI paper
Submitted on 7.23
Edited on 7.25
Under review on 7.25
Under review on 7.26